15kuffnerc (Talk | contribs) |
15kuffnerc (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
<div class="meatMeat"> | <div class="meatMeat"> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
− | Our project employs a fluorescent biosensor from Los Alamos, PcaU, that is the product of directed evolution for high sensitivity to a downstream byproduct of TPA metabolism: Protocatechuic acid (PCA). We have shown that this sensor differentiates single micromolar PCA concentrations and can be used to detect TPA. Teams will be able to quantify PET degradation through bacterial fluorescence without need for expensive instruments. | + | Our project employs a fluorescent biosensor from Los Alamos, PcaU, that is the product of directed evolution for high sensitivity to a downstream byproduct of TPA metabolism: Protocatechuic acid (PCA). We have shown that this sensor differentiates single micromolar PCA concentrations and can be used to detect TPA. Teams will be able to quantify PET degradation through bacterial fluorescence without need for expensive instruments. Also, the fluorescent cell-based sensor has potential use in the directed evolution of PETase via flow cytometry. This powerful method can sort up to 10^9 mutants a day! Notably, many of the latest articles of PETase mention that the enzyme holds promise for substantial improvement, making the promise of such an approach quite exciting. Details on the PcaU biosensor are available in its <a href="http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2825002"><u>registry page</u></a>. |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
<div class="center"> | <div class="center"> |
Revision as of 11:54, 17 October 2018
Measurement
Accessible, Sensitive Biosensor for PET Degredation
PET degradation has been and is a popular iGEM project. However, measurement of this degradation remains a challenge.
Current Problems
Figure from Yoshida et. al.
Despite being much more effective at degradation of PET, PETase produces minimal results in a PNPB absorbance assay.
Despite being much more effective at degradation of PET, PETase produces minimal results in a PNPB absorbance assay.
First, the fastest PET degrading enzyme currently on the registry, PETase, is highly specific for PET. This means that despite its superior degrading ability, it will actually produce weaker results when tested with a PNPB esterase assay than less powerful enzymes like LC cutinase (joo et. al.). This assay has been very popular with iGEM teams, but can not be used to determine which of two enzymes is more effective at PET degradation.
Second, enzymatic degradation of PET is glacially slow. No iGEM team has been able to confirm PET degradation on the basis of visual inspection or weight. The only way this degradation has been successfully detected is with powerful instruments such as SEM, mass spec, HPLC, and cell-free expression. Teams without access to these expensive resources have no way to obtain results yet.
Very pricey white benchtop machines that detect PET degradation (SEM, LCMS, HPLC). Very, very pricey.
A popular figure on PETase byproducts and the role of MHETase
Our Solution
Our project employs a fluorescent biosensor from Los Alamos, PcaU, that is the product of directed evolution for high sensitivity to a downstream byproduct of TPA metabolism: Protocatechuic acid (PCA). We have shown that this sensor differentiates single micromolar PCA concentrations and can be used to detect TPA. Teams will be able to quantify PET degradation through bacterial fluorescence without need for expensive instruments. Also, the fluorescent cell-based sensor has potential use in the directed evolution of PETase via flow cytometry. This powerful method can sort up to 10^9 mutants a day! Notably, many of the latest articles of PETase mention that the enzyme holds promise for substantial improvement, making the promise of such an approach quite exciting. Details on the PcaU biosensor are available in its registry page.
The lower boundary of PCAU detection range, n=8. Such sensitivity is necessary if we hope to detect and quantify TPA production from PET degradation.
Contact Us
umarylandigem@gmail.com
Biology - Psychology Building
4094 Campus Dr, College Park, MD 20742
umarylandigem@gmail.com
Biology - Psychology Building
4094 Campus Dr, College Park, MD 20742
© University of Maryland 2018