Difference between revisions of "Team:Uppsala/Phage Display"

Line 344: Line 344:
  
 
<div>
 
<div>
</p>
+
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
  
Line 396: Line 396:
 
<p>To be able to wash away unbound phages, while retaining the bound phages, existing protocols employ various methods for immobilizing the target. Since the target of our experiment is the surface of an entire organism rather than a single protein, the common methods of fixing the target were ineffective, and a new method had to be developed.  
 
<p>To be able to wash away unbound phages, while retaining the bound phages, existing protocols employ various methods for immobilizing the target. Since the target of our experiment is the surface of an entire organism rather than a single protein, the common methods of fixing the target were ineffective, and a new method had to be developed.  
 
The implemented solution relies on filter inserts for eppendorf tubes. The filters simultaneously act as a substitute for well plates and an immobilization method.  
 
The implemented solution relies on filter inserts for eppendorf tubes. The filters simultaneously act as a substitute for well plates and an immobilization method.  
</p> <br></br>
+
</p>  
  
 
<h3>Experiment procedure</h3>
 
<h3>Experiment procedure</h3>
Line 560: Line 560:
 
                         </div>
 
                         </div>
  
                         <div class="side-img"">
+
                         <div class="side-img">
 
                           <!-- Here goes the big image to the right -->  
 
                           <!-- Here goes the big image to the right -->  
 
                           <img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/39/T--Uppsala--phageelisa_small.jpg>
 
                           <img src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/39/T--Uppsala--phageelisa_small.jpg>
Line 573: Line 573:
  
 
<p><b>Table 2:</b> Samples sent to sequencing. *TUP = Target-Unrelated Peptide.</p>
 
<p><b>Table 2:</b> Samples sent to sequencing. *TUP = Target-Unrelated Peptide.</p>
<table class="pgrouptable tablesorter our-table” style=“width: 100%;cellspacing=“0" cellpadding=“0”>
+
<table class="pgrouptable tablesorter our-table" style="width: 100%;" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
 
     <thead>
 
     <thead>
 
         <tr>
 
         <tr>
Line 600: Line 600:
 
             </td>
 
             </td>
 
         </tr>
 
         </tr>
          
+
         <tr>
 
             <td>Series 3
 
             <td>Series 3
 
             </td>
 
             </td>
Line 720: Line 720:
 
Due to the fact that our ELISA-test was inconclusive we can not be sure that our peptides are specific binders. However, only one was predicted as a Polysterene binder and none contain any known TUP-sequences. A blastp on Biopanning Databank showed that EF01122224 showed some similarities with an antibody for a pork tapeworm epithelial proteins and EF01122218 for an antibody for rabbit epithelia. The E-values were high, 185  and 10 respectively, but those two would be promising candidates for future studies.  
 
Due to the fact that our ELISA-test was inconclusive we can not be sure that our peptides are specific binders. However, only one was predicted as a Polysterene binder and none contain any known TUP-sequences. A blastp on Biopanning Databank showed that EF01122224 showed some similarities with an antibody for a pork tapeworm epithelial proteins and EF01122218 for an antibody for rabbit epithelia. The E-values were high, 185  and 10 respectively, but those two would be promising candidates for future studies.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
</div>
 
 
</div>
 
</div>
  

Revision as of 22:32, 16 October 2018