Team:SYSU-CHINA/Design







Design


Design
What We Do

This year, team SYSU-CHINA aims to provide a safer yet affordable CAR T therapy. Taken the shortcomings of the current methods into consideration, we reasoned that the following criteria is essential in order to develop an effective safe switch:

1.The inhibition is preferred to be confined to transferred T cells population alone.
2.The inhibition is reversible, meaning that the inhibition is achieved without killing the cells and the cells can be reactivated when drug is removed.
3.The safe switch is universal and is compatible with most of the mainstream, if not all, CAR receptors. It is also preferable that this safe switch can be used in TCR T cells.
4.The cost for the controlling method is low, without adding additional financial burden on the already expensive therapy.

With the criteria above, we developed a reversible safe switch based on the tet-inducible CMV promoter and U24 protein of Human Herpesvirus 6. By expressing U24 protein of under the control of tet-ON promoter, we can downregulate CAR molecules on the cell surface through endosomal recycling inhibition in the presence of doxycycline, an inexpensive drugs already approved by the FDA. This could potentially be used as a universal add-on for all CAR-Ts and TCR-Ts to ensure safety.

U24 protein from Human Herpesvirus 6

Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) of betaherpesvirus family is ubiquitous among the human population. Although both of its subtypes, HHV-6A and HHV-6B, may infect and persist in different peripheral blood mononuclear cells population, CD4+ T cells are believed to be their primary target (Lusso et al., 1988) . Similar to other viruses, HHV-6 encodes a variety of proteins for immune evasion, one of them is U24 protein.

U24 is a small (87aa) tail-anchored protein (Sullivan and Coscoy, 2010) that can downregulate TCR/CD3 complex from the cell surface by exclusion of CD3 from Rab11-containing recycling endosomes and thus inhibiting TCR complex recycling back to the surface(Sullivan and Coscoy, 2008). While it was demonstrated later that U24 also downregulate transferrin(Sullivan and Coscoy, 2010), its action is relatively specific, without affecting the surface level of ICAM-1, MHC class I, ULBP1, ULBP2, CD4 and CD8 (Sullivan and Coscoy, 2008). Since U24 does not colocalized with CD3, it is believed that the downregulation does not rely on the interaction of U24 with CD3 but instead results from interaction of U24 and the endosomal recycling machinery (Sullivan and Coscoy, 2010). In addition, unlike proteins from other herpesviruses that downregulate TCRs or B cell receptors (BCRs), U24 does not activate lymphocyte signaling pathways(Sullivan and Coscoy, 2008). Furthermore, it was demonstrated that U24 can impair T cell activation by antigen presenting cells(Sullivan and Coscoy, 2008).

In summary, U24 is able to relatively specifically downregulate TCRs from cell surface by interfering with endosomal recycling, a common pathway, and subsequently impair T cell activation. Considering the similarity of CAR receptors and the endogenous TCR/CD3 complex, we reasoned that U24 may also downregulate CARs from cell surface, and subsequently inhibit CAR T cells activation. In support with our hypothesis, it has been observed that anti-CD19 CAR also undergoes internalization and rapid recycling (Kalos et al., 2011). The ITAM motifs in TCR complex, which is believed to mediate TCR recycling (Liu et al., 2000), also presents in CARs. Furthermore, different surface CAR level can lead to activation signaling with different intensity (Walker et al., 2017).

In addition, the unique mechanism of U24 opens the possibility to construct a universal safe switch, for it targets a common pathway that affects potentially all CARs and TCRs, and thus effective in all CAR T cells and modified TCR T cells.

Tet-inducible transcription system (tet-ON system)

With the molecule for inhibition in mind, we next sought for a mechanism to regulate its function.

As a proof of principle, we first considered the Tet-inducible transcription system (Gossen et al., 1995) for it is well- characterized and the molecule for its induction is tetracycline (tet) or doxycycline (dox), two inexpensive antibiotics already approved by the FDA. The tet-ON system utilizes the sequence-specific DNA binding property of tet repressor protein (tetR) from Escherichia coli in the presence of tet or dox, and consists of two parts: The Tet-inducible CMV promoter (tet-ON promoter) and reverse tetracycline-controlled transactivator (rtTA). The tet-ON promoter consists of tandem tetracycline-responsive elements (TRE) followed by a minimal CMV promoter. The rtTA protein comprises of reverse-tetR (rtetR, mutant of tetR) and activation domains from herpes simplex virus VP16. When tet or dox is added, the rtTA binds to TRE, and VP16 domain will recruit factors of RNA polymerase II to initiate transcription. In the absence of tet or dox, the rtTA detaches from tet-ON promoter, and thus no transcription.


Overall Design

Taken together, our device works as follows:
In a CAR T cell with our device, the rtTA protein is constutively expressed, the U24 protein is expressed under the control of tet-ON promoter. In the absence of tet or dox, no U24 is expressed and CARs are internalized and recycled without disruption, ensuring enough CARs on the cell surface to recognize cancer cells. In the presence of dox, however, the rtTA binds to tet-on promoter, facilitating the expression of U24. U24 in turns inhibiting CAR recycling, resulting in a lower number of CARs on cell surface and thus inhibit CAR T cells function.


Reference

Gossen, M., Freundlieb, S., Bender, G., Muller, G., Hillen, W., and Bujard, H. (1995). Transcriptional activation by tetracyclines in mammalian cells. Science 268, 1766-1769.
Kalos, M., Levine, B.L., Porter, D.L., Katz, S., Grupp, S.A., Bagg, A., and June, C.H. (2011). T cells with chimeric antigen receptors have potent antitumor effects and can establish memory in patients with advanced leukemia. Science translational medicine 3, 95ra73.
Liu, H., Rhodes, M., Wiest, D.L., and Vignali, D.A. (2000). On the dynamics of TCR:CD3 complex cell surface expression and downmodulation. Immunity 13, 665-675.
Lusso, P., Markham, P.D., Tschachler, E., di Marzo Veronese, F., Salahuddin, S.Z., Ablashi, D.V., Pahwa, S., Krohn, K., and Gallo, R.C. (1988). In vitro cellular tropism of human B-lymphotropic virus (human herpesvirus-6). The Journal of experimental medicine 167, 1659-1670.
Sullivan, B.M., and Coscoy, L. (2008). Downregulation of the T-cell receptor complex and impairment of T-cell activation by human herpesvirus 6 u24 protein. Journal of virology 82, 602-608.
Sullivan, B.M., and Coscoy, L. (2010). The U24 protein from human herpesvirus 6 and 7 affects endocytic recycling. Journal of virology 84, 1265-1275.
Walker, A.J., Majzner, R.G., Zhang, L., Wanhainen, K., Long, A.H., Nguyen, S.M., Lopomo, P., Vigny, M., Fry, T.J., Orentas, R.J., et al. (2017). Tumor Antigen and Receptor Densities Regulate Efficacy of a Chimeric Antigen Receptor Targeting Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase. Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy 25, 2189-2201.