Difference between revisions of "Team:Duke/Results"

 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
<html>
 
<html>
  
<p><b>Keng</b> Decribe Protein Expression Gels </p>
 
<br><br><br>
 
 
 
<p><b>Joe</b> Decribe Enzyme Assays </p>
 
<br><br><br>
 
 
 
 
<div class="column full_size">
 
<h1>Results</h1>
 
<p>Here you can describe the results of your project and your future plans. </p>
 
</div>
 
  
 
<div class="column full_size">
 
<div class="column full_size">
Line 29: Line 16:
 
<object data="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/ff/T--Duke--ladder.jpeg" width="50%" height="700"></object> <br/>
 
<object data="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/ff/T--Duke--ladder.jpeg" width="50%" height="700"></object> <br/>
 
We then opened the software imageJ, and highlighted the lane of the ladder to be the reference and selected each lane from left to right so that imageJ can automatically determine the level of concentration in a certain location of the gel, and the normalized result is shown below:
 
We then opened the software imageJ, and highlighted the lane of the ladder to be the reference and selected each lane from left to right so that imageJ can automatically determine the level of concentration in a certain location of the gel, and the normalized result is shown below:
 +
<object data="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/08/T--Duke--GelFinal.pdf" width="100%" height="700"> </object>
 
As seen from above, there are 6 panels in the graph, corresponding to (ladder, BAPT, DBAT, badA, tax10, and tycA), and from the left to the right of each panel, the expression levels correspond to from bigger size proteins to smaller size proteins. By using the molecular sizes of proteins and the ladder, we are able to isolate the peaks that correspond to BAPT, DBAT, badA, tax10, and tycA, which are shown in the graph by drawing 2 straight lines from the base of the peak to the bottom of the panel. Therefore, we can calculate the expression levels of proteins in a gel by dividing the area of the peak by the entire area. The protein expression levels for BAPT, DBAT, badA, tax10 are 19.8%, 21.3%, 20.5%,16.7%, respectively. Because we cannot find the protein band that corresponds to the tycA molecular mass, we could not determine protein expression in tycA in this SDS-gel page experiment. The results were repeated in different gels to determine if tycA expression level can be determined, but the result proved to be inconclusive. One possible explanation could be that during the denaturation of the cells, tycA could disintegrate into its different domains due to size, and the protein is thus separated into segments and could not express as the entire enzyme. More work needs to be done to determine protein expression for tycA.
 
As seen from above, there are 6 panels in the graph, corresponding to (ladder, BAPT, DBAT, badA, tax10, and tycA), and from the left to the right of each panel, the expression levels correspond to from bigger size proteins to smaller size proteins. By using the molecular sizes of proteins and the ladder, we are able to isolate the peaks that correspond to BAPT, DBAT, badA, tax10, and tycA, which are shown in the graph by drawing 2 straight lines from the base of the peak to the bottom of the panel. Therefore, we can calculate the expression levels of proteins in a gel by dividing the area of the peak by the entire area. The protein expression levels for BAPT, DBAT, badA, tax10 are 19.8%, 21.3%, 20.5%,16.7%, respectively. Because we cannot find the protein band that corresponds to the tycA molecular mass, we could not determine protein expression in tycA in this SDS-gel page experiment. The results were repeated in different gels to determine if tycA expression level can be determined, but the result proved to be inconclusive. One possible explanation could be that during the denaturation of the cells, tycA could disintegrate into its different domains due to size, and the protein is thus separated into segments and could not express as the entire enzyme. More work needs to be done to determine protein expression for tycA.
 
