Difference between revisions of "Team:Aix-Marseille/Human Practices"
(→Integrated Human Practices) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
= Integrated Human Practices = | = Integrated Human Practices = | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Since the beginning of our project we thought about the Human Practices. In order to make it serving all we discussed with specialist and we investigated the needs of people. By this way we designed and developed our scientific approach. Through this view we were able to optimize and make a relevant process. | Since the beginning of our project we thought about the Human Practices. In order to make it serving all we discussed with specialist and we investigated the needs of people. By this way we designed and developed our scientific approach. Through this view we were able to optimize and make a relevant process. | ||
Hence, we interested in the different sides of the Human Practices Integrated. This is why we devoted our effort in three points : | Hence, we interested in the different sides of the Human Practices Integrated. This is why we devoted our effort in three points : | ||
| − | + | ||
== Surveys == | == Surveys == | ||
| − | At first, we didn't know the relation between citizens and bed bugs, how they were impacted by this scourge ? Moreover we wanted to expand our knowledges : what was the needs of infested people? To improve our understanding we decided to perform surveys which was the most appropriate method. First we focused to the general public opinion about : the issues caused by bed bugs, the kind of solutions they needed and theirs GMO's thoughts. Thanks to these surveys we determined the current solution is the insecticides which are a source of pollution. Besides general public reported us a lack of efficiency due to the resurgence of bed bugs. Afterwhile the major feedback to the use of our solution was a trap than a spread. We observed a division in the matter of GMOs, 48,1% for and 51,9% against. This is why we choose to design a trap without including GMOs. | + | At first, we didn't know the relation between citizens and bed bugs, how they were impacted by this scourge ? Moreover we wanted to expand our knowledges : what was the needs of infested people? To improve our understanding we decided to perform surveys which was the most appropriate method. First we focused to the general public opinion about : the issues caused by bed bugs, the kind of solutions they needed and theirs GMO's thoughts. Thanks to these surveys we determined the current solution is the insecticides which are a source of pollution. Besides general public reported us a lack of efficiency due to the resurgence of bed bugs. Afterwhile the major feedback to the use of our solution was a trap than a spread. We observed a division in the matter of GMOs, 48,1% for and 51,9% against. This is why we choose to design a trap without including GMOs. More info... |
== Interviews == | == Interviews == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Our trap idea was suggest by general public, however it was essential to have the support of professionals. Then we contacted specialists of bed bugs field in order to validate our project feasibility. We met Mr Gremaud who works on bed bugs detection, he approved the use of pheromones.To certify this idea we consulted a bed bugs expert : Mr Berenger confirmed the pheromones-based trap was the best solution to struggle against bed bugs. This expert helped us to the trap development and explained us how optimize our work. We feel privileged to receive Mr Moncler, an entrepreneurship consultant who gave some advices to monitor our project as a company. Thanks to these experts consultations we had conducted the project in the better way. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
== Testimonies == | == Testimonies == | ||
Revision as of 21:23, 15 October 2018
Integrated human practices
Integrated Human Practices
Since the beginning of our project we thought about the Human Practices. In order to make it serving all we discussed with specialist and we investigated the needs of people. By this way we designed and developed our scientific approach. Through this view we were able to optimize and make a relevant process.
Hence, we interested in the different sides of the Human Practices Integrated. This is why we devoted our effort in three points :
Surveys
At first, we didn't know the relation between citizens and bed bugs, how they were impacted by this scourge ? Moreover we wanted to expand our knowledges : what was the needs of infested people? To improve our understanding we decided to perform surveys which was the most appropriate method. First we focused to the general public opinion about : the issues caused by bed bugs, the kind of solutions they needed and theirs GMO's thoughts. Thanks to these surveys we determined the current solution is the insecticides which are a source of pollution. Besides general public reported us a lack of efficiency due to the resurgence of bed bugs. Afterwhile the major feedback to the use of our solution was a trap than a spread. We observed a division in the matter of GMOs, 48,1% for and 51,9% against. This is why we choose to design a trap without including GMOs. More info...
Interviews
Our trap idea was suggest by general public, however it was essential to have the support of professionals. Then we contacted specialists of bed bugs field in order to validate our project feasibility. We met Mr Gremaud who works on bed bugs detection, he approved the use of pheromones.To certify this idea we consulted a bed bugs expert : Mr Berenger confirmed the pheromones-based trap was the best solution to struggle against bed bugs. This expert helped us to the trap development and explained us how optimize our work. We feel privileged to receive Mr Moncler, an entrepreneurship consultant who gave some advices to monitor our project as a company. Thanks to these experts consultations we had conducted the project in the better way.