Difference between revisions of "Team:Toronto/Public Engagement"

Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Template:Toronto/CSS}}
 
{{Template:Toronto/CSS}}
 +
 
<html>
 
<html>
 +
<style>
 +
p.border {border-style: solid; border-color: red; padding: 20px;}
 +
</style>
  
−
 
+
<body>
−
 
+
  <div style="margin-top: -7px;">
−
<div class="center" style="height: 400px; width: 80%;">
+
    <div class="backgroundTertiaryHandler">
−
<div class="centerPacker">
+
      <div id="scroller-anchor"></div>
−
  <p style="font-size: 20px; line-height:20px; text-align: center;">"Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
+
      <nav class="navigation" id="mainNav" style="border-style: solid;">
−
    Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor
+
        <a class="navigation__link" href="#1">Top</a>
−
    in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident,
+
        <a class="navigation__link" href="#2">Introduction</a>
−
    sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum."</p>
+
        <a class="navigation__link" href="#3">Podcast</a>
−
</div>
+
        <a class="navigation__link" href="#4">Literature Review</a>
−
</div>
+
      </nav>
−
 
+
     
−
 
+
      <div class="page-section hero" id="1">
 +
        <h3>Education and Public Engagement</h3>
 +
      </div>
 +
      <div class="page-section" id="2">
 +
        <h1>Intoduction</h1>
 +
        <p STYLE="margin-bottom: 0in; color: black">
 +
          Our work in education and public engagement is aimed at intertwining society and our project, iGEM, and synthetic biology. These education and public engagement elements differ from those of outreach because they integrate the perceptions and concerns of society into our project which produces a relevant and responsible design. After meeting with our stakeholders, Kinross and the WWTP, we learned there was improvement needed in the education of our team, our project, iGEM, and synthetic biology. We developed internal and external programs, both aimed at informing iGEM members and society as well as encourage public and stakeholder interaction incorporation in future iGEM projects. </br></br></br>
 +
         
 +
          University research faculties are the primary vehicles for the execution of publicly sponsored research and have great influence on the nation’s science policies, the scientific agenda, the broad nature of the public’s research priorities and the public's understanding of how new knowledge will be deployed. The understanding of computational procedures, laboratory experiments, and ethics and public policy have a significant influence on the very character of the scientific enterprise. We produced innovative educational tools and public engagement activities, such as workshops, a SynBio Forum, and a public survey, to spark new scientific curiosity and establish a public dialogue about synthetic biology from the opinions of those outside the lab.
 +
        </p>
 +
      </div>
 +
      <div class="page-section hero" id="3">
 +
        <h2>WORKSHOPS:</h2>
 +
      </div>
 +
      <div class="page-section" id="4">
 +
        <h1>BIOETHICS WORKSHOP</h1>
 +
        <p>
 +
          We understand the importance of teaching our iGEM members that with the rise of synthetic biology research and
 +
          development, bioethics becomes more prominent. Bioethics examines and determines basic human values as well as
 +
          the morality of developments in healthcare, life technology, medicine, and society’s responsibility for the
 +
          health of its citizens. </br></br></br>
 +
         
 +
          The bioethics workshop provoked conversation and allowed participants to analyze the consequences of synthetic
 +
          biology research, a core characteristic of policy and practices. This workshop encouraged participants to
 +
          investigate the importance of integrating science and bioethics. Producing an adequate understanding of this
 +
          integration will result in ethical scientific development and scholarly researchers. After this workshop,  
 +
          participants were able to critically analyze the development of science and biotechnology and its ramifications. </br></br></br>
 +
         
 +
          This workshop is important for iGEM members and students of all backgrounds and learning stages because it
 +
          will provide the necessary means to formulate ethical, social and political assertions that positively progress
 +
          synthetic biology rather than interfere with its growth. </br></br></br>
 +
         
 +
          Each class included an interactive activity, in the form of an informal debate, to engage participants to
 +
          understand and evaluate the nature of the disagreements. Participants will be given a problem or scenario that
 +
          requires them to formulate questions, analyze evidence, connect evidence to pre-existing theories, derive
 +
          conclusions, consider all perspectives and reflect on their learning.</br></br></br>
 +
        </p>
 +
      </div>
 +
     
 +
      <!-- </div> -->
 +
    </div>
 +
  </div>
 +
</body>
 
</html>
 
</html>

Revision as of 00:31, 17 October 2018

Education and Public Engagement

Intoduction

Our work in education and public engagement is aimed at intertwining society and our project, iGEM, and synthetic biology. These education and public engagement elements differ from those of outreach because they integrate the perceptions and concerns of society into our project which produces a relevant and responsible design. After meeting with our stakeholders, Kinross and the WWTP, we learned there was improvement needed in the education of our team, our project, iGEM, and synthetic biology. We developed internal and external programs, both aimed at informing iGEM members and society as well as encourage public and stakeholder interaction incorporation in future iGEM projects.


University research faculties are the primary vehicles for the execution of publicly sponsored research and have great influence on the nation’s science policies, the scientific agenda, the broad nature of the public’s research priorities and the public's understanding of how new knowledge will be deployed. The understanding of computational procedures, laboratory experiments, and ethics and public policy have a significant influence on the very character of the scientific enterprise. We produced innovative educational tools and public engagement activities, such as workshops, a SynBio Forum, and a public survey, to spark new scientific curiosity and establish a public dialogue about synthetic biology from the opinions of those outside the lab.

WORKSHOPS:

BIOETHICS WORKSHOP

We understand the importance of teaching our iGEM members that with the rise of synthetic biology research and development, bioethics becomes more prominent. Bioethics examines and determines basic human values as well as the morality of developments in healthcare, life technology, medicine, and society’s responsibility for the health of its citizens.


The bioethics workshop provoked conversation and allowed participants to analyze the consequences of synthetic biology research, a core characteristic of policy and practices. This workshop encouraged participants to investigate the importance of integrating science and bioethics. Producing an adequate understanding of this integration will result in ethical scientific development and scholarly researchers. After this workshop, participants were able to critically analyze the development of science and biotechnology and its ramifications.


This workshop is important for iGEM members and students of all backgrounds and learning stages because it will provide the necessary means to formulate ethical, social and political assertions that positively progress synthetic biology rather than interfere with its growth.


Each class included an interactive activity, in the form of an informal debate, to engage participants to understand and evaluate the nature of the disagreements. Participants will be given a problem or scenario that requires them to formulate questions, analyze evidence, connect evidence to pre-existing theories, derive conclusions, consider all perspectives and reflect on their learning.