</p>
 
</p>
  
 
<div class="column third_size" >
 
<div class="column third_size" >
 
<h3>What should this page contain?</h3>
 
<ul>
 
<li> Clearly and objectively describe the results of your work.</li>
 
<li> Future plans for the project. </li>
 
<li> Considerations for replicating the experiments. </li>
 
</ul>
 
</div>
 
 
 
 
 
<div class="column two_thirds_size" >
 
<h3>Describe what your results mean </h3>
 
<ul>
 
<li> Interpretation of the results obtained during your project. Don't just show a plot/figure/graph/other, tell us what you think the data means. This is an important part of your project that the judges will look for. </li>
 
<li> Show data, but remember all measurement and characterization data must be on part pages in the Registry. </li>
 
<li> Consider including an analysis summary section to discuss what your results mean. Judges like to read what you think your data means, beyond all the data you have acquired during your project. </li>
 
</ul>
 
</div>
 
  
  
 
<div class="clear extra_space"></div>
 
<div class="clear extra_space"></div>
  
 
 
<div class="column two_thirds_size" >
 
<h3> Project Achievements </h3>
 
 
<p>You can also include a list of bullet points (and links) of the successes and failures you have had over your summer. It is a quick reference page for the judges to see what you achieved during your summer.</p>
 
 
<ul>
 
<li>A list of linked bullet points of the successful results during your project</li>
 
<li>A list of linked bullet points of the unsuccessful results during your project. This is about being scientifically honest. If you worked on an area for a long time with no success, tell us so we know where you put your effort.</li>
 
</ul>
 
 
</div>
 
 
 
 
<div class="column third_size" >
 
<div class="highlight decoration_A_full">
 
<h3>Inspiration</h3>
 
<p>See how other teams presented their results.</p>
 
<ul>
 
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:TU_Darmstadt/Results/Pathway">2014 TU Darmstadt </a></li>
 
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Imperial/Results">2014 Imperial </a></li>
 
<li><a href="https://2014.igem.org/Team:Paris_Bettencourt/Results">2014 Paris Bettencourt </a></li>
 
</ul>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
  
  

Latest revision as of 02:36, 18 October 2018

Protein Expression Results

To test the expression levels of our proteins, we used the shake flask protein expression technique. The specific details of the protocol can be found in the protocol section of the website. Prior to performing the SDS-page, we made sure that all the OD600 for our cells (BAPT, DBAT, badA, tax10, tycA) are around 10.0 for consistency of protein amount in SDS-page. After the SDS-page has finished running, the gel is stained and destained and a greyscale image of the gel look like the follows: As seen from the graph, from the right to the left, the lanes are the ladder (Mark12TM Unstained Standard), BAPT, DBAT, badA, tax10, and tycA). Although the gel was broken during the destaining process, we were able to put the gel back together. To demonstrate the most accurate level of protein expression, we changed the contrast of the image so that only dark bands on the gel can be seen when using the imaging software, the contrasted image is shown below: And the ladder we used have the following configuration:

We then opened the software imageJ, and highlighted the lane of the ladder to be the reference and selected each lane from left to right so that imageJ can automatically determine the level of concentration in a certain location of the gel, and the normalized result is shown below: As seen from above, there are 6 panels in the graph, corresponding to (ladder, BAPT, DBAT, badA, tax10, and tycA), and from the left to the right of each panel, the expression levels correspond to from bigger size proteins to smaller size proteins. By using the molecular sizes of proteins and the ladder, we are able to isolate the peaks that correspond to BAPT, DBAT, badA, tax10, and tycA, which are shown in the graph by drawing 2 straight lines from the base of the peak to the bottom of the panel. Therefore, we can calculate the expression levels of proteins in a gel by dividing the area of the peak by the entire area. The protein expression levels for BAPT, DBAT, badA, tax10 are 19.8%, 21.3%, 20.5%,16.7%, respectively. Because we cannot find the protein band that corresponds to the tycA molecular mass, we could not determine protein expression in tycA in this SDS-gel page experiment. The results were repeated in different gels to determine if tycA expression level can be determined, but the result proved to be inconclusive. One possible explanation could be that during the denaturation of the cells, tycA could disintegrate into its different domains due to size, and the protein is thus separated into segments and could not express as the entire enzyme. More work needs to be done to determine protein expression for tycA.