|
|
| Line 93: |
Line 93: |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| − | ==Chitinase==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === Chitinase production:===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Thanks to our construction, chitinase can be produced by E.coli strain. Chitinase production is revealed efficiency to achieve a sufficient quantity to use it to degrade chitin.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--ChitinaseResults1.jpg|600px|center|]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 1: Figure 1: SDS-PAGE of chitinase produced by E. coli K-12 DH5-alpha.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | As seen in Figure 1, a protein at the expected lenght (30 kDa) was overproduced only at 30°C after IPTG induction in DH5alpha. The non-induction by IPTG show an low band of the protein overproduced. This overproduction should be the chitinase, but it isn't normal that clone N°11 wasn't able to produced at least a significant chitinase quantity at 16°C and 37°C. We clarified that thanks to a western blot, to be sure of chitinase expression by clone N°11.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--ChitinaseResults12.jpg|600px|center|]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 2 : Western blot with anti-HIS antibodies revelation
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Chitinase output are better after IPTG induction at 30°C. This condition of culture will be used to produce in large quantity chitinase for purification and activity tests.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''''(put file of western and blue of BL21 or not?)'''''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === Chitinase purification:===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Chitinase designed had a polyhistidine-tag which allows it to be specifically separated among total proteins. A Akta purification was realized for purify Chit1. Akta Pure is a automated chromatography system for quick and easy purification. A nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid column was necessary to allow specifical interaction between histidines residues and metal ions from the nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid matrix.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | In figure 3, a elution peak corresponding to the chitinase tagged is perceptible, but a light curve at first of elution peak is commensurate with contaminants peak. There isn't a separation of these two peaks therefore contaminants proteins and protein of interest are eluated jointly in the first elution samples. According to this graph and SDS-PAGE, chitinase is present in fraction 6 to 9, but this sample weren't completely pures, a lot of nonspecific proteins were recovered. An other purification is required for better purity, in this case we didn't have time to throw again a ppurification, and that wasn't indispensible for test activity tests. But we prove here that chitinase should be purified thank to its polyhistidine tag.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--ChitinaseResults11.jpg|600px|center|]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 3: Elution graph from chitinase purification
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--ChitinaseResults2.jpg|600px|center|]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 4: SDS-PAGE of polyhistidine-tagged chitinase purification produced by E. coli K-12 DH5-alpha, using a nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid matrix.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''''(put markers lenghts on the image!!!! and indicate chitinase band )'''''
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Showed in figure 4, a protein at 30 kDa corresponding at the chitinase is obtained on bacteria lysate, on the non-purified fraction and on fraction N°6 to fraction N°10. This fractions can be pooled and used for activity tests.
| |
| − | Numerous controls has been done,chitinase was produced without its peptide signal of secretion, so it will be contained in the cytoplasm, the absence of the band at 30 kDa in the pellet verify that chitinase wasn't contained in the membrane.
| |
| − | Bacteria lysate confirmed the presence of chitinase at 30kDa; non-purified migration shows a low quantity of chitinase with all proteins contaminants; break-though sample didn't contain the protein target demonstrating that all chitinase was fixed on nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid matrix.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The results of chitinase purification prove that chitinase can be purified thanks to its polyhistidine-tag. But purification wasn't optimal and can be ameliorated because a lot of contaminants are isolated with chitinase. The nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid matrix column used was well-worn, that can reduced its efficiency. For an optimal separation of chitinase, we should pool eluate fractions containing chitinase and purify until reduce significantly protein contaminants. But without time we continued with this purification to do activity tests.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === Chitinase activity test:===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Schales' procedure was used to test the chitinase activity. Schales' procedure is a colorimetric method commoly used for measuring the reducing sugars.
| |
| − | Chitin is composed of sugar units of either N-acetyl-G-glucosamine. Chitinase degrade chitin producing N-acetyl-G-glucosamine. To monitor chitinase activity, the reducing sugars released after chitin hydrolyse are detected by a color diminution of the yellow Shales' reagent. This color diminution is translated by a absorbance diminution.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | To analyse activity test results, an etalon curve have been done using the final product of chitinase reaction (N-acetyl-G-glucosamine), to know in which concentration of final product must be obtained after reaction to be detected by the method of Schales.
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--ChitinaseResults3.jpg|600px|center|]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 5: Etalon curve of N-acetyl-G-glucosamine after Schales's activity test.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | A final curve has been obtain showing a absorbance diminution in function of increasing N-acetyl-G-glucosamine concentration. With this etalon curve, concentration of final product obtain after chitinase reaction can be determined. This results revealed the efficiency of Schales'procedure to detected N-acetyl-G-glucosamine to 0 at 200 uM.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--ChitinaseResults9.jpg|600px|center|]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 6: Table of absorbance measurements of chitinase activity test
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--ChitinaseResults4.jpg|600px|center|]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 7: Chitinase activity test by Schales' procedure
| |
| − |
| |
| − | According to figure 7, after 30 minutes of reaction a significant activity was mesured. But after 1 hour of reaction the standart deviation put in doubt the significant result at 30 minutes. One of the difficulties encountered was the chitin sample. Chitin sample wasn't completely dissolved in water, it was precipited and a lot of big fragments af shells of shrimps was contained making difficult the pippetage and with difficulty reproducibility. That's why an centrifugation step was added to avoid precipitated chitin to asborbe and affects the results. After centrifugation chitin wasn't really pelleted, it was easily removed. Chitin pellet should be removed in the duplicated sample of 1 hour after reaction, that can be the cause of the high standart deviation in the results. Due to limited time, we weren't able to do another activity test to improve the results and be the most careful at removing and may be we should centrigutated a longer time (not 1 minute but 5 minutes maybe).
