(17 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/6c/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--tubestop_vk.png" style="width:100%"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/6c/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--tubestop_vk.png" style="width:100%"> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="sidenavi" id="side_bar"> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <li class="side_list"> | ||
+ | <a href="#phy">Phytochelatin synthase</a> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li class="side_list"> | ||
+ | <a href="#grow">Growth experiments</a> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li class="side_list"> | ||
+ | <a href="#via">Viability</a> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
<div class="container"> | <div class="container"> | ||
Line 61: | Line 76: | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | In our experiments to improve the tolerance of <i>Escherichia coli</i> DH5α to heavy metals, we created a collection of several composite parts designed to combat oxidative stress. These parts mainly convey the ability to dismutate the superoxide anion and its secondary products like hydrogen peroxide into nontoxic forms. We were able to demonstrate that cells carrying our construct BBa_K2638118, containing the superoxide dismutase A and catalase under the control of a strong RBS and the pBAD promoter on pSB1C3, or BBa_K2638112, containing the glutathione | + | In our experiments to improve the tolerance of <i>Escherichia coli</i> DH5α to heavy metals, we created a collection of several composite parts designed to combat oxidative stress. These parts mainly convey the ability to dismutate the superoxide anion and its secondary products like hydrogen peroxide into nontoxic forms. We were able to demonstrate that cells carrying our construct BBa_K2638118, containing the superoxide dismutase A and catalase under the control of a strong RBS and the pBAD promoter on pSB1C3, or BBa_K2638112, containing the glutathione synthase, the glutathione peroxidase and the glutathione reductase under the control of a strong RBS and the pBAD promoter on pSB1C3, are not subject to increased growth rate but to a significantly higher viability when the cells are exposed to elevated concentrations of heavy metals, namely CuSO<sub>4</sub>. |
</article> | </article> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <a name="phy" id="phy" class="shifted-anchor"></a> | ||
<h2>Phytochelatin synthase</h2> | <h2>Phytochelatin synthase</h2> | ||
<div class="article"> | <div class="article"> | ||
− | The phytochelatin synthase produces phytochelatin which plays a major role in heavy metal detoxification processes in Arabidopsis | + | The phytochelatin synthase produces phytochelatin which plays a major role in heavy metal detoxification processes in <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i>. The phytochelatin synthase <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2638150">BBa_K2638150 </a>was cloned into pSB1C3 in <i>Escherichia Coli (E. coli)</i> DH5α. For an enzyme assay it was cloned downstream of T7 promoter and upstream of an intein tag and chitin binding domain in <i>E. coli</i> ER2566. After overexpression and purification the protein was analyzed via <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/73/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--SDS_PAGE_LK.pdf">SDS-PAGE</a> and <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a3/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--MALDI_LK.pdf">MALDI-TOF</a>. An enzyme assay ensured the catalytic activity of the <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2638150">BBa_K2638150</a>. |
</br> | </br> | ||
− | The gene for the phytochelatin synthase (PCS1) has been ordered as gene synthesis from IDT. The gene synthesis was designed containing overlapping sequences to the iGEM standard backbone pSB1C3 to incorporate it directly via Gibson Assembly. The resulting BioBrick containing the phytochelatin synthetase is <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2638150">BBa_K2638150</a>. After successful transformation in <i>E.coli</i> | + | The gene for the phytochelatin synthase (PCS1) has been ordered as gene synthesis from IDT. The gene synthesis was designed containing overlapping sequences to the iGEM standard backbone pSB1C3 to incorporate it directly via Gibson Assembly. The resulting BioBrick containing the phytochelatin synthetase is <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2638150">BBa_K2638150</a>. After successful transformation in <i>E. coli</i> DH5α different promoters were used to construct different composite parts. The Anderson promoter of <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J23111">BBa_J23111</a> with the ribosomal binding site (RBS) <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0030">BBa_B0030</a> was cloned upstream of the phytochelatin synthase for <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2638152">BBa_K2638152</a> as well as the pTet promoter <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_R0040">BBa_R0040</a> and the RBS <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_J61101">BBa_J61101</a> for <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B2638151">BBa_K2638151</a>. For