Difference between revisions of "Team:Uppsala/Human Practices/Market Analysis"

Line 397: Line 397:
 
                             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/00/T--Uppsala--SwNrTreatNrDiagwiki.png" id="img-figure1;" style="  padding-bottom: 20px;  width: 85%; margin-top: -34px;  padding-left: 40px;">
 
                             <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/00/T--Uppsala--SwNrTreatNrDiagwiki.png" id="img-figure1;" style="  padding-bottom: 20px;  width: 85%; margin-top: -34px;  padding-left: 40px;">
 
                           <br>
 
                           <br>
                             <p> <strong> Figure 1. </strong> Relations between the “Frequency of diagnoses per year” VS “Frequency of anthelmintic treatment per year”. &#60;1 corresponds to treatments occurring less often than once per year. NA represents the group that did not answer about frequency of diagnosis. </p>
+
                             <p> <strong> Figure 1. </strong> Relations between the “Frequency of diagnoses per year” vs “Frequency of anthelmintic treatment per year”. &#60;1 corresponds to treatments occurring less often than once per year. NA represents the group that did not answer about frequency of diagnosis. </p>
 
                         </div>
 
                         </div>
  
Line 429: Line 429:
 
                             <!--change src to that of the image you want-->
 
                             <!--change src to that of the image you want-->
 
                             <img class="content-card-img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/6f/T--Uppsala--SwNrTreatOpenGMOwiki1.png" width="75%" style="width: 75%;">
 
                             <img class="content-card-img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/6f/T--Uppsala--SwNrTreatOpenGMOwiki1.png" width="75%" style="width: 75%;">
                         <p><strong> Figure 2. </strong> Relation between the “Frequency of anthelmintic treatment per year” VS “Attitude towards using a GMO based diagnosis tool”. &#60;1 corresponds to treatments occurring less often than once per year.
+
                         <p><strong> Figure 2. </strong> Relation between the “Frequency of anthelmintic treatment per year” vs “Attitude towards using a GMO based diagnosis tool”. &#60;1 corresponds to treatments occurring less often than once per year.
 
                       </p>
 
                       </p>
  
Line 498: Line 498:
 
                             <img class="content-card-img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a8/T--Uppsala--SWNrDiagHeardSickwiki.png">   
 
                             <img class="content-card-img" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a8/T--Uppsala--SWNrDiagHeardSickwiki.png">   
 
                            
 
                            
                             <p> <strong> Figure 4. </strong> "Frequency of diagnoses per year" VS "Experienced cases of strongyle infections". NA represents the group that did not answer about frequency of diagnosis. </p>
+
                             <p> <strong> Figure 4. </strong> "Frequency of diagnoses per year" vs "Experienced cases of strongyle infections". NA represents the group that did not answer about frequency of diagnosis. </p>
 
                         </div>
 
                         </div>
  
Line 562: Line 562:
  
  
                         <div class="inner-figure-text">  <p> <strong> Figure 5. </strong> Relation between the “ "Frequency of diagnoses per year"” VS “Knowledge about resistance”. The figure to the left comes from the Swedish survey and the figure to the right comes from the Czech survey.  NA represents the group that did not answer about frequency of diagnosis. </p>
+
                         <div class="inner-figure-text">  <p> <strong> Figure 5. </strong> Relation between the “ "Frequency of diagnoses per year"” vs “Knowledge about resistance”. The figure to the left comes from the Swedish survey and the figure to the right comes from the Czech survey.  NA represents the group that did not answer about frequency of diagnosis. </p>
 
                         </div>
 
                         </div>
  
Line 618: Line 618:
 
                     <div class="one-figure-text">
 
                     <div class="one-figure-text">
 
                         <div class="inner-figure-text">
 
                         <div class="inner-figure-text">
             <p> <strong> Figure 6. </strong> Correlation between the “Frequency of anthelmintic treatment per year” VS “Knowledge about resistance”. The figure to the left comes from the Swedish survey and the figure to the right comes from the Czech survey.  &#60;1 corresponds to treatments occurring less often than once per year. </p>
+
             <p> <strong> Figure 6. </strong> Correlation between the “Frequency of anthelmintic treatment per year” vs “Knowledge about resistance”. The figure to the left comes from the Swedish survey and the figure to the right comes from the Czech survey.  &#60;1 corresponds to treatments occurring less often than once per year. </p>
 
                         </div>
 
                         </div>
 
                     </div>
 
                     </div>
Line 666: Line 666:
  
 
                     <div class="one-figure-text">
 
                     <div class="one-figure-text">
                         <div class="inner-figure-text">      <p> <strong> Figure 7. </strong> "Worry about resistance" VS "Frequency of diagnoses per year" VS “Knowledge about resistance”. The figure to the left comes from the Swedish survey and the figure to the right comes from the Czech survey. </p>
+
                         <div class="inner-figure-text">      <p> <strong> Figure 7. </strong> "Worry about resistance" vs "Frequency of diagnoses per year". The figure to the left comes from the Swedish survey and the figure to the right comes from the Czech survey. </p>
 
                         </div>
 
                         </div>
 
                     </div>
 
                     </div>
Line 712: Line 712:
 
                     </div>
 
                     </div>
 
                     <div class="one-figure-text">
 
                     <div class="one-figure-text">
                         <div class="inner-figure-text"> <p> <strong> Figure 8. </strong> "Worry about resistance" VS "Frequency of anthelmintinc treatments per year" VS “Knowledge about resistance”. The figure to the left comes from the Swedish survey and the figure to the right comes from the Czech survey. The figure to the left comes from the Swedish survey and the figure to the right comes from the Czech survey. </p>
+
                         <div class="inner-figure-text"> <p> <strong> Figure 8. </strong> "Worry about resistance" vs "Frequency of anthelmintinc treatments per year". The figure to the left comes from the Swedish survey and the figure to the right comes from the Czech survey. </p>
 
                         </div>
 
                         </div>
 
                     </div>
 
                     </div>
Line 720: Line 720:
 
  <h2> Conclusions </h2>
 
  <h2> Conclusions </h2>
  
             <br>
+
              
 
+
 
  <p> From the Swedish survey we learned that not everyone diagnoses their horses before treating them with anthelmintics. This could lead to an increment of the resistance towards anthelmintics, which is why we want to make it as easy as possible to diagnose horses in a quantitative manner. This would allow treatments to be customized based on the amount of strongyle burden. To assist this statement we simulated extension of strongyle infections upon anthelmintic treatments of different frequency. Comparing our model to the current average treatment frequency we could suggest treatment optimizations in order to decrease risk of resistance development. Read more about the model <a href="  https://2018.igem.org/Team:Uppsala/Model"> here </a>. </p>
 
  <p> From the Swedish survey we learned that not everyone diagnoses their horses before treating them with anthelmintics. This could lead to an increment of the resistance towards anthelmintics, which is why we want to make it as easy as possible to diagnose horses in a quantitative manner. This would allow treatments to be customized based on the amount of strongyle burden. To assist this statement we simulated extension of strongyle infections upon anthelmintic treatments of different frequency. Comparing our model to the current average treatment frequency we could suggest treatment optimizations in order to decrease risk of resistance development. Read more about the model <a href="  https://2018.igem.org/Team:Uppsala/Model"> here </a>. </p>
  

Revision as of 22:52, 17 October 2018