Difference between revisions of "Team:Aix-Marseille/Skype"

 
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{Aix-Marseille|title=Skype Sessions}}
+
{{Aix-Marseille|title=Connecting with the iGEM community}}
  
−
Despite this important competition within the iGEM itself, access to collaborations between opposing teams has nonetheless served to enrich our notions about our project. We put aside our adversity to allow us to exchange advice, which has been of great mutual benefit to our team. We were able to establish a communication with two teams:
+
Despite this importance of competition within iGEM, access to collaborations with competeing teams has nonetheless served to enrich our notions about our project.  
 +
We put aside our adversity to allow us to exchange advice, which has been of great mutual benefit to our team. We were able to establish a communication with two teams.
  
−
The Bielfield team plans to recycle metals. This team explained to us how their research was going and how their team was involved in the wet lab. This allowed us to reflect on the organization of our team and the role of everyone in our project.
+
The [https://2018.igem.org/Team:Bielefeld-CeBiTec Bielefeld] team plans to recycle metals. This team explained to us how their research was going and how their team was involved in the wet lab. This allowed us to reflect on the organization of our team and the role of everyone in our project.
  
−
[[File:T--Aix-Marseille--skype2.jpg|600px|]]
+
[[File:T--Aix-Marseille--skype2.jpg|600px|center|]]
  
 +
The [https://2018.igem.org/Team:Leiden Leiden] team was working on the stress in bacteria. With them we were able to discuss the human practices part of our project. We told them about the different the events we had particiated in and those that were coming up. We were able to discuss the vision each team had of the importance of human practices and how we wanted to integrate it into our project.
  
−
The Leiden team working on the stress of bacteria. This time we were able to discuss the human practices part. We told them all the events we had done and those that remained to come and we were able to discuss the vision of each team on the importance of human practices and how we wanted to integrate it into our project.
+
[[File:T--Aix-Marseille--collab.jpg|600px|center|]]
  
−
[[File:T--Aix-Marseille--collab.jpg|600px|thumb|]]
+
Both these teams, although having different projets and subjects for the exchange, each contributed to advancing our project.
 +
The various contacts and exchanges we had with them confirmed the interest of ​​a universal and collective science.
 +
Each team ensures the completion of their project but has different concepts about research and all the teams and help each other, criticize, arguing and improve the result.
  
−
These two teams, although having different operations and demands, each contributed to advance our project.
+
We thank them for their advice!!
−
The various contacts and exchanges we had with them confirmed the very idea of ​​a universal and collective science. Although each ensures the completion of his project, each team with its different concepts and research can help the different teams, improving and arguing the possible questioning of different work.
+

Latest revision as of 02:14, 18 October 2018

HOME
TEAM
PROJECT
Description
Design
Experiments
Notebook
Protocols
InterLab
Model
Results
Perspectives
Safety
PARTS
Parts Overview
Basic Parts
Composite Parts
HUMAN PRACTICES
Integrated HP
Education & Engagement
Collaborations
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Sponsors
Attributions
Crowdfunding
JUDGING FORM ⇗

Connecting with the iGEM community

Despite this importance of competition within iGEM, access to collaborations with competeing teams has nonetheless served to enrich our notions about our project. We put aside our adversity to allow us to exchange advice, which has been of great mutual benefit to our team. We were able to establish a communication with two teams.

The Bielefeld team plans to recycle metals. This team explained to us how their research was going and how their team was involved in the wet lab. This allowed us to reflect on the organization of our team and the role of everyone in our project.

T--Aix-Marseille--skype2.jpg

The Leiden team was working on the stress in bacteria. With them we were able to discuss the human practices part of our project. We told them about the different the events we had particiated in and those that were coming up. We were able to discuss the vision each team had of the importance of human practices and how we wanted to integrate it into our project.

T--Aix-Marseille--collab.jpg

Both these teams, although having different projets and subjects for the exchange, each contributed to advancing our project. The various contacts and exchanges we had with them confirmed the interest of ​​a universal and collective science. Each team ensures the completion of their project but has different concepts about research and all the teams and help each other, criticize, arguing and improve the result.

We thank them for their advice!!