inducible expression pBad/araC promoter <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_I0500">BBa_I0500</a> was cloned together with the RBS <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_B0030">BBa_B0030</a> for BioBrick <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2638153">BBa_K2638153</a>. For characterization we wanted to overexpress and purify the phytochelatin synthase. Therefore, <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2638150">BBa_K2638150</a> was cloned downstream of a T7 promoter and fused to an intein tag and chitin binding domain. This construct was transformed into <i>E. coli</i> ER2566 and the phytochelatin synthase was overexpressed by induction of the T7 promoter. After cultivation, purification was carried out with the <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/bd/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--IMPACT-CN_LK.pdf">NEB IMPACT</a> system. Briefly, the phytochelatin synthase was bound to the column with its chitin binding domain. Afterwards, washing the column with cleavage buffer resulted in self-cleavage of the intein leading to a separation of the protein from the column. The protein concentration was determined by <a href="https://www.carlroth.com/downloads/ba/de/K/BA_K880_DE.pdf">Roti-Nanoquant assay</a>,showing a protein concentration of 20.21 mg/mL. To confirm successful expression and purification the protein was loaded onto a <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/73/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--SDS_PAGE_LK.pdf">SDS-PAGE</a> (Figure 1). |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 74: | Line 91: | ||
<img class="figure hundred" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a2/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--SDS_PAGE_PhySyn_MO.jpg"> | <img class="figure hundred" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a2/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--SDS_PAGE_PhySyn_MO.jpg"> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
− | <b>Figure 1:</b> SDS-PAGE of the purified phytochelatin synthase (BBa_K2638150). Phytochelatin synthase was expressed and purified and loaded on a SDS-PAGE in different dilutions. Lanes 1 and 2 show a 1:6 dilution of the sample, lanes 3 and 4 show 1:12 dilutions, lanes 5 and 6 show 1:24 dilutions and lanes 7 and 8 show 1:48 dilutions. The holes show cut bands which were examined by MALDI-TOF. | + | <b>Figure 1:</b> <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/73/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--SDS_PAGE_LK.pdf">SDS-PAGE</a> of the purified phytochelatin synthase (BBa_K2638150). Phytochelatin synthase was expressed and purified and loaded on a <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/73/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--SDS_PAGE_LK.pdf">SDS-PAGE</a> in different dilutions. Lanes 1 and 2 show a 1:6 dilution of the sample, lanes 3 and 4 show 1:12 dilutions, lanes 5 and 6 show 1:24 dilutions and lanes 7 and 8 show 1:48 dilutions. The holes show cut bands which were examined by <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a3/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--MALDI_LK.pdf">MALDI-TOF</a>. Red boxes mark the correct bands for the phytochelatin synthase. |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | The SDS-PAGE shows an intense band at around 50 kDa. This band gets less intense in samples with a higher dilution but is still strongly present in the 1:48 dilution. As the phytochelatin synthase has a molecular weight of 53.946 kDa, this band indicates successful expression and purification of the enzyme. To proof that the band is indeed the phytochelatin | + | The SDS-PAGE shows an intense band at around 50 kDa. This band gets less intense in samples with a higher dilution but is still strongly present in the 1:48 dilution. As the phytochelatin synthase has a molecular weight of 53.946 kDa, this band indicates successful expression and purification of the enzyme. To proof that the band is indeed the phytochelatin synthase, matrix associated laser desorbtion ionization – time of flight analysis (MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry) was performed. Therefore, the bands were cut out as indicated and prepared as described for <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a3/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--MALDI_LK.pdf">MALDI-TOF</a> analysis (Figure 2). |
</article> | </article> | ||
<figure role="group"> | <figure role="group"> | ||
<img class="figure hundred" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/82/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--PhySyn_MALDI_TOF_MO.png"> | <img class="figure hundred" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/82/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--PhySyn_MALDI_TOF_MO.png"> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
