Difference between revisions of "Team:Hong Kong HKUST/InterLab"

Line 128: Line 128:
 
</table>  
 
</table>  
 
  </p>
 
  </p>
 +
<h2>Result:</h2>
 +
<p>
 +
<h2>Calibrations:</h2>
 +
Conversion factor of OD<sub>600</sub>(OD<sub>600</sub>/Abs<sub>600</sub>) = 3.036
 +
<table style="width:100%">
 +
  <tr>
 +
    <th>  </th>
 +
    <th>LUDOX CL-X</th>
 +
    <th>H<sub>2</sub>0</th>
 +
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
    <td>Replicate 1</td>
 +
    <td>0.045</td>
 +
    <td>0.024</td>
 +
 
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
    <td>Replicate 2</td>
 +
    <td>0.045</td>
 +
    <td>0.025</td>
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
    <td>Replicate 3</td>
 +
    <td>0.044</td>
 +
    <td>0.024</td>
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
    <td>Replicate 4</td>
 +
    <td>0.049</td>
 +
    <td>0.027</td>
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
    <td>Arithmethic mean</td>
 +
    <td>0.046</td>
 +
    <td>0.025</td>
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
    <td>Corrected Abs<sub>600</sub></td>
 +
    <td>0.021</td>
 +
   
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
  <td>Reference  OD<sub>600</sub></td>
 +
  <td>0.063</td> 
 +
  </tr>
 +
  <tr>
 +
    <td>OD<sub>600</sub>/Abs<sub>600</sub></td>
 +
    <td>3.036</td>
 +
  </tr>
 +
</table>
 +
<caption>Table2: Conversion factor calculation</caption>
 +
</p>
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/93/T--Hong_Kong_HKUST--Particlestandardcurve.png" class="img-fluid" alt="Responsive image">
 +
<figcaption>Fig. 2a Particle Standard Curve</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/2/23/T--Hong_Kong_HKUST--Particlestandardcurvelog.png" class="img-fluid" alt="Responsive image">
 +
<figcaption>Fig.2b Particle Standard Curve (log scale)
 +
</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/c/c0/T--Hong_Kong_HKUST--Fluoresceincurve.png" class="img-fluid" alt="Responsive image">
 +
<figcaption>Fig.3a Fluorescein standard curve</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/0a/T--Hong_Kong_HKUST--Fluoresceinlog.png" class="img-fluid" alt="Responsive image">
 +
<figcaption>Fig.3a Fluorescein standard curve (log scale)
 +
</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
<br>
 +
<h3>Converting between absorbance of cells to absorbance of a known concentration of beads.</h3>
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a7/T--Hong_Kong_HKUST--AverageuMInterlab.png" class="img-fluid" alt="Responsive image">
 +
<figcaption>Fig.4 Average <sub>u</sub>M Fluorescein / OD<sub>600</sub> of each devices
 +
</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
<figure>
 +
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/2/21/T--Hong_Kong_HKUST--AverageMEFL.png" class="img-fluid" alt="Responsive image">
 +
<figcaption>Fig.3a Fluorescein standard curve (log scale)
 +
</figcaption>
 +
</figure>
 +
<h2>Counting colony-forming units (CFUs) from the sample
 +
</h2><br/>
 +
 +
<p>
 +
Colonies count: <br/>
 +
Negative control (BBa_R0040):
 +
 +
<table>
 +
<tr>
 +
<th></th>
 +
<th>Dillution 3</th>
 +
<th>Dillution 4</th>
 +
<th>Dillution 5</th>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 1, Replicate 1</td>
 +
<td>180</td>
 +
<td>13</td>
 +
<td>3</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 1, Replicate 2</td>
 +
<td>120</td>
 +
<td>14</td>
 +
<td>3</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 1, Replicate 3</td>
 +
<td>197</td>
 +
<td>33</td>
 +
<td>2</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 2, Replicate 1</td>
 +
<td>283</td>
 +
<td>33</td>
 +
<td>2</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 2, Replicate 2</td>
