Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
PHOTOGRAPH BY RANDY OLSON | PHOTOGRAPH BY RANDY OLSON | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
<p>Because of its unique structure, plastic does not degrade. Instead, the plastic just breaks up into smaller and smaller pieces, eventually becoming microplastics. Smaller pieces of plastic and microplastics are more dangerous because they are easier for sealife to ingest. Because of the currents in the oceans, the plastic dumped in the ocean can travel around the world, leaving no parts unaffected. As much as 15% of sand on certain beaches in Hawaii is made of microplastics. [1]</p> | <p>Because of its unique structure, plastic does not degrade. Instead, the plastic just breaks up into smaller and smaller pieces, eventually becoming microplastics. Smaller pieces of plastic and microplastics are more dangerous because they are easier for sealife to ingest. Because of the currents in the oceans, the plastic dumped in the ocean can travel around the world, leaving no parts unaffected. As much as 15% of sand on certain beaches in Hawaii is made of microplastics. [1]</p> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | |||
<h5> Previous Work </h5> | <h5> Previous Work </h5> | ||
<p>In March of 2016, an article was released about the discovery of a bacterium that could degrade PET, polyethylene terephthalate. Ideonella sakaiensis 201-F6 was found to contain a PET hydrolase and a MHET hydrolase, named PETase and MHETase respectively. PETase introduced on a PET film degraded PET into MHET, a monomer of the PET chain, along with minimal amounts of terephthalic acid. In combination with MHETase, the PET film was degraded into the final products of terephthalic acid and ethylene glycol. After 6 weeks, the PET film was almost completely degraded. [2] <br><br> | <p>In March of 2016, an article was released about the discovery of a bacterium that could degrade PET, polyethylene terephthalate. Ideonella sakaiensis 201-F6 was found to contain a PET hydrolase and a MHET hydrolase, named PETase and MHETase respectively. PETase introduced on a PET film degraded PET into MHET, a monomer of the PET chain, along with minimal amounts of terephthalic acid. In combination with MHETase, the PET film was degraded into the final products of terephthalic acid and ethylene glycol. After 6 weeks, the PET film was almost completely degraded. [2] <br><br> | ||
Line 178: | Line 181: | ||
Two years later, in April of 2018, an article was released with extensive research on wild-type PETase and select PETase mutations. The W159H/S238F double mutant of PETase showed significant improvement in crystallinity reduction and product release over the wild-type in just 96 hours. The percent crystallinity change is a result of the pitting on the film caused by the PET degradation. [3] </p> | Two years later, in April of 2018, an article was released with extensive research on wild-type PETase and select PETase mutations. The W159H/S238F double mutant of PETase showed significant improvement in crystallinity reduction and product release over the wild-type in just 96 hours. The percent crystallinity change is a result of the pitting on the film caused by the PET degradation. [3] </p> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
− | <img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/2/21/T--RHIT--DescGraph.jpg" style="width: | + | <img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/2/21/T--RHIT--DescGraph.jpg" style="width:60%"> |
</center> | </center> | ||
<center> Figure 1. A comparison of the previous PETase sequence and the double-mutated sequence. Image included from the April 2018 article. [3] | <center> Figure 1. A comparison of the previous PETase sequence and the double-mutated sequence. Image included from the April 2018 article. [3] | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
<h5> Our Project and Inspiration </h5> | <h5> Our Project and Inspiration </h5> | ||
Line 191: | Line 195: | ||
<img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/cb/T--RHIT--descBefore.jpg" style="width:60%"> | <img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/cb/T--RHIT--descBefore.jpg" style="width:60%"> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
− | <center>Figure | + | <center>Figure 2. Graphical summary of the percentage of recyclables data over the baseline period. [4] </center> |
+ | <br><br> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
<img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/cd/T--RHIT--descAfter.jpg" style="width:60%"> | <img src = "https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/cd/T--RHIT--descAfter.jpg" style="width:60%"> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
− | <center>Figure | + | <center>Figure 3. Graphical summary of the percentage of recyclables collected over the improvement period. [4] </center> |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Revision as of 17:52, 2 August 2018