− | <b>Figure 2:</b> MALDI-TOF results of the phytochelatin synthase BBa_K2638150. Purified phytochelatin synthase | + | <b>Figure 2:</b> <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a3/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--MALDI_LK.pdf">MALDI-TOF</a> results of the phytochelatin synthase BBa_K2638150. Purified phytochelatin synthase was analyzed by <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/7/73/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--SDS_PAGE_LK.pdf">SDS-PAGE</a> and characteristic bands were cut out and analyzed by <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/a/a3/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--MALDI_LK.pdf">MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry</a>. |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
Line 91: | Line 108: | ||
Figure 2 shows the results of the MALDI-TOF measurements. Comparison with the Mascot database indicates that the examined sample is the phytochelatin synthase <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2638150">BBa_K2638150</a>. | Figure 2 shows the results of the MALDI-TOF measurements. Comparison with the Mascot database indicates that the examined sample is the phytochelatin synthase <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2638150">BBa_K2638150</a>. | ||
− | In order to determine that the BioBrick <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2638150">BBa_K2638150</a> works as expected, an enzyme assay for the phythochelatin synthase (Chen et al.,1997) was conducted. The assay is based on the conversion of glutathione to phytochelatin Therefore, the enzymatic in vitro assay was performed and afterwards the sample was measured with a liquid chromatography which was connected with a mass spectrometer. This was carried out via this <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/67/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--Measurement_of_the_phytochelatin_synthase_assay_LK.pdf">protocol</a>. For the enzyme assay three samples contained 1 mM GSH and another three samples contained 5 mM GSH. The phytochelatin synthase was activated by adding 500 µM CdCl<sub>2</sub>. The last three samples contained 5 mM GSH and were activated by addition of 50 µM CuSO<sub>4</sub>. The blank sample contained no phytochelatin synthase but 500 µM CdCl<sub>2</sub>. | + | In order to determine that the BioBrick <a href="http://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2638150">BBa_K2638150</a> works as expected, an enzyme assay for the phythochelatin synthase (Chen <i>et al.</i>,1997) was conducted. The assay is based on the conversion of glutathione to phytochelatin. Therefore, the enzymatic in vitro assay was performed and afterwards the sample was measured with a liquid chromatography which was connected with a mass spectrometer. This was carried out via this <a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/67/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--Measurement_of_the_phytochelatin_synthase_assay_LK.pdf">protocol</a>. For the enzyme assay three samples contained 1 mM GSH and another three samples contained 5 mM GSH as a substrate. The phytochelatin synthase was activated by adding 500 µM CdCl<sub>2</sub>. The last three samples contained 5 mM GSH and were activated by addition of 50 µM CuSO<sub>4</sub>. The blank sample contained no phytochelatin synthase but 500 µM CdCl<sub>2</sub>. |
Line 100: | Line 117: | ||
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/bc/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--ChroPhySyn_MO.png"> | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/b/bc/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--ChroPhySyn_MO.png"> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
− | <b>Figure 3:</b> Chromatogram of mass spectrometry connected with a liquid chromatography of glutathione and the different phytochelatins. | + | <b>Figure 3:</b> Chromatogram of mass spectrometry connected with a liquid chromatography of glutathione and the different phytochelatins. The in vitro activity assay for the phytochelatin synthase was carried out as described and the reaction mixture was separated by liquid chromatography and analyzed by mass spectrometry. |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
Line 106: | Line 123: | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | In figure 3 the different m/z ratio of the substrate glutathione and the different phytochelatins (PC) can be seen. The difference of the m/z ratio between glutathione and | + | In figure 3 the different m/z ratio of the substrate glutathione and the different phytochelatins (PC) can be seen. The difference of the m/z ratio between glutathione and PC<sub>2</sub> is about 232. The difference is the same between PC<sub>2</sub>, PC<sub>3</sub>, PC<sub>4</sub> and PC<sub>5</sub>. This indicates product formation by subsequent transfer of a γ-Glu-Cys moiety onto glutathione or smaller chain phytochelatins leading to phytochelatins with a chain length of up to n = 5. This results show that the phytochelatin synthase is catalytically active. |
+ | |||
</article> | </article> | ||
Line 113: | Line 131: | ||
<img class="figure hundred" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/f9/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--ChroLCPhySyn_MO.png"> | <img class="figure hundred" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/f/f9/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--ChroLCPhySyn_MO.png"> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
