Difference between revisions of "Team:SSHS-Shenzhen/Demonstrate"

Line 71: Line 71:
 
}
 
}
  
</style> </head>
+
.banner2{
 +
color:#fff;
 +
background-color:#5d8aa8;
 +
font-size:100px!important;
 +
width:100%; height:500px;
 +
text-align:center;
 +
line-height: 500px;
 +
padding:90px 0px 0px;
 +
background-image:url("https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/c1/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--test1.jpeg");
 +
}
 +
</style></head>
 
<body>
 
<body>
 
 
<div class="banner2">
 
<div class="banner2">
 
Demonstrate
 
Demonstrate
 
</div>
 
</div>
<br><br><br><br><br>
+
<h1>Our engineered system worked
 +
</h1>
  
 +
<h2>
 +
Methods
 +
<h2>
 +
 +
<p id="para">
 +
Adult P. striolata were obtained from Shenzhen University field station, and kept in glass bottles. The tissue culture seedlings of Chinese cabbage, Brassica chinensis leaves were placed into the above bottles (Fig. 5.1).
 +
</p>
  
 
<center>
 
<center>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/86/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--1005Final-Demonstration-SSHS-Shenzhen_new-1.jpg" width="80%" />
+
<div class="ibox">
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a5/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--1005Final-Demonstration-SSHS-Shenzhen_new-2.jpg" width="80%" />
+
<center><img src="
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/18/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--1005Final-Demonstration-SSHS-Shenzhen_new-3.jpg" width="80%" />
+
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/c5/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--Expb16.png
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/4d/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--1005Final-Demonstration-SSHS-Shenzhen_new-4.jpg" width="80%" />
+
" width="100%"></center>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/81/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--demon2-2.jpg" width="80%" />
+
<p id="note">
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/19/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--1005Final-Demonstration-SSHS-Shenzhen_new-6.jpg" width="80%" />
+
<b>
 +
Fig. 5.1
 +
</b>
 +
Adult P. striolata and Brassica chinensis leaves were placed into the glass bottles for RNAi efficiency test. Each siRNA/shRNA sample has two repeats.
 +
</p>
 +
</div>
 
