Difference between revisions of "Team:Uppsala/Improve"

Line 183: Line 183:
 
                             <!-- Here you put your paragraphs -->  
 
                             <!-- Here you put your paragraphs -->  
 
                             <p><p>In 2011 the iGEM Uppsala team managed to create an amilCP biobrick (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K592009"><strong>BBa_K592009</strong></a>), a great addition to the iGEM repository of chromoproteins. When the part, which originates from a coral named <i>Acropora millepora</i>, gets expressed it produces a strong natural blue color that is very much visible to the naked eye [1].<br><br>  
 
                             <p><p>In 2011 the iGEM Uppsala team managed to create an amilCP biobrick (<a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K592009"><strong>BBa_K592009</strong></a>), a great addition to the iGEM repository of chromoproteins. When the part, which originates from a coral named <i>Acropora millepora</i>, gets expressed it produces a strong natural blue color that is very much visible to the naked eye [1].<br><br>  
                             In 2017, the University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin) iGEM Team decided to improve the part hoping for stronger expression resulting from codon optimization. By performing codon optimization they hypothesized that the seemingly unstable amilCP from 2011 would become more stable resulting in less white cultures on the plate, hence higher protein yield. The output part after optimization can be found in the registry as <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2253002"><strong>BBa_K2253002</strong>  </a> [2].</p>
+
                             In 2017, the University of Texas at Austin (UT Austin) iGEM Team decided to improve the part hoping for stronger expression resulting from codon optimization. By performing codon optimization they hypothesized that the seemingly unstable amilCP from 2011 would become more stable resulting in less white cultures on the plate, hence higher protein yield. The output part after optimization can be found in the registry as <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2253002"><strong>BBa_K2253002</strong>  </a> [2].<br><br>
 +
                            Figure 2 shows one single successful transformed colony of the UT Austin codon-optimized amilCP. In addition we can never know for sure if Austin Texas 2017 iGEM Team's optimization actually is better than the original part since a direct comparison in a picture is missing on both the wiki and the part registry.</p>
 
                             <br>
 
                             <br>
  
Line 191: Line 192:
 
                           <!-- Here goes the big image to the right -->  
 
                           <!-- Here goes the big image to the right -->  
 
                           <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/6e/T--Uppsala--Austin_Texas-AmilCP.png" id="figure1">
 
                           <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/6e/T--Uppsala--Austin_Texas-AmilCP.png" id="figure1">
                             <p><strong>Figure 1.</strong> The image to the right shows various streak colonies from the original blue chromoprotein, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K592009"><strong>BBa_K592009</strong></a>. Both phenotypically blue and clear colonies grew, supporting the hypothesis that the chromoprotein gene is unstable during cell growth, i.e. there is strong selection for cells carrying the resistance plasmid with a mutation that prevents expression of the chromoprotein due to its fitness cost. Plates were streaked by Microbe Hackers 2016 Chromoprotein Team [2]. </p>
+
                             <p><strong>Figure 1.</strong> The image above shows various streak colonies from the original blue chromoprotein, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K592009"><strong>BBa_K592009</strong></a>. Both phenotypically blue and clear colonies grew, supporting the hypothesis that the chromoprotein gene is unstable during cell growth, i.e. there is strong selection for cells carrying the resistance plasmid with a mutation that prevents expression of the chromoprotein due to its fitness cost. Plates were streaked by Microbe Hackers 2016 Chromoprotein Team [2]. </p>
 
                         </div>
 
                         </div>
  
Line 198: Line 199:
 
                 <!--End of template with side picture -->
 
                 <!--End of template with side picture -->
  
<p><br>Figure 2 shows one single successful transformed colony of the UT Austin codon-optimized amilCP. In addition we can never know for sure if Austin Texas 2017 iGEM Team's optimization actually is better than the original part since a direct comparison in a picture is missing on both the wiki and the part registry.</p>
+
 
  
 
<div class="content-card pic-next-to-text">
 
<div class="content-card pic-next-to-text">

Revision as of 18:38, 17 October 2018