Javisyquia (Talk | contribs) |
Javisyquia (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<img style="display:block ;margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; width:25%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/48/T--Stanford-Brown-RISD--Logo.png"> | <img style="display:block ;margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; width:25%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/48/T--Stanford-Brown-RISD--Logo.png"> | ||
− | < | + | <h1>Applied Design</h1> |
− | + | <p>The primary problems with martian habitat development are the cost of sending materials up to mars–it costs approximately $2.78 million dollars to send a single kilogram of material up to space [1]–and access to new materials when in space.</p> | |
</div> | </div> | ||
− | + | <div class="column third_size"> | |
− | < | + | <img style="display:block ;margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; width: 80%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/18/T--Stanford-Brown-RISD--AppliedDesign_3Dhabitat.jpeg"> |
− | + | <p style="text-align: center; font-size: 98%">Proposed 3D Printed Design crafted from a composite from Mars. [2]</p> | |
− | < | + | <img style="display:block ;margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto; width: 80%;" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/thumb/5/53/T--Stanford-Brown-RISD--AppliedDesign_Icehabitat.jpeg/1599px-T--Stanford-Brown-RISD--AppliedDesign_Icehabitat.jpeg"> |
− | + | <p style="text-align: center; font-size: 98%">Proposed 3D Printed Design crafted from a Martian Ice. [3]</p> | |
− | + | ||
− | < | + | |
− | < | + | |
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
+ | <div class="column two_thrids_size"> | ||
+ | <p>Current ideas that are being explore by NASA involve sending large 3D printers up to Mars that will print with materials sourced from Mars. More specific examples include a composite material made from martian regolith, or using ice found on planet [2, 3]. However, as we interviewed Dr. Michael Meyer, the lead Scientist of NASA’s Mars exploration program, it was highlighted that there are number of issues with these designs. Issues range from designing reliable material from components sourced from Mars to the cost of sending up such a large 3D printer (both in the production of such a large printer, as well as the actual cost per kilogram). Additionally, the materials sourced from Mars would most likely need to be supplemented with binders brought from earth, and could not be applied to interior design elements. </p> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
</html> | </html> |
Revision as of 02:25, 17 October 2018
Applied Design
The primary problems with martian habitat development are the cost of sending materials up to mars–it costs approximately $2.78 million dollars to send a single kilogram of material up to space [1]–and access to new materials when in space.
Proposed 3D Printed Design crafted from a composite from Mars. [2]
Proposed 3D Printed Design crafted from a Martian Ice. [3]
Current ideas that are being explore by NASA involve sending large 3D printers up to Mars that will print with materials sourced from Mars. More specific examples include a composite material made from martian regolith, or using ice found on planet [2, 3]. However, as we interviewed Dr. Michael Meyer, the lead Scientist of NASA’s Mars exploration program, it was highlighted that there are number of issues with these designs. Issues range from designing reliable material from components sourced from Mars to the cost of sending up such a large 3D printer (both in the production of such a large printer, as well as the actual cost per kilogram). Additionally, the materials sourced from Mars would most likely need to be supplemented with binders brought from earth, and could not be applied to interior design elements.