</center>
 
</center>
 +
 +
<p id="para">
 +
The solutions of shRNA (10 ng/mL) were separately sprayed onto the leaves of Chinese cabbage every third day, each solution has two repeats. Around twenty adult beetles of P. striolata were tested per siRNA/shRNA sample.
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<h2>
 +
Results
 +
</h2>
 +
 +
<p id="para">
 +
The survival rates of adult beetles, were recorded at different days after shRNA treatment (Table 5-1).
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<center>
 +
<div class="ibox">
 +
<center><img src="
 +
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/0e/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--Expc2.png
 +
" width="100%"></center>
 +
<p id="note">
 +
<b>
 +
Table 5.1
 +
</b>
 +
RNAi efficiencies of siRNA/shRNA
 +
</p>
 +
</div>
 +
</center>
 +
 +
<p id="para">
 +
Different days of shRNA treatment were displayed in X axis, the survival rates of the beetles were displayed in Y axis. Results show that, except for the negative control: water and ALR-shRNA-1 sample, all the other samples tested could trigger RNAi mechanism, which was demonstrated by the significant survival rate decrease after treatment (Fig.5-2).
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<center>
 +
<div class="ibox">
 +
<center><img src="
 +
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/80/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--demo%E5%9B%BE1.jpg
 +
" width="100%"></center>
 +
<p id="note">
 +
<b>
 +
Fig. 5.2
 +
</b>
 +
The survival rate of Phyllotreta striolata at different days after siRNA/ shRNA treatment.
 +
</p>
 +
</div>
 +
</center>
 +
 +
<h2>Conclusions</h2>
 +
 +
<p id="para">The topical spray application of shRNA to a target insect is an effective, simple, safe and a relatively inexpensive technology for insect control.</p>
 +
 +
<h1>
 +
2. shRNA production cost
 +
</h1>
 +
<p id="para">
 +
For large scale production of our product by in vitro transcription system, the main cost includes: primers, NTPs and T7 polymerase. By calculating, the production cost for shRNA is $1.5/mg. <br>
 +
Basis for the calculation:
 +
 +
<h2>1) Primers for shRNA template synthesis. </h2>
 +
<p id="para">
 +
We need to order 2 primers, P1 38 (17+21) bases, and Primer 2, 29 (8+21) bases, the total primer bases is 67. The price for primer synthesis is one dollar for 14 bases (100 ul, 100pM), with 1ul primer, we get 20ul template, 1ul template we get 10ug shRNA. Cost for one primer ordering is ~ $5 (67/14), for one ordering, we get 20 mg shRNA (100 x 20 x 10 ug = 20000 ug). So, to produce 1 mg shRNA, the cost for primers is $ 0.25 ($5/20mg)
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<h2>2) NTPs for template synthesis and in vitro transcription. </h2>
 +
<p id="para">
 +
The price for NTP is 20 Dollar for 1ml, 40mM. For 20 dollars NTP, we get around 20 mg NTP (0.0001L x 40mM x 500 mg/mM = 20 mg), only a very small portion of NTP is used for template production. So, to produce 1 mg shRNA, the cost for NTP is $ 1 ($20/20mg)
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<h2>3) T7 polymerase.</h2>
 +
<p id="para">
 +
We will use E coli expression system to produce T7 polymerase, the cost is very low, no more than 0.25 dollars cost for making 1 mg of shRNA. Thus, the total cost for producing 1 mg of shRNA is $1.5 (0.25 + 1 + 0.25)
 +
</p>
 +
 +
 +
<center>
 +
<div class="ibox">
 +
<center><img src="
 +
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/88/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--demo%E5%9B%BE7.jpg
 +
"width="100%"></center>
 +
<center><img src="
 +
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/41/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--demo%E5%9B%BE8.jpg
 +
"width="100%"></center>
 +
<p id="note">
 +
<b>
 +
Table 1
 +
</b>
 +
Comparison of the cost and safety for using chemical pesticide and shRNA
 +
</p>
 +
</div>
 +
</center>
 +
 +
 +
<h1>
 +
3. Reducing application cost by using Phyllotreta striolata attractants
 +
</h1>
 +
 +
<h2>
 +
Objectives
 +
</h2>
 +
 +
<p id="para">
 +
We intend to reduce the application cost by using Phyllotreta striolata attractants. The idea is to add attractants to shRNA solution to trap Phyllotreta striolata. In this way we do not have to spray our product on all the vegetables in the fields. Instead, we could use attactant included shRNA solution, or  use vegetables that have been sprayed with attactant included shRNA solution to trap Phyllotreta striolata. and kill the beetles there.
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<h2>
 +
Methods
 +
</h2>
 +
 +
<p id="para">
 +
we chose two potential attractants to test, which are lemon yellow and sucrose. Both are safe and relatively cheap. Chinese flowering cabbages were placed in nylon net cages, one set of the cabbages were sprayed with attractants, another set of cabbages were sprayed with water were and placed in the same cage as control (Fig. 1).
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<center>
 +
<div class="ibox">
 +
<center><img src="
 +
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/02/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--demo%E5%9B%BE2.jpg
 +
" width="100%"></center>
 +
<p id="note">
 +
<b>
 +
Fig. 1
 +
</b>
 +
Chinese flowering cabbages that were sprayed with water or lemon yellow were placed in nylon net cages
 +
</p>
 +
</div>
 +
</center>
 +
 +
<p id="para">
 +
Each attractant is tested in a separate cage. Around 30 adult beetles were released into each cage, let the beetles stayed in the cages for 2 days (Fig. 2).
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<center>
 +
<div class="ibox">
 +
<center><img src="
 +
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/ae/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--demo%E5%9B%BE3.jpg
 +
" width="100%"></center>
 +
<p id="note">
 +
<b>
 +
Fig. 2
 +
</b>
 +
Lemon yellow and lemon yellow plus sucrose were tested in a separate cage
 +
</p>
 +
</div>
 +
</center>
 +
 +
<h2>
 +
Results
 +
</h2>
 +
<p id="para">
 +
After 2 days, we found more beetles were attracted to the cabbages that were sprayed with lemon yellow compared to the cabbages that were sprayed with water, which was demonstrated by the ratio of biting holes on the leaves (Fig.3). There were 125 holes on the leaves that were sprayed with lemon yellow, while 60 holes on the leaves that were sprayed with water. The ratio of holes is 2.08 (Table 1).
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<center>
 +
<div class="ibox">
 +
<center><img src="
 +
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/ff/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--demo%E5%9B%BE4.jpg
 +
" width="100%"></center>
 +
<p id="note">
 +
<b>
 +
Fig. 3
 +
</b>
 +
Lemon yellow has the function of attracting Phyllotreta striolata.
 +
</p>
 +
</div>
 +
</center>
 +
 +
<p id="para">
 +
When we added sucrose to the lemon yellow, trapping effect was even better, more beetles were attracted by the attractants, which again was indicated by the increase of the ratio of the biting holes (Fig.4). there were 227 holes on the leaves that were sprayed with lemon yellow plus sucrose, while 53 holes on the leaves that were sprayed with water. The ratio of holes is 4.28 point zero eight (Table 1)
 +
</p>
 +
 +
<center>
 +
<div class="ibox">
 +
<center><img src="
 +
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/5c/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--demo%E5%9B%BE5.jpg
 +
" width="100%"></center>
 +
<p id="note">
 +
<b>
 +
Fig. 4
 +
</b>
 +
  Lemon yellow plus sucrose has better effect in attracting Phyllotreta striolata.
 +
</p>
 +
</div>
 +
</center>
 +
 +
<center>
 +
<div class="ibox">
 +
<center><img src="
 +
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/53/T--SSHS-Shenzhen--demo%E5%9B%BE6.jpg
 +
" width="100%"></center>
 +
<p id="note">
 +
<b>
 +
Table 1
 +
</b>
 +
Comparison of the trapping effects of lemon yellow and lemon yellow plus sucrose.
 +
</p>
 +
</div>
 +
</center>
 +
 +
<h2>
 +
Conclusion:
 +
</h2>
 +
<p id="para">
 +
Based on the data from our experiments, solution of sucrose plus lemon yellow have the best trapping effect on Phyllotreta striolata.
 +
</p>
 +
 
