Difference between revisions of "Team:Munich/engineering2.html"

Line 22: Line 22:
 
     </tr>
 
     </tr>
 
  <tr>
 
  <tr>
       <td>Results:</td>
+
       <td><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Munich/Results" target="_blank">Results:</a></td>
 
       <td>colonies only on E. Coli MG1655 plate;
 
       <td>colonies only on E. Coli MG1655 plate;
 
No colonies on E. Coli Rosetta
 
No colonies on E. Coli Rosetta
Line 47: Line 47:
 
     </tr>
 
     </tr>
 
  <tr>
 
  <tr>
       <td>Results:</td>
+
       <td><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Munich/Results" target="_blank">Results:</a></td>
 
       <td>red colonies. Elena (Advisor) and Dominic decided to repeat the experiment but to do a dpnI digest before to get rid of the template DNA.
 
       <td>red colonies. Elena (Advisor) and Dominic decided to repeat the experiment but to do a dpnI digest before to get rid of the template DNA.
 
</td>
 
</td>
Line 73: Line 73:
 
     </tr>
 
     </tr>
 
  <tr>
 
  <tr>
       <td>Results:</td>
+
       <td><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Munich/Results" target="_blank">Results:</a></td>
 
       <td>red colonies on all plates -> mRFP contamination
 
       <td>red colonies on all plates -> mRFP contamination
 
</td>
 
</td>
Line 100: Line 100:
 
     </tr>
 
     </tr>
 
  <tr>
 
  <tr>
       <td>Results:</td>
+
       <td><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Munich/Results" target="_blank">Results:</a></td>
 
       <td>CAP_recBCD 18ng/ul
 
       <td>CAP_recBCD 18ng/ul
 
CAP_msbB 12ng/ul
 
CAP_msbB 12ng/ul
Line 125: Line 125:
 
     </tr>
 
     </tr>
 
  <tr>
 
  <tr>
       <td>Results:</td>
+
       <td><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Munich/Results" target="_blank">Results:</a></td>
 
       <td>colonies on both plates  
 
       <td>colonies on both plates  
  
Line 159: Line 159:
 
     </tr>
 
     </tr>
 
  <tr>
 
  <tr>
       <td>Results:</td>
+
       <td><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Munich/Results" target="_blank">Results:</a></td>
 
       <td>all 5 picked colonies were positive for the insertion of the selection cassette PIC
 
       <td>all 5 picked colonies were positive for the insertion of the selection cassette PIC
 
</td>
 
</td>

Revision as of 13:50, 16 October 2018

Transforming E. Coli Rosetta and MG1655 for pRED/ET engineering

2018/08/28
Participants: Dominic Schwarz
Protocol: Electrocompetent transformation
Notes: Genetic engineering is planned in E. Coli Rosetta, MG1655 is E.Coli WT as backup.
Results: colonies only on E. Coli MG1655 plate; No colonies on E. Coli Rosetta

pRED/ET genome engineering of delta msb-B and delta recBCD strains

2018/08/29
Participants: Dominic Schwarz
Protocol: pRED/ET engineering protocol
Notes: the template for the resistance cassette for deletions was taken from a plasmid containing mRFP
Results: red colonies. Elena (Advisor) and Dominic decided to repeat the experiment but to do a dpnI digest before to get rid of the template DNA.

Transforming E. Coli DH5a to find a reason for the contamination

2018/08/30
Participants: Dominic Schwarz
Protocol: Electrocompetent transformation
Notes: CAP_recBCD, CAP_msbb, psb1c3_mrfp in Dh5a
Results: red colonies on all plates -> mRFP contamination

Creating a selection cassette from pSB1C3

2018/08/30
Participants: Dominic Schwarz
Protocol: Restrition digest, PCR purification
Notes: DpnI
Results: CAP_recBCD 18ng/ul CAP_msbB 12ng/ul

pRED/ET genome engineering of delta msb-B and delta recBCD strains

2018/09/01
Participants: Dominic Schwarz
Protocol: pRED/ET engineering protocol
Notes: the template for the resistance cassette for deletions was taken from a plasmid containing mRFP
Results: colonies on both plates

Verifying deletion strains of E. Coli MG1655

2018/09/05
Participants: Dominic Schwarz
Protocol: Colony PCR, Agarose gel
Notes: Primers: VF2, geno_msb-B_rv, geno_recBCD_rv; Ta: 48°C t= 1kb/min
RecBCD: 1,2,3,4,5
msbB: 35,36,37,38,39 expected: RecBCD 443bp Expected: msb-B 574bp
Results: all 5 picked colonies were positive for the insertion of the selection cassette PIC
awesome gel.
sick caption