Difference between revisions of "Team:Hong Kong HKUST/Human Practices"

Environmental pollution of plastics has long been an issue of concern across the globe. Statistics have shown that 8.3 billion metric tons of plastic has been produced since its introduction in the 1950s with most of them still exists in some shape or form up until now. Triggered by the disturbing facts of plastic accumulation, the HKUST hope to solve this issue by degrading some of the most common plastics used and turning these degraded plastic into something useful for everyone.

Of all plastics, Polyethylene (PE), is relatively harder to degrade as it is essentially a long hydrocarbon chain. There are virtually no chemical groups for enzymes to recognize and therefore no specific enzymes to digest it. It has also proven very resistant to chemical attacks. As such, polyethylene is a difficult pollutant to tackle. Major products made from PE include plastic bags and they currently take up the largest percentage of marine debris. This has caused major damage to aquatic life. In fact, in Hong Kong, the government has imposed an environmental levy scheme on plastic bags in order to minimize the impact of PE plastic bags on our environment. But still, plastic bags remain in widespread use, with those disposed of winding up in landfills, waiting for millenia to be decomposed. This shows how abundant PE plastic is throughout the world and especially in HK. It has caused so much pollution yet there lie hardly any viable solutions to combat it. The iGEM team of HKUST 2018 aims to tackle the challenge with our genetic constructs.

Our team however realized that by simply degrading the polyethylene, it would still lie around in the environment as fragmented alkanes. Being in the environmental track, we therefore searched for some other environmental issues that our end product can possibly solve. We realize that energy security is another pressing issue countries face.

To solve these two problems simultaneously, we will turn the degraded plastics into an energy source for an electricity-producing strain of bacteria, Shewanella. Plastic degradation and electricity generation will be merged together in a Microbial Fuel Cell as described in our MFC design.

As a team in the environmental track, we decided to consult Professor Davis Bookhart, the head of the HKUST Environment and Sustainability Department who is currently working on different projects to reduce or eliminate the University’s environmental impacts, while addressing and managing risks that arise from climate change and resource scarcities. We thought that he would be able to give us comments on how our project would impact the environment and how we could ensure the sustainability of the production system.

We first presented our system to Professor Bookhart in July. A few concerns he had was that, from the perspective of sustainability, our project was actually converting PE, a carbon-containing pollutant, into CO2 through the respiration of Shewanella, which in itself ıs a greenhouse gas. This actually exacerbates the problem of global warming despite removing a terrestrial and marine pollutant. Instead, Prof. Bookhart suggested that we find a way to reuse the carbon in any way or to feed back into the system for more electricity generation.We can also sequester the CO2 in a way that the CO2 is converted to a solid or a liquid to be stored.

Prof. Bookhart had also asked about the threshold of electricity we expected to generate and how that electricity could be used. To really transform our project into an impactful product, we should implement an application for the electricity generated. We should as well focus on designing a device that could encourage the public to put their plastic waste to good use by generating electricity for daily use.

During our meetups with other iGEM teams for collaboration, we have been exchanging ideas with the team HKJS_S and we realised that their project mechanism can be implemented into our system to tackle the concern of CO2 sustainability raised up by Prof. Bookhart.

One of their parts encodes a nitrogenase that could have the ability to transform CO₂ into methane. Both substrates were actually intimately linked with our project: the CO₂ was the sustainability problem we had to tackle, while methane was a substrate that could be processed by our ASS cluster. Seeing this connection, we asked for their permission to borrow their construct design to improve our system overall.

Originally, we meant to use E coli bacteria to secrete laccase and Shewanella, stored in the MFC, to house the alkane channel and alkane metabolism pathway. But to integrate the comments from Professor Bookhart and our discussion with the HKJS_S team, we decided to incorporate our entire system into one single Bacterial Artificial Chromosome, so that our individual systems could be housed in one single cell to increase the automation of our project. The new schematic is as follows.

As usual, the laccase degrades PE into alkanes (please see our laccase page for details). The AlkL gene (coding for Alkane outer membrane channel protein) allows larger alkanes to enter the transformed Shewanella and the ASS cluster allows the cell to process it (please see our AlkL page for details). In addition, we added a nitrogenase gene to convert CO2 into methane. The idea is that since methane can also be processed by the ASS cluster, CO2 produced by Shewanella during respiration can be recycled into the MFC system.

Since laccase takes about 80 days to degrade about 40% of the sample PE, we will also consider integrating a time delay module into the alkane metabolism module, inspired by the iGEM team of HKUST 2017. The idea is that the alkane channel and alkane processing proteins will only kick into effect after 80 days of PE breakdown, so as to save cellular resources. The time delay module will be enabled by phlF inducer, which induces the pHLFp promoter in front of the alkane metabolism genes. Since the genes have a lower RBS strength than that used by the phlF inducer gene, this will create a time delay when producing the alkane metabolism proteins.

One of the aims of our public engagement and education exhibition was to find out the major concerns of the general public in choosing sources of renewable energy. This will help us to choose the focus and design our MFC to better suit the public’s concerns and aid in a more user friendly design. The detailed analysis of our collected data can be found here

The results shows that “impacts on human health” and “constraints in energy production” are the public’s major concerns. Although there are concerns with environmental pollution, renewable energies in nature is doing more goods than harm to the environment as compared to energies from fossil fuels and therefore put less weighing in listing environmental pollution as their concerns. In order to involve these results in our MFC design, we have came up with the following requirements for our MFC:

• - Enhance product safety and limit the impacts on human health by limiting users’ interaction with the inner mechanism of our Laccase degradation and MFC system. Chemicals and cell culturing medium should not be harmful to both the environment and humans.
• - Focus on reusing or fixing the CO2 that will be released from the respiration of our cell culture.
• - Scale of MFC should be designed to accommodate the slow PE plastic degradation rate.

After the system modification using the nitrogenase system as mentioned earlier, we have gone back to Prof. Bookhart to update him with our progress and to show him the data we have collected. We have asked for further advice on the direction we can go with the comments from the public. Still, Prof. Bookhart’s comment were on the CO₂ being our end product. The nitrogenase system added in this case will only delay the problem of CO₂ release by recycling it, instead of trapping the CO₂ permanently.

Integrating all the concerns and suggestions given by Prof. Bookhart and our market research during