|
|
Line 33: |
Line 33: |
| Through involving different stakeholders, experts, and the public we managed to get the best out of our work. | | Through involving different stakeholders, experts, and the public we managed to get the best out of our work. |
| During the process of evolving our project we frequently asked the following questions: | | During the process of evolving our project we frequently asked the following questions: |
| + | <br> |
| <li>Is our project useful? </li> | | <li>Is our project useful? </li> |
| <li> Who can make use of our end product?</li> | | <li> Who can make use of our end product?</li> |
Revision as of 11:14, 6 October 2018
LiU iGEM
Integrated Human Practices
The idea that is presented here on our wiki has evolved a lot since we first started the journey towards the Giant Jamboree 2018.
Through involving different stakeholders, experts, and the public we managed to get the best out of our work.
During the process of evolving our project we frequently asked the following questions:
Is our project useful?
Who can make use of our end product?
Where are the limitations and the potential bottlenecks?
What does the the public know about Synthetic Biology and how should this affect the way we present our work?
What is the most important aspect of Synthetic Biology according to the public?
Since we started asking these questions, our project has changed focus.
Our idea changed from gaining insight into how chaperones in E.coli can be used to study protein folding in neurodegenerative diseases, to focusing on increasing protein production by facilitating the folding process.
This development came from a number of steps taken within the project. By continuing reading, we will do our best in order to guide you through these steps.
Survey - Letting the Public Influence What We Do in The Lab