 +
<td>214</td>
 +
<td>28</td>
 +
<td>3</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 2, Replicate 3</td>
 +
<td>218</td>
 +
<td>29</td>
 +
<td>1</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</table>
 +
 +
Positive control ((BBa_I120270):
 +
 +
<table>
 +
<tr>
 +
<th></th>
 +
<th>Dillution 3</th>
 +
<th>Dillution 4</th>
 +
<th>Dillution 5</th>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 1, Replicate 1</td>
 +
<td>228</td>
 +
<td>29</td>
 +
<td>1</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 1, Replicate 2</td>
 +
<td>184</td>
 +
<td>25</td>
 +
<td>1</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 1, Replicate 3</td>
 +
<td>153</td>
 +
<td>25</td>
 +
<td>1</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 2, Replicate 1</td>
 +
<td>254</td>
 +
<td>19</td>
 +
<td>3</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 2, Replicate 2</td>
 +
<td>168</td>
 +
<td>27</td>
 +
<td>2</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 2, Replicate 3</td>
 +
<td>213</td>
 +
<td>24</td>
 +
<td>3</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</table>
 +
 +
Colony-forming unit (CFU):
 +
Negative control (BBa_R0040):
 +
 +
<table>
 +
<tr>
 +
<th></th>
 +
<th>Dillution 3</th>
 +
<th>Dillution 4</th>
 +
<th>Dillution 5</th>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 1, Replicate 1</td>
 +
<td>1.44E+07</td>
 +
<td>1.04E+07</td>
 +
<td>2.40E+07</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 1, Replicate 2</td>
 +
<td>9.60E+06</td>
 +
<td>1.12E+07</td>
 +
<td>2.40E+07</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 1, Replicate 3</td>
 +
<td>1.58E+07</td>
 +
<td>2.64E+07</td>
 +
<td>1.60E+07</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 2, Replicate 1</td>
 +
<td>2.26E+07</td>
 +
<td>1.84E+07</td>
 +
<td>1.60E+07</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 2, Replicate 2</td>
 +
<td>1.71E+07</td>
 +
<td>2.24E+07</td>
 +
<td>2.40E+07</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
<td>Colony 2, Replicate 3</td>
 +
<td>1.74E+07</td>
 +
<td>2.32E+07</td>
 +
<td>8.00E+06</td>
 +
</tr>
 +
</table>
 +
Average <br>
 +
<ul>
 +
<li>Colony 1: 1.69E+07 CFU/ml/0.1OD</li>
 +
<li>Colony 2: 1.88E+07 CFU/ml/0.1OD</li>
 +
<li>Average: 1.785E+07 CFU/ml/0.1OD</li>
 +
<li>Using conversion factor OD/Abs= 3.036</li>
 +
<li>Conversion factor: CFU/Abs/ml= 54.34 CFU/Abs/ml</li>
 +
</ul>
 +
 +
</p>
 +
<h2>Conclusion:</h2>
 +
<p>
 +
Overall, the result obtained was reasonable. Among all device, device 1 reach overall highest fluorescence level while device show the lowest, the outcome is due to the different of promoter of GFP.  Since the strength of promoter of device affect the expression of GFP.  According to the Part Registry, promoter strength of device 1 (BBa_J23101), device 2 (BBa_J23106), device 3 (BBa_J23117), device 4 (BBa_J23100), device 5 (BBa_J23104) and device 6 (BBa_J23116) are 1791, 1185, 162, 2547, 1830 and 396 au respectively. This may explain the difference levels of GFP produced. 
 +
</p>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
Line 143: Line 386:
 
<div class="inner">
 
<div class="inner">
 
<header class="align-center">
 
<header class="align-center">
<p>Eleifend vitae urna</p>
+
<h2>Generic Page Template</h2>
+
<h2>REFERENCES:</h2>
  
 
</header>
 
</header>
Line 158: Line 401:
 
<div class="content">
 
<div class="content">
 
<header class="align-center">
 
<header class="align-center">
<p>maecenas sapien feugiat ex purus</p>
+
<h2>Lorem ipsum dolor</h2>
+
 
</header>
 
</header>
  
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/44/T--Hong_Kong_HKUST--_candidphoto-6.jpeg" class="img-fluid" alt="Responsive image">
 
