Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
<figure style='padding-left: px;'> | <figure style='padding-left: px;'> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/38/T--William_and_Mary--pulse.png" width = " | + | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/38/T--William_and_Mary--pulse.png" width = "70%"/> |
<figcaption><div style='padding-left: 20%;padding-right:20%; padding-top: 15px; color: #808080; font-size: 14px;'> | <figcaption><div style='padding-left: 20%;padding-right:20%; padding-top: 15px; color: #808080; font-size: 14px;'> | ||
Figure 1: The results from our abstract IFFL model. When inputs are long (left), reporter concentration pulses at a fixed height in response to each input. When input lengths are shorter than the threshold time, each input pulse will generate a stepwise increase whose size is determined by pulse time. | Figure 1: The results from our abstract IFFL model. When inputs are long (left), reporter concentration pulses at a fixed height in response to each input. When input lengths are shorter than the threshold time, each input pulse will generate a stepwise increase whose size is determined by pulse time. | ||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div style='padding-top: 40px;'></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <div style = 'padding-right: 14%; padding-left: 14%; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;'> | ||
+ | The ultimate source of this behavior is the dynamics of the inhibitor; when inputs are short, the amount of inhibitor never crosses the threshold at which it efficiently degrades the output, leading to stepwise increases in the output. Conversely, when inputs are long the inhibitor crosses the threshold and reduces the concentration of the output. Importantly for our project, these results showed that IFFLs are capable of distinguishing the temporal properties of inputs, giving different outputs depending on the length of the input signal. That means that an IFFL can provide the basis for a system that is attempting to interpret dynamic, i.e. time encoded information. | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div style='padding-top: 30px;'></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div style = 'padding-left: 14%; padding-bottom: 10px;font-size: 25px' ><b>Creating a Protease Based IFFL:</b></div> | ||
+ | <div style='background: #808080; margin: 0px 14% 20px 14%; height:1px;></div> | ||
+ | <div style='padding-top: 0px;'></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <div style = 'padding-right: 14%; padding-left: 14%; text-indent: 50px;line-height: 25px;'> | ||
+ | With the knowledge that an IFFL would provide a suitable architecture for the construction of our decoder in hand, we decided to utilize a previously characterized IFFL system that utilizes the mf-Lon protease system [2,3]. In this system the mf-Lon protease acts as an inhibitor by degrading a reporter with a protein degradation tag (pdt) (Figure 2). | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div style='padding-top: 30px;'></div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <figure style='padding-left: px;'> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/c/c6/T--William_and_Mary--Lon_IFFL_structure.png" width = "70%"/> | ||
+ | <figcaption><div style='padding-left: 20%;padding-right:20%; padding-top: 15px; color: #808080; font-size: 14px;'> | ||
+ | Figure 2: Schematic of the dual inducible mScarlet-I-pdt mf-Lon IFFL system. Inducers act as independently tunable proxies for inputs and mf-Lon acts as an inhibitor of the reporter mScarlet-I pdt. | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div></figcaption> | ||
+ | </figure> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | <div style='padding-top: 40px;'></div> | ||
Revision as of 15:11, 17 October 2018
Results
Construction of an Abstract IFFL Model:
Based on our understanding that incoherent feedforward loops (IFFL) could serve as temporal distinguishers, the first goal of our project was to replicate the model from Zhang, et al. (2016)[1]. We constructed an abstract kinetics based IFFL model, and found that IFFLs are indeed temporal classifiers. We found that when an IFFL was given an oscillatory input signal it will give qualitatively different outputs depending on the length input signals (Figure 1). In the presence of long input signals, an IFFL will give output pulses of a fixed height, whereas in the presence of shorter input signals it will produce a staircase like output where the output concentration increases with each new input pulse.
The ultimate source of this behavior is the dynamics of the inhibitor; when inputs are short, the amount of inhibitor never crosses the threshold at which it efficiently degrades the output, leading to stepwise increases in the output. Conversely, when inputs are long the inhibitor crosses the threshold and reduces the concentration of the output. Importantly for our project, these results showed that IFFLs are capable of distinguishing the temporal properties of inputs, giving different outputs depending on the length of the input signal. That means that an IFFL can provide the basis for a system that is attempting to interpret dynamic, i.e. time encoded information.
Creating a Protease Based IFFL:
With the knowledge that an IFFL would provide a suitable architecture for the construction of our decoder in hand, we decided to utilize a previously characterized IFFL system that utilizes the mf-Lon protease system [2,3]. In this system the mf-Lon protease acts as an inhibitor by degrading a reporter with a protein degradation tag (pdt) (Figure 2).