− | <b>Figure 4:</b> Chromatogram of liquid chromatography of glutathione and the different phytochelatins. | + | <b>Figure 4:</b> Chromatogram of liquid chromatography of glutathione and the different phytochelatins of the phytochelatin assay. |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
Line 119: | Line 137: | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | + | Figure 4 shows the retention time of the substrate glutathione and the different phytochelatins. The chromatogram is from the assay sample with 1 mM glutathione. The highest peak is number 4 which is glutathione. This reveals that the substrate was still available in high amounts and not the whole amount of glutathione was converted to phytochelatins. Number 3 shows the second highest peak which is PC<sub>2</sub> with a peak area of 479843. The peak area of peak number 1 is with 197103 more than half as high as peak number 3. The lowest peak area reveals peak number 2 with a peak area of 50905. It becomes obvious that the amount of phytochelatins decreases as the number of γ-Glu-Cys moieties in the phytochelatins increases. The whole overview of the samples can be seen in table 1. This table also shows that the three samples which were activated by CuSO<sub>4</sub> contained PC<sub>2</sub>, PC<sub>3</sub> and PC<sub>4</sub>. This suggests that the phytochelatin synthase can not only be activated by CdCl<sub>2</sub> but also by CuSO<sub>4</sub>. In comparison with the Cadmium activated samples it becomes obvious that the peak area of the CuSO<sub>4</sub> treated samples is lower. | |
</article> | </article> | ||
Line 125: | Line 143: | ||
<figure role="group"> | <figure role="group"> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
− | <b>Table 1:</b> | + | <b>Table 1:</b> Peak area as measured by liquid chromatography for glutathione or different phytochelatins for the reaction mixtures from the phytochelatin assay. The phytochelatin assay was conducted with different starting amounts of glutathione and the phytochelatin synthase was activated by either 50 µM CuSO<sub>4</sub> (line 8-10) or 500 µM CdCl<sub>2</sub> (all other lines). The peak area shows abundance of the specific phytochelatins. |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
<img class="figure hundred" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/85/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--TableLC_MO.png"> | <img class="figure hundred" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/85/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--TableLC_MO.png"> | ||
Line 132: | Line 150: | ||
− | + | <a name="grow" id="grow" class="shifted-anchor"></a> | |
<h2>Growth experiments</h2> | <h2>Growth experiments</h2> | ||
Line 147: | Line 165: | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | As a first step, we investigated the influence of mining drainage on <i>Escherichia coli</i>. Therefore we performed a cultivation in LB media and mining drainage. The experiments showed no growth in the mining drainage, but a reduction of biomass due to the toxicity of the solution. | + | As a first step, we investigated the influence of mining drainage on <i>Escherichia coli</i> (see figure 5). Therefore we performed a cultivation in LB media and mining drainage. The experiments showed no growth in the mining drainage, but a reduction of biomass due to the toxicity of the solution. |
</article> | </article> | ||
<figure role="group"> | <figure role="group"> | ||
Line 169: | Line 187: | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | This experiment was conducted in order to examine the influence of the constructs on the growth behavior of <i>E. coli</i> in general. The growth of strains carrying the constructs mentioned in figure | + | This experiment was conducted in order to examine the influence of the constructs on the growth behavior of <i>E. coli</i> in general. The growth of strains carrying the constructs mentioned in figure 7 in absence of cupric salt was examined. No significant difference between the highest OD<sub>600</sub> values of the cells could be observed. However, cells carrying plasmids under the control of the pBAD promoter (BBa_K2638112) showed a different growth pattern since they can rely on another carbon source other than those regularly appearing in LB medium. This leads to two consecutive exponential phases resulting in similar OD<sub>600</sub> values compared to those only relying solely on the carbon sources of LB medium. Other than that, no significant changes in growth behaviour were observed. |
</article> | </article> | ||
Line 180: | Line 198: | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | This experiment was conducted to evaluate the general effect of the applied constructs on growth in presence of CuSO<sub>4</sub>. No mutant carrying any of the BioBricks shown in figure | + | This experiment was conducted to evaluate the general effect of the applied constructs on growth in presence of CuSO<sub>4</sub>. No mutant carrying any of the BioBricks shown in figure 8 exhibits an advantage regarding the growth rate or the final OD<sub>600</sub> value compared to the strain carrying the empty plasmid. While BBa_K2638110 and BBa_K2638114 exhibit the same growth pattern as the strain carrying an empty pSB1C3 vector implying that these BioBricks do not exhibit any effect on the resistance against elevated concentrations of copper ions. BBa_K2638112 and BBa_K2638109 however showed significant lower growth rates and did not reach an OD<sub>600</sub> value as high as the other strains. Therefore, they appear to posses a negative effect on the resistance against copper ions. The construct BBa_K2638118 does not differ significantly from the strain with the empty vector and does not reach an OD<sub>600</sub> value as high. A negative effect on the copper resistance can therefore not be excluded. |
