Difference between revisions of "Team:Uppsala/Phage Display"

Line 612: Line 612:
 
<h1>Conclusions</h1>
 
<h1>Conclusions</h1>
 
<p>
 
<p>
Due to the fact that our ELISA-test was inconclusive we can not be sure that our peptides are specific binders. However, only one was predicted as a Polysterene binder and none contain any known TUP-sequences. A blastp on Biopanning Databank showed that EF01122224 showed some similarities with an antibody for a pork tapeworm epithelial proteins and EF01122218 for an antibody for rabbit epithelia. The E-values were high, 185  and 10 respectively. These two would be promising candidates for future studies.
+
Due to the fact that our ELISA-test was inconclusive we can not be sure that our peptides are specific binders. However, only one was predicted as a Polysterene binder and none contain any known TUP-sequences. A blastp on Biopanning Databank showed that EF01122224 showed some similarities with an antibody for a pork tapeworm epithelial proteins and EF01122218 for an antibody for rabbit epithelia. The E-values were high, 185  and 10 respectively, but those two would be promising candidates for future studies.  
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 14:58, 16 October 2018