  
<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras at dignissim augue, in iaculis neque. Etiam bibendum felis ac vulputate pellentesque. Cras non blandit quam. Nunc porta, est non posuere sagittis, neque nunc pellentesque diam, a iaculis lacus urna vitae purus. In non dui vel est tempor faucibus. Aliquam erat volutpat. Quisque vel est vitae nibh laoreet auctor. In nec libero dui. Nulla ullamcorper, dolor nec accumsan viverra, libero eros rutrum metus, vel lacinia magna odio non nunc. Praesent semper felis eu rhoncus aliquam. Donec at quam ac libero vestibulum pretium. Nunc faucibus vel arcu in malesuada. Aenean at velit odio. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Maecenas commodo erat eget molestie sollicitudin. Donec imperdiet, ex sed blandit dictum, ipsum metus ultrices arcu, vitae euismod nisl sapien vitae tortor.</p>
+
 
 +
<p>The 2018 International Genetically Engineered Machine. (17 July, 2018). Tracks/Measurement/Interlab study/Plate Reader Protocol. Retrieved from https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/09/2018_InterLab_Plate_Reader_Protocol.pdf
 +
</p>
 
 
<p>Vivamus nec odio ac ligula congue feugiat at vitae leo. Aenean sem justo, finibus sed dui eu, accumsan facilisis dolor. Fusce quis dui eget odio iaculis aliquam vel sed velit. Nulla pellentesque posuere semper. Nulla eu sagittis lorem, a auctor nulla. Sed ac condimentum orci, ac varius ante. Nunc blandit quam sit amet sollicitudin sodales.</p>
+
<p>Registry of Standard Biological Parts (2018-04-17) Retrieved  from http://parts.igem.org/assembly/plates.cgi?id=5641
 +
</p>
 
 
<p>Vivamus ultricies mollis mauris quis molestie. Quisque eu mi velit. In et cursus nibh. Donec facilisis, orci sed mollis hendrerit, nunc risus mattis odio, eget efficitur nisl orci a lectus. Aenean finibus neque convallis orci sollicitudin tincidunt. Vivamus lacinia facilisis diam, quis facilisis nisi luctus nec. Aliquam ac molestie enim, ut ultrices elit. Fusce laoreet vulputate risus in tincidunt. Sed commodo mollis maximus. Nullam varius laoreet nibh sit amet facilisis. Donec ac odio vehicula, consequat elit et, sodales justo. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Nullam ac auctor mauris, in hendrerit libero. </p>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 08:45, 13 October 2018

iGem HKUST 2018 Hielo by TEMPLATED
...

INTERLAB

OUR INTERLAB OBJECTIVES

The 2018 year iGEM interlab aimed at reducing Lab-to-lab variability in fluorescence measurement. Since in previous years interlab studies show that there are variation in measuring GFP expression level per cell. This large variability is the use of optical density (OD) as approximation of cell number. So this year the interlab will try in two ways: absolute cell count and colony forming units, to replace the use of OD.

Method:

All procedures are followed to the protocols iGEM given. Except the OD measurement was changed from OD600 to OD595, due to limited options of plate reader in HKUST. After contact with iGEM headquarter, we retain the data to be OD595.

Machines, materials and parts:

    Machines:


  • Envision Multilabel Reader

*To know more about the setting of EnVision multilabel reader, please click

  • LUDOX CL-X,/b>: 45% colloidal silica suspension, use as single reference point for converting absorbance (Abs600) to OD600.
  • Silica beads: Microsphere suspension that mimic the shape and size of typical E.coli cell. With known concentration, it is used as conversion of absorbance measurement to universal standard concentration of bead measurement.
  • Fluorescein: fluorescent molecules for create standard fluorescence curve.
  • E.coli strain DH5αCompetent cell: use for transformation, the protocol used for making it can view in here

parts:

Parts Parts location on the kits plate Parts used as the promoter(strength) Parts used as the RBS(Efficiency) Reporter Gene Parts used as the Terminator
Positive Control(BBa_I20270) Plate 7 Well 2B BBa_J23151 (nil) BBa_B0032 (0.3) GFP BBa_B0010, BBa_B0012
Negative Control (BBa_R0040) Plate 7 Well 2D BBa_R0040 (nil) nil
Test Device 1 (BBa_J364000) Plate 7 Well 2F BBa_J23101 (1791au) BBa_B0034 (1.0)
Test Device 2 (BBa_J364001) Plate 7 Well 2H BBa_J23106 (1185au)
Test Device 3 (BBa_J364002) Plate 7 Well 2J BBa_J23117 (162au)
Test Device 4 (BBa_J364007) Plate 7 Well 2L BBa_J23100(2547au) BBa_B0034* (nil)
Test Device 4 (BBa_J364007) Plate 7 Well 2L BBa_J23100(2547au) BBa_B0034* (nil)