</article> | </article> | ||
Line 191: | Line 209: | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | To evaluate the effect of the constructs in concentrations of CuSO<sub>4</sub> lethal to <i>E. coli</i>, we observed the growth of the strains mentioned in figure | + | To evaluate the effect of the constructs in concentrations of CuSO<sub>4</sub> lethal to <i>E. coli</i>, we observed the growth of the strains mentioned in figure 9 in LB medium containing 8 mM CuSO<sub>4</sub>. The results can be viewed in figure 9. Every strain showed visible growth only during the first two hours at best. Afterwards, there was no significant increase in the OD<sub>600</sub> value. The highest OD<sub>600</sub> values were achieved by the construct BBa_K2638112, carrying the genes <i>gor</i>, <i>btuE</i> and <i>gshB</i>, the lowest OD<sub>600</sub> values by the construct BBa_K2638109, carrying the gene <i>crs5</i>.</br> |
</article> | </article> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <a name="via" id="via" class="shifted-anchor"></a> | ||
<h2>Viability</h2> | <h2>Viability</h2> | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
Line 211: | Line 231: | ||
− | < | + | <figure role="group"> |
− | + | <figcaption> | |
− | + | <b>Table 2:</b> R and R<sup>2</sup> values. | |
− | + | </figcaption> | |
− | + | <img class="figure hundred" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/8/82/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--jr--table1.png"> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | </figure> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | The same measurements were performed for cells at CuSO<sub>4</sub> concentrations of 4 mM and 8 mM. The linear fits for the constructs grown in both media are shown in figures | + | The same measurements were performed for cells at CuSO<sub>4</sub> concentrations of 4 mM and 8 mM. The linear fits for the constructs grown in both media are shown in figures 10 and 11. |
</article> | </article> | ||
Line 252: | Line 252: | ||
A positive correlation was indicated by determining the Pearson correlation coefficient <i>R</i> and the coefficient for determination for the different <i>R<sup>2</sup></i> constructs. However, according to its coefficient of determination, in the case of BBa_K2638110 only 83.7 % of all changes of the optical density could be referred to the changes in the amount of colony forming units,. according to its coefficient of determination. In general, a positive correlation between the optical density and the CFU could be clearly determined. | A positive correlation was indicated by determining the Pearson correlation coefficient <i>R</i> and the coefficient for determination for the different <i>R<sup>2</sup></i> constructs. However, according to its coefficient of determination, in the case of BBa_K2638110 only 83.7 % of all changes of the optical density could be referred to the changes in the amount of colony forming units,. according to its coefficient of determination. In general, a positive correlation between the optical density and the CFU could be clearly determined. | ||
</article> | </article> | ||
− | < | + | <figure role="group"> |
− | + | <figcaption> | |
− | + | <b>Table 3:</b> R and R<sup>2</sup> values. | |
− | + | </figcaption> | |
− | + | <img class="figure hundred" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/5/5f/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--jr--table2.png"> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | </figure> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
− | In contrast to those cells grown in the absence of CuSO<sub>4</sub> and in the presence of 4 mM CuSO<sub>4</sub>, no positive correlation between the optical density and the CFU could be observed. Instead, the cells grown in LB medium with 8 mM CuSO<sub>4</sub> were proven to show a negative correlation, clearly demonstrating the lethal effect on cells. This is clearly visible in figure | + | In contrast to those cells grown in the absence of CuSO<sub>4</sub> and in the presence of 4 mM CuSO<sub>4</sub>, no positive correlation between the optical density and the CFU could be observed. Instead, the cells grown in LB medium with 8 mM CuSO<sub>4</sub> were proven to show a negative correlation, clearly demonstrating the lethal effect on cells. This is clearly visible in figure 12 (see below). |
</article> | </article> | ||
Line 293: | Line 273: | ||
The negative correlation was revealed by Pearson correlation coefficient <i>R</i> and coefficient of determination R<sup>2</sup>. | The negative correlation was revealed by Pearson correlation coefficient <i>R</i> and coefficient of determination R<sup>2</sup>. | ||
</article> | </article> | ||
− | < | + | <figure role="group"> |
− | + | <figcaption> | |
− | + | <b>Table 4:</b> R and R<sup>2</sup> values. | |
− | + | </figcaption> | |
