Difference between revisions of "Team:Paris Bettencourt/Design"

Line 333: Line 333:
 
<p>StarCore proteins were constructed as translational fusions using GoldenGate assembly.</p>
 
<p>StarCore proteins were constructed as translational fusions using GoldenGate assembly.</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
 +
<div class="text2 img">
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/cf/T--Paris_Bettencourt--constructs_cloning.png">
 +
</div>
 +
<div class="textbody span">
 +
<b>Figure N </b>Legend.
 +
</div>
 +
 
<div class='textbody h1'>
 
<div class='textbody h1'>
 
<h1>Discussion</h1>
 
<h1>Discussion</h1>

Revision as of 16:11, 17 October 2018

Design

In 2016, Lam et al., described SNAPPS (Structurally Nanoengineered Antimicrobial Peptide Polymers). SNAPPs are a unique class of star-shaped antimicrobial peptides with activity against a range of Gram-negative pathogens.

Box 1: What are SNAPPs?
SNAPPS are built from short chains of lysine and valine, 10-30 amino acids long. These peptide arms are conjugated at one end to a core of poly(amido amine). Each core may be linked to 16-32 separate arms. The result is positively charged protein star, about 20 nm across.

The goal of this project is to replace chemically synthesized SNAPPs with fully synthetic biological fusion proteins. We reasoned that the key features of SNAPP geometry could be reproduced by fusing short, positively charged AMPs to the N- and C- termini of highly multimeric proteins. In this way, the naturally multimeric protein subunits form the core of the structure and the fused AMPs extend outward to form the arms of the star-shape. We called the resulting proteins StarCores.

Architectural Principles of Star Cores

Following Shirbin (2018), we identified some key features needed for effective StarCores.

1) Arm number between 4-32. If each monomer of protein is fused to an AMP at both ends, then we want to use proteins that form 2- to 16-mer homomultimeric complexes.

2) Star size smaller than 30 nm. SNAPPs are most effective when they are dense, presenting many AMPs to the membrane.

3) Strong Positive Charge. Bacterial membranes are negatively charged and the SNAPP interaction and pore formation is charge-mediated.

Combinatorial Design of StarCores

Protein engineering is challenging. A good synthetic protein needs to express efficiently, fold tightly, avoid self-aggregation and then function with high activity. We knew it was unlikely that we would design a perfect StarCore on the first try. Therefore, we decided to design many StarCores and screen them systematically.

First, we selected 15 known AMPs to function as the arms of the StarCore. The purpose of these AMPs is to functionally substitute for the lysine-valine chains in the original SNAPP design. Therefore, we chose AMPs with a high density of positive charges, reasoning that they would interact with bacterial membranes by a similar mechanism. Our second criterion for AMP selection was simply diversity. We chose natural AMPs from many organisms as well as synthetic AMPs.

Peptide Name Class Source Activity
Cg-Def Defensin Crassostrea gigas (Oyster) Antibacterial, Antifungal
Alyteserin-2a Alyteserin Alytes obstetricans (Toad) Antibacterial, Cytotoxicity
Pardaxin P-1 Pardaxin Pardachirus pavoninus (Fish) Cytotoxic
ɑ-1-purothionin Thionin Triticum aestivum (Wheat) Cytotoxic
Arenicin-1 Arenicin Arenicola marina (Lugworm) Antibacterial, Antifungal, Cytotoxic
Ovispirin-1 Sheep-derived Synthetic Antibacterial, Cytotoxic
V6 peptide Cyclic cationic Synthetic Antibacterial
PolyVK-11 Poly-VK Synthetic Antibacterial
PolyVK-12 Poly-VK Synthetic Antibacterial
PolyVK-21 Poly-VK Synthetic Antibacterial
Bactofencin A IId Lactobacillus Antibacterial
Aureocin A5 IId Staphylococcus Antibacterial
Bacteriocin E50-52 IIa Enterococcus Antibacterial
Enterocin A IIa Enterococcus Antibacterial
Pediocin PA-1 IIa Pediococcus Antibacterial

Next, we selected 14 proteins to use as the core of the StarCore. There are many potential multimeric proteins found in nature. We filtered them by a variety of criteria, favoring convenience and diversity (Box 2).

For each core protein, we used the PDB structure to determine if the N- or C-termini, or both, were free to accept protein fusions. We only constructed fusion proteins using ends that were determined to be free.

