Difference between revisions of "Team:Uppsala/Transcriptomics/cDNA Conversion"

Line 328: Line 328:
 
<h2>Experiment</h2>
 
<h2>Experiment</h2>
  
<p>Reverse transcription consists of 3 major steps - complementary DNA strand synthesis, RNA digestion and synthesis of second strand. The steps are described below:
+
<p>Reverse transcription consists of 3 major steps - complementary DNA strand synthesis, RNA digestion and synthesis of second strand. The steps are described below:<br><br>
  
 
<b>Synthesis of complementary DNA strand:</b><br>
 
<b>Synthesis of complementary DNA strand:</b><br>
Line 343: Line 343:
  
  
 +
<h2>Result</h2>
  
 +
<p>In order to call a synthesis successful, cDNA needs to be synthesized in sufficient quantity with no RNA contamination, as the RNA would interfere with subsequent sequencing.<br><br>
 +
 +
<b>Qubit measurement of DNA:</b>
 +
Initially, our only criteria for cDNA synthesis was an amount of cDNA as measured by Qubit (Thermo Fisher). Typically, the cDNA amount would be equal to roughly twice the mass of the input RNA. <br><br>
 +
 +
<b>Qubit measurement of RNA:</b>
 +
Due to sequencing runs having rather low throughput and quite significant clogging of the pores, we decided to also measure RNA content of our cDNA samples. In most samples, significant amount of RNA were found, sometimes equal to the initial input of RNA. </p>
 +
 +
<h2>Troubleshooting</h2>
 +
 +
<h3>Does mix of RNA/DNA interfere with Qubit measurement?</h3>
 +
 +
<h4>Hypothesis:</h4>
 +
<p>The measured RNA in the sample could be caused due to lack of specificity of Qubit dye eg. RNA dye actually has affinity to DNA and therefore shows RNA in our samples.</p>
 +
 +
<h4>Experiment:</h4>
 +
<p>Samples containing only RNA or DNA in concentration of 10 ng/µl were prepared in triplicate and each measured with two different Qubit kits (RNA HS Kit, DNA HS Kit, Thermo Fisher). </p>
 +
 +
<h4>Results:</h4>
 +
<p>The table below shows average measured values for each of the samples. Measuring RNA (or DNA) with corresponding Kit resulted in expected results eg. around 10 ng of RNA and very low amount of DNA. Similar results were seen for DNA sample. When DNA was added into RNA, the measured RNA amount decreased, which was the only measuring bias we have observed. </p>
 +
 +
 +
 +
<table class=” pgrouptable tablesorter our-table” style=“width: 100%;” cellspacing="15"; cellpadding=“0”>
 +
<th style= “width: auto”>Sample</th>
 +
<th style=“width: auto” >RNA [ng/µL]</th>
 +
<th style=“width: auto”>DNA [ng/µL]/th>
 +
<th style=“width: auto”>After adding DNA</th>
 +
<th style=“width: auto”>After adding RNA</th>
 +
</tr></thead>
 +
<tbody><tr>
 +
 +
<td>RNA sample 10 ng/µl</td>
 +
<td >
 +
9.84
 +
</td>
 +
<td>
 +
0.64
 +
</td>
 +
<td>6.86</td>
 +
<td>-</td></tr><tr>
 +
 +
 +
 +
<td>DNA sample 10 ng/µl</td>
 +
<td >
 +
0.33
 +
</td>
 +
<td>
 +
11.3
 +
</td>
 +
<td>-</td>
 +
<td>
 +
11.7
 +
</td>
 +
</tr></thead>
 +
</tr></tbody></table>
 +
 +
 +
 +
<!-- End of Code For TABLE -->
 +
 +
  
  

Revision as of 09:11, 15 October 2018