− | + | <img class="figure hundred" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/0/0f/T--Bielefeld-CeBiTec--jr--table3.png"> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | </figure> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
<article> | <article> | ||
R<sup>2</sup> was less than half as big as the R<sup>2</sup> values of the other constructs and of all constructs at different concentrations of CuSO<sub>4</sub>. The negative correlation was likely due to cells dying at higher copper concentrations but not being degraded immediately so that the OD<sub>600</sub> value suggests a higher cell density than viability. Therefore, the correlation of every construct shifts to the negative area. Furthermore, the highest R and R<sup>2</sup> values have been determined for the mutant carrying the empty pSB1C3 vector. | R<sup>2</sup> was less than half as big as the R<sup>2</sup> values of the other constructs and of all constructs at different concentrations of CuSO<sub>4</sub>. The negative correlation was likely due to cells dying at higher copper concentrations but not being degraded immediately so that the OD<sub>600</sub> value suggests a higher cell density than viability. Therefore, the correlation of every construct shifts to the negative area. Furthermore, the highest R and R<sup>2</sup> values have been determined for the mutant carrying the empty pSB1C3 vector. |
Latest revision as of 18:06, 7 December 2018
Toxicity Results
Short Summary
Phytochelatin synthase
The phytochelatin synthase produces phytochelatin which plays a major role in heavy metal detoxification processes in Arabidopsis thaliana. The phytochelatin synthase BBa_K2638150 was cloned into pSB1C3 in Escherichia Coli (E. coli) DH5α. For an enzyme assay it was cloned downstream of T7 promoter and upstream of an intein tag and chitin binding domain in E. coli ER2566. After overexpression and purification the protein was analyzed via SDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF. An enzyme assay ensured the catalytic activity of the BBa_K2638150.
The gene for the phytochelatin synthase (PCS1) has been ordered as gene synthesis from IDT. The gene synthesis was designed containing overlapping sequences to the iGEM standard backbone pSB1C3 to incorporate it directly via Gibson Assembly. The resulting BioBrick containing the phytochelatin synthetase is BBa_K2638150. After successful transformation in E. coli DH5α different promoters were used to construct different composite parts. The Anderson promoter of BBa_J23111 with the ribosomal binding site (RBS) BBa_B0030 was cloned upstream of the phytochelatin synthase for BBa_K2638152 as well as the pTet promoter BBa_R0040 and the RBS BBa_J61101 for BBa_K2638151. For inducible expression pBad/araC promoter BBa_I0500 was cloned together with the RBS BBa_B0030 for BioBrick BBa_K2638153. For characterization we wanted to overexpress and purify the phytochelatin synthase. Therefore, BBa_K2638150 was cloned downstream of a T7 promoter and fused to an intein tag and chitin binding domain. This construct was transformed into E. coli ER2566 and the phytochelatin synthase was overexpressed by induction of the T7 promoter. After cultivation, purification was carried out with the NEB IMPACT system. Briefly, the phytochelatin synthase was bound to the column with its chitin binding domain. Afterwards, washing the column with cleavage buffer resulted in self-cleavage of the intein leading to a separation of the protein from the column. The protein concentration was determined by Roti-Nanoquant assay,showing a protein concentration of 20.21 mg/mL. To confirm successful expression and purification the protein was loaded onto a SDS-PAGE (Figure 1).
Growth experiments
Heavy metal exposure poses many risks and dangers to living organisms and the environment. Certain heavy metal ions such as copper can interact with enzymes and lower their activity as well as their specificity. Furthermore, heavy metals promoted reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation from processes such as Fenton chemistry and Haber-Weiss reactions. In our modeling regarding the accumulation of copper ions by the importer OprC, we came to the conclusion that the cells would have to incubate too long in the mining drainage, ultimately leading to cell death in a short period of time. Therefore, a sophisticated approach to increase the tolerance against heavy metals is desired which is necessary for cases where biological systems are deployed in heavy metal rich environments. Since we worked in our project with the heavy metals copper, silver, gold and iron, we evaluated several approaches of applying anti-oxidants against the generation of ROS.
We decided to set a focus on the accumulation of copper ions due to its low costs and easy solubility. Additionally, its toxicity is lower than that of silver and gold. Hence there is a broader spectrum in which anti-toxic measures against the generation of ROS can be explored. Therefore, we tested our approaches on anti-oxidant measures in different concentrations of cupric salts.
Subject to our research were the five following composite parts: BBa_K2638109 (pSB1C3+pTet+CRS5), BBa_K2638112 (pSB1C3+pBAD+gshB+gor+btuE), BBa_K2638114 (pSB1C3+pTet+soxR+oxyR), BBa_K2638110 (pSB1C3+gshB+pcs1) and BBa_K2638118 (pSB1C3+sodA+katG).