Box 2: Criteria for Selecting Core Proteins

- The monomer must be expressible in E. coli:

  • Previous literature showing expression,

  • No post-translational modifications,

  • Bacterial origin preferred.

  • - The monomer must self-assemble into a homomultimeric complex.

    - The compex must have a size between 4-25 nm.

    - The complex must have known structure deposited in the PDB.

    - The N- and/or C- termini of the monomers should be free.

    - The set of complexes should be of diverse shapes.

    Following these criteria, we selected the following proteins from RCSB Protein data bank.

    NAME Ferritin MS2 Qbeta Small HSP
    PDB reference 4XGS 7msf 5vlz 1SHS
    Antimicrobial peptide fused to N-terminal N-terminal
    C-terminal
    C-terminal C-terminal
    Image 4XGS 7MSF 5vlz 1SHS


    NAME ConcavalinA Pyruvate dehydrogenase Designed protein lyase cage Isoaspartyl Dipeptidase
    PDB reference 2g4i 1EAA 4QCC 5LP3
    Antimicrobial peptide fused to N-terminal
    C-terminal
    N-terminal N-terminal N-terminal
    Image 2g4i 1EAA 4QCC 5LP3


    NAME GTP_Cyclo-hydrolase FucU isomerase Pizza_3 Holo- synthase
    PDB reference 1GTP 2WCV 3WW8 5xu7
    Antimicrobial peptide fused to N-terminal C-terminal N-terminal
    C-terminal
    N-terminal
    C-terminal
    Image 1GTP 2WCV 3WW8 5xu7


    NAME Pizza_2 RADA self-assembling peptide
    PDB reference 3WW7
    Antimicrobial peptide fused to N-terminal
    C-terminal
    N-terminal
    C-terminal
    Image 3WW7

    In total, we designed 210 StarCore proteins as the combinatorial fusion of 15 AMPs to 14 cores.

    Results

    Construction of the StarCore Fusion Proteins

    StarCore proteins were constructed as translational fusions using GoldenGate assembly.

    Figure N Legend.

    Discussion

    Here will be your text.

    Methods

    T7 Expression Vector

    StarCores were cloned into the pACYCDuet-1 Vector (Novagen). The cloning strategy made use of the manufacturer-suggested start codon, downstream of a T7 promoter. The final construct omitted protein purification tags included in the original vector.

    For cloning, the plasmid was first linearized by digestion with AvrII and NcoI. Then we performed PCR on the linearized vector with Golden Gate cloning sites added as primer tags.

    DNA Synthesis

    Coding sequences for AMPs and core proteins were generously synthesized by team sponsor IDT (Coralville, USA). Codon usage was optimized by the supplier for expression in E. coli. Sequences were free of BioBrick restriction enzyme cut sites, as well as common type IIS restriction sites.

    Golden Gate cloning sites were added to the ends of each coding sequence by PCR with tagged primers.

    Golden Gate Cloning

    We created translational fusions of the AMP peptides to the core proteins using standard Golden Gate cloning. Golden Gate Assembly Mix was supplied by NEB (#E1600S). Cloning reactions made use of the the BsaI enzyme and 4 custom cloning overhangs.


  • GG1: 5′-GGTCTCNCATG-3′

  • GG2: 5′-GGTCTCNATCA-3′

  • GG3: 5′-GGTCTCNTTCG-3′

  • GG4: 5′-GGTCTCNTGAC-3′

  • The AMP, core and plasmid backbones were assembled in one step.

    In cases where the N-terminus of the core protein could not be tagged, the core sequence was amplified with GG1 and the N-terminal AMP was omitted. The C-terminus was treated similarly. No additional amino acids were added to the coding sequences of core termini deemed unsuitable for tagging.

    Transformation and Construct Validation

    Golden Gate asseumbly products were transformed into E. coli DH5a. Because this strain lacks T7 polymerase, it does not express the potentially antimicrobial StarCore peptides.

    Successful clones were verified by colony PCR.

    Centre for Research and Interdisciplinarity (CRI)
    Faculty of Medicine Cochin Port-Royal, South wing, 2nd floor
    Paris Descartes University
    24, rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques
    75014 Paris, France
    paris-bettencourt-2018@cri-paris.org