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Thanks to etalon curve if we consider only the significant results at 30 minutes, we can conclude that after 30 minutes of enzymatic reaction, our chitinase can released 125 uM of N-acetyl-G-glucosamine.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--ChitinaseResults10.jpg|600px|center|]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 8: Table of measurements of controls for chitinase activity test
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--ChitinaseResults5.jpg|600px|center|]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Figure 9: Controls for chitinase activity test
| |
| − |
| |
| − | '''''( comment the results of table and the graph!!!!!) '''''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==''hmaS''==
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === Mandelate synthase production===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | During these 3 months in the laboratory we managed to introduce a plasmid construct containing the IPTG promoter, the RBS and the hmaS gene, inserted in a PSB1C3 vector. In order to test the production of the encoded protein, we did a SDS PAGE from several cellular supernatant [https://2018.igem.org/Team:Aix-Marseille/Protocols].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--hmaS production - DH5 alpha E.coli strain.png]]
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | Figure 1 SDS-PAGE of HmaS production with induction (2, 3 and) 4, without induction ( 1,NI) and with empty plasmid (5), into a DH5 alpha ''E.coli'' strain.
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--hmaS production - BL21 E.coli strain.png]]
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | Figure 2 SDS-PAGE of HmaS production with induction (2, 3 and) 4, without induction ( 1,NI) and with empty plasmid (5), into a BL21 ''E.coli'' strain.
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | For this test we used 2 different strains of ''E. coli'' Dh5 alpha which is similar to the strain DH1 [https://biocyc.org/organism-summary?object=ECOL536056], and a BL21 strain [https://biocyc.org/organism-summary?object=GCF_000022665].
| |
| − | First, negative control that we made are correct, there is no prodution of HmaS with empty plasmid. Then we can see bands to approximatively 37kDa, that correspond to HmaS molecular wheigt in both case [https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/G4V4S7]. Moreover there does not seem to be any significant difference in protein production between the 4 samples when the temperature varies in the DH5 alpha case, whereas this parameter seems to influence production in BL21, since production seems less pronounced at 16 °C. Overall, the production of HmaS appears to be lower when the host is a BL21 strain compared to a production in a strain DH5 alpha. However what we can say now is that we found what seems to be an HmaS overproduction.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === Mandelate synthase purification===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | After doing the HmaS production tests and in order to obtain pure fractions of the protein, we subsequently purified the cell lysate of a strain of DH5 alpha transformed with our construct[http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2718011].
| |
| − | For this we did a purification on AKTA with an ion exchange column[https://2018.igem.org/Team:Aix-Marseille/Protocols].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--hmaS purification - AKTA.png]]
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | Figure 3 Elution of HmaS after purification by ion exchange column performed by Akta
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | After the first elution we can see 3 elution peaks in the graph which appear between 85 and 125 ml of solution B passage. One of them seems to be our protein however results are not perfect, because ion exchange chromatography is not the best technique to isolate protein. That is why we decided to do SDS-PAGE on the elution fractions to see if the protein is present (see figures 4a and 4b)[https://2018.igem.org/Team:Aix-Marseille/Protocols]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--Post purification SDS PAGE 1.png]]
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | Figure 4a SDS-PAGE of eluate after purifiction L. Ladder , 1'Bacterial lysate ; 2'pellet of bacteria lysate ; 3' non purified fraction ; 4' breakthrought during protein injection ; 5' breakthrought during wash before elution ; 3,8,9 and 10 elution samples
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--Post purification SDS PAGE 2.png]]
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | Figure 4b SDS-PAGE of eluate after purifiction L. Ladder 11 to 24 elution sample
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | A big spot, approxomatively to 37kDa, can be seen that's may correspond to HmaS. Nevertheless samples are not pure, others proteins are with HmaS. HmaS is on fractions 8 to 17, that's correspon to second spike on figure 3. So w have partly purifed HmaS. However, We can improve this purification, by using other methods like size eclusion chromatography.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === Mandelate synthase activity test ===
| |
| − | After inserting the p_lac-RBS-hmaS construct into the psb1c3 plasmid [http://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K2718011] and getting our 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate synthase production and purification results, we were wondered if our protein was functional. In order to test the 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate synthase activity in our E.coli strain, we have made an HPLC test on supernatent cells as described in our protocols tab : [https://2018.igem.org/Team:Aix-Marseille/Protocols]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--HPLC Test DH5 alpha.png]]
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--HPLC Test DH5 alpha + empty plasmid PSB1C3.png]]
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--HPLC Test DH5 alpha + promotor-rbs-hmaS plasmid construction (PSB1A2).png]]
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--HPLC Test DH5 alpha + promotor-rbs-hmaS plasmid construction (PSB1C3).png]]
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--Hplc s mandelate rate evolution.png]]
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--Hplc phenylpyruvic acid rate evolution.png]]
| |
| − | <br>
| |
| − | [[File:T--Aix-Marseille--Hplc phenylalanine rate evolution.png]]
| |
| | | | |
| | ==Results of trap tests== | | ==Results of trap tests== |