Result:

Calibrations:

Conversion factor of OD600(OD600/Abs600) = 3.036
LUDOX CL-X H20
Replicate 1 0.045 0.024
Replicate 2 0.045 0.025
Replicate 3 0.044 0.024
Replicate 4 0.049 0.027
Arithmethic mean 0.046 0.025
Corrected Abs600 0.021
Reference OD600 0.063
OD600/Abs600 3.036
Table2: Conversion factor calculation

Responsive image
Fig. 2a Particle Standard Curve
Responsive image
Fig.2b Particle Standard Curve (log scale)
Responsive image
Fig.3a Fluorescein standard curve
Responsive image
Fig.3a Fluorescein standard curve (log scale)

Converting between absorbance of cells to absorbance of a known concentration of beads.

Responsive image
Fig.4 Average uM Fluorescein / OD600 of each devices
Responsive image
Fig.3a Fluorescein standard curve (log scale)

Counting colony-forming units (CFUs) from the sample


Colonies count:
Negative control (BBa_R0040):

Dillution 3 Dillution 4 Dillution 5
Colony 1, Replicate 1 180 13 3
Colony 1, Replicate 2 120 14 3
Colony 1, Replicate 3 197 33 2
Colony 2, Replicate 1 283 33 2
Colony 2, Replicate 2 214 28 3
Colony 2, Replicate 3 218 29 1
Positive control ((BBa_I120270):
Dillution 3 Dillution 4 Dillution 5
Colony 1, Replicate 1 228 29 1
Colony 1, Replicate 2 184 25 1
Colony 1, Replicate 3 153 25 1
Colony 2, Replicate 1 254 19 3
Colony 2, Replicate 2 168 27 2
Colony 2, Replicate 3 213 24 3
Colony-forming unit (CFU): Negative control (BBa_R0040):
Dillution 3 Dillution 4 Dillution 5
Colony 1, Replicate 1 1.44E+07 1.04E+07 2.40E+07
Colony 1, Replicate 2 9.60E+06 1.12E+07 2.40E+07
Colony 1, Replicate 3 1.58E+07 2.64E+07 1.60E+07
Colony 2, Replicate 1 2.26E+07 1.84E+07 1.60E+07
Colony 2, Replicate 2 1.71E+07 2.24E+07 2.40E+07
Colony 2, Replicate 3 1.74E+07 2.32E+07 8.00E+06
Average
  • Colony 1: 1.69E+07 CFU/ml/0.1OD
  • Colony 2: 1.88E+07 CFU/ml/0.1OD
  • Average: 1.785E+07 CFU/ml/0.1OD
  • Using conversion factor OD/Abs= 3.036
  • Conversion factor: CFU/Abs/ml= 54.34 CFU/Abs/ml

Conclusion:

Overall, the result obtained was reasonable. Among all device, device 1 reach overall highest fluorescence level while device show the lowest, the outcome is due to the different of promoter of GFP. Since the strength of promoter of device affect the expression of GFP. According to the Part Registry, promoter strength of device 1 (BBa_J23101), device 2 (BBa_J23106), device 3 (BBa_J23117), device 4 (BBa_J23100), device 5 (BBa_J23104) and device 6 (BBa_J23116) are 1791, 1185, 162, 2547, 1830 and 396 au respectively. This may explain the difference levels of GFP produced.

REFERENCES:

The 2018 International Genetically Engineered Machine. (17 July, 2018). Tracks/Measurement/Interlab study/Plate Reader Protocol. Retrieved from https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/09/2018_InterLab_Plate_Reader_Protocol.pdf

Registry of Standard Biological Parts (2018-04-17) Retrieved from http://parts.igem.org/assembly/plates.cgi?id=5641