Alexkata15 (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div class="column full_size"> | <div class="column full_size"> | ||
<h1>Results</h1> | <h1>Results</h1> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p> </p> |
− | <p> | + | <p>Although the Berkeley Test Cells showed a possible increase in fluorescence when exposed to sound, further testing must be done to determine the if the parts are truly responding to sound. The data will be presented at the Jamboree. The Berkeley promoter BBa_K112402 was found to be a constitutive promoter, this promoter also shows a possible RFP upregulation when exposed to sound however further testing needs to be done to determine if it is actually audio inducible. The FSU iGEM promoters: BamE, OsmC, PspA, and ZntA also showed a possible increase in fluorescence, the data will also be presented at the Jamboree. </p> |
+ | |||
+ | <p>The BIOFAB parts also showed an incremental increase like we were expecting, however, it is interesting because the incremental increase was not in the order that we were expecting. The apFAB46 showed the lowest activity but was expected to be the highest. ApFAB90 was found to have medium expression, however, was expected to be low activity. Finally, apFAB82 showed the highest fluorescence, however, was expected to be the medium expression. Further investigation is needed to determine these unexpected results. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 03:41, 17 October 2018
Results
Although the Berkeley Test Cells showed a possible increase in fluorescence when exposed to sound, further testing must be done to determine the if the parts are truly responding to sound. The data will be presented at the Jamboree. The Berkeley promoter BBa_K112402 was found to be a constitutive promoter, this promoter also shows a possible RFP upregulation when exposed to sound however further testing needs to be done to determine if it is actually audio inducible. The FSU iGEM promoters: BamE, OsmC, PspA, and ZntA also showed a possible increase in fluorescence, the data will also be presented at the Jamboree.
The BIOFAB parts also showed an incremental increase like we were expecting, however, it is interesting because the incremental increase was not in the order that we were expecting. The apFAB46 showed the lowest activity but was expected to be the highest. ApFAB90 was found to have medium expression, however, was expected to be low activity. Finally, apFAB82 showed the highest fluorescence, however, was expected to be the medium expression. Further investigation is needed to determine these unexpected results.
What should this page contain?
- Clearly and objectively describe the results of your work.
- Future plans for the project.
- Considerations for replicating the experiments.
Describe what your results mean
- Interpretation of the results obtained during your project. Don't just show a plot/figure/graph/other, tell us what you think the data means. This is an important part of your project that the judges will look for.
- Show data, but remember all measurement and characterization data must be on part pages in the Registry.
- Consider including an analysis summary section to discuss what your results mean. Judges like to read what you think your data means, beyond all the data you have acquired during your project.
Project Achievements
You can also include a list of bullet points (and links) of the successes and failures you have had over your summer. It is a quick reference page for the judges to see what you achieved during your summer.
- A list of linked bullet points of the successful results during your project
- A list of linked bullet points of the unsuccessful results during your project. This is about being scientifically honest. If you worked on an area for a long time with no success, tell us so we know where you put your effort.
Inspiration
See how other teams presented their results.