Difference between revisions of "Team:Utrecht/testpage"

Line 133: Line 133:
  
 
$(document).ready(function(){
 
$(document).ready(function(){
−
changeContent(1);
+
changeContent(2);
 
resetCalender();
 
resetCalender();
 
});  
 
});  
Line 150: Line 150:
 
  <!-- Tab links -->
 
  <!-- Tab links -->
 
<div class="tab">
 
<div class="tab">
−
  <button id = "tabI" onclick='changeContent(1)'>Interlab</button>
 
 
   <button id = "tabR" onclick='changeContent(2)'>Receptor Assay</button>
 
   <button id = "tabR" onclick='changeContent(2)'>Receptor Assay</button>
 
   <button id = "tabB" onclick='changeContent(3)'>BRET Assay</button>
 
   <button id = "tabB" onclick='changeContent(3)'>BRET Assay</button>
Line 161: Line 160:
 
<div class="calenderContainer">
 
<div class="calenderContainer">
  
−
<!-- Calender Interlab --------------------------------------------------------------
 
−
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
 
−
<div id="monthHeaderI" class="monthHeader">
 
−
<h1> Interlab </h1>
 
−
 
−
<div class="month" id = "monthIA">
 
−
    <div onclick="createMonth(30, 5, inactiveSeptember, 'S');" class="next">&#10095;</div>
 
−
    <div>August</div>
 
−
</div>
 
−
 
−
<div class="month" id = "monthIS">
 
−
    <div onclick="createMonth(31, 2, inactiveAugust, 'A');" class="prev">&#10094;</div>
 
−
    <div>September</div>
 
−
</div>
 
−
 
−
</div>
 
  
 
<!-- Calender Receptor Assay --------------------------------------------------------------
 
<!-- Calender Receptor Assay --------------------------------------------------------------
Line 335: Line 318:
 
<ul>
 
<ul>
 
<li>Device 3 (number 5) showed a low GFP expression, so it was tried to re-preform the tranformation. Negative control of the interlab (number 1) was not performed last time due to lack of LBC plates so was also performed. </li>
 
<li>Device 3 (number 5) showed a low GFP expression, so it was tried to re-preform the tranformation. Negative control of the interlab (number 1) was not performed last time due to lack of LBC plates so was also performed. </li>
−
<li><a href = "https://2018.igem.org/Team:Utrecht/Protocol#Transformation">protocol Transformation</a></li>
+
<li><a href = "https://2018.igem.org/Team:Utrecht/Protocol#Transformation">Protocol Transformation</a></li>
 
</ul>
 
</ul>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 21:20, 6 October 2018


PLACEHOLDER

Receptor Assay

July
August
September

BRET Assay

July
August
September

Methylation Assay

July
August
September
Mo
Tu
We
Th
Fr
Sa
Su

Morning

Performed Calibration 1, 2, and 3 according to protocol. All measurements were performed using the plate reader of Seino.

Table 1. content 96 wells plate cal.1 and cal.2
123456789101112
ALdd
BLdd
CLdd
DLdd
E MSdddddddddddd dddddddddd
FMSdddddddddddd dddddddddd
G MSdddddddddddddddddddddd
H MSdddddddddddddddddddddd
Calibration 1
  • L= 100 uL Ludox CL-X (stored at 4C)
  • dd= 100 uL ddH20
  • Measurement: Abs600, turn off pathlength correction
Calibration 2
  • MS= 200 ul Microsphere Stock Solution
  • dd= 100 uL ddH20
  • green= serial dilution was performed with a micropipet from E1,F1,G1,H1 - E11,F11,G11,H11 by a volume of 100uL. Before every transfer solution was pipetted up and down 3x, after every transfer tips were discharged.
  • Measurement: Abs600, re-mix befor putting in plate reader and prevent bubbles, path length correction off
Calibration 3
  • 1xFC= 200 mL 1xFC (100uL 10x fluorescein + 900ul 1x PBS pH 7.4, tube was covered with foil
  • P= 100 uL 1x PBS pH 7.4
  • green= serial dilution was performed with a micropipet from A1,B1,C1,D1 - A11,B11,C11,D11 by a volume of 100uL. Before every transfer solution was pipetted up and down 3x, after every transfer tips were discharged.
  • Measurement: FL, 530nm/30nm bandpass, 25-30nm with recommened excitation of 485nm, emission 520-530nm of the filter. Path length correction was turned off
Table 2. content 96 wells plate cal.3
123456789101112
A1xFCPPPPPPPPPPP
B1xFCPPPPPPPPPPP
C1xFCPPPPPPPPPPP
D1xFCPPPPPPPPPPP
E
F
G
H

Afternoon

LBC plates were made according to the protocol used on the wall
  • 250ml LB 2x added to melted 250 ml WA 2x using a microwave
  • 0.5ml was added to final solution
  • plates were dried in 37C incubator
Transformation device 3 + negative control interlab study
  • Device 3 (number 5) showed a low GFP expression, so it was tried to re-preform the tranformation. Negative control of the interlab (number 1) was not performed last time due to lack of LBC plates so was also performed.
  • Protocol Transformation
lskdfjslkjgdlkdfjgldkjlakmflsvmclkxmfklmgdmlkcvmblcmkb
ksjdfljslfkdjlkghjfglhkjflhgkjflhgjflghjflghkjflhj
lskdfjslkjgdlkdfjgldkjlakmflsvmclkxmfklmgdmlkcvmblcmkb
ksjdfljslfkdjlkghjfglhkjflhgkjflhgjflghjflghkjflhj
lskdfjslkjgdlkdfjgldkjlakmflsvmclkxmfklmgdmlkcvmblcmkb
ksjdfljslfkdjlkghjfglhkjflhgkjflhgjflghjflghkjflhj
lskdfjslkjgdlkdfjgldkjlakmflsvmclkxmfklmgdmlkcvmblcmkb