</body>
 
</body>
 
</html>
 
</html>
 
 
<br><br><br><br><br>
 
<br><br><br><br><br>

Revision as of 07:36, 13 October 2018

Title

Title
Demonstrate

Our engineered system worked

Methods

Adult P. striolata were obtained from Shenzhen University field station, and kept in glass bottles. The tissue culture seedlings of Chinese cabbage, Brassica chinensis leaves were placed into the above bottles (Fig. 5.1).

Fig. 5.1 Adult P. striolata and Brassica chinensis leaves were placed into the glass bottles for RNAi efficiency test. Each siRNA/shRNA sample has two repeats.

The solutions of shRNA (10 ng/mL) were separately sprayed onto the leaves of Chinese cabbage every third day, each solution has two repeats. Around twenty adult beetles of P. striolata were tested per siRNA/shRNA sample.

Results

The survival rates of adult beetles, were recorded at different days after shRNA treatment (Table 5-1).

Table 5.1 RNAi efficiencies of siRNA/shRNA

Different days of shRNA treatment were displayed in X axis, the survival rates of the beetles were displayed in Y axis. Results show that, except for the negative control: water and ALR-shRNA-1 sample, all the other samples tested could trigger RNAi mechanism, which was demonstrated by the significant survival rate decrease after treatment (Fig.5-2).

Fig. 5.2 The survival rate of Phyllotreta striolata at different days after siRNA/ shRNA treatment.

Conclusions

The topical spray application of shRNA to a target insect is an effective, simple, safe and a relatively inexpensive technology for insect control.

2. shRNA production cost

For large scale production of our product by in vitro transcription system, the main cost includes: primers, NTPs and T7 polymerase. By calculating, the production cost for shRNA is $1.5/mg.
Basis for the calculation:

1) Primers for shRNA template synthesis.

We need to order 2 primers, P1 38 (17+21) bases, and Primer 2, 29 (8+21) bases, the total primer bases is 67. The price for primer synthesis is one dollar for 14 bases (100 ul, 100pM), with 1ul primer, we get 20ul template, 1ul template we get 10ug shRNA. Cost for one primer ordering is ~ $5 (67/14), for one ordering, we get 20 mg shRNA (100 x 20 x 10 ug = 20000 ug). So, to produce 1 mg shRNA, the cost for primers is $ 0.25 ($5/20mg)

2) NTPs for template synthesis and in vitro transcription.

The price for NTP is 20 Dollar for 1ml, 40mM. For 20 dollars NTP, we get around 20 mg NTP (0.0001L x 40mM x 500 mg/mM = 20 mg), only a very small portion of NTP is used for template production. So, to produce 1 mg shRNA, the cost for NTP is $ 1 ($20/20mg)

3) T7 polymerase.

We will use E coli expression system to produce T7 polymerase, the cost is very low, no more than 0.25 dollars cost for making 1 mg of shRNA. Thus, the total cost for producing 1 mg of shRNA is $1.5 (0.25 + 1 + 0.25)

Table 1 Comparison of the cost and safety for using chemical pesticide and shRNA

3. Reducing application cost by using Phyllotreta striolata attractants

Objectives

We intend to reduce the application cost by using Phyllotreta striolata attractants. The idea is to add attractants to shRNA solution to trap Phyllotreta striolata. In this way we do not have to spray our product on all the vegetables in the fields. Instead, we could use attactant included shRNA solution, or use vegetables that have been sprayed with attactant included shRNA solution to trap Phyllotreta striolata. and kill the beetles there.

Methods

we chose two potential attractants to test, which are lemon yellow and sucrose. Both are safe and relatively cheap. Chinese flowering cabbages were placed in nylon net cages, one set of the cabbages were sprayed with attractants, another set of cabbages were sprayed with water were and placed in the same cage as control (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 Chinese flowering cabbages that were sprayed with water or lemon yellow were placed in nylon net cages

Each attractant is tested in a separate cage. Around 30 adult beetles were released into each cage, let the beetles stayed in the cages for 2 days (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2 Lemon yellow and lemon yellow plus sucrose were tested in a separate cage

Results

After 2 days, we found more beetles were attracted to the cabbages that were sprayed with lemon yellow compared to the cabbages that were sprayed with water, which was demonstrated by the ratio of biting holes on the leaves (Fig.3). There were 125 holes on the leaves that were sprayed with lemon yellow, while 60 holes on the leaves that were sprayed with water. The ratio of holes is 2.08 (Table 1).

Fig. 3 Lemon yellow has the function of attracting Phyllotreta striolata.

When we added sucrose to the lemon yellow, trapping effect was even better, more beetles were attracted by the attractants, which again was indicated by the increase of the ratio of the biting holes (Fig.4). there were 227 holes on the leaves that were sprayed with lemon yellow plus sucrose, while 53 holes on the leaves that were sprayed with water. The ratio of holes is 4.28 point zero eight (Table 1)

Fig. 4 Lemon yellow plus sucrose has better effect in attracting Phyllotreta striolata.

Table 1 Comparison of the trapping effects of lemon yellow and lemon yellow plus sucrose.

Conclusion:

Based on the data from our experiments, solution of sucrose plus lemon yellow have the best trapping effect on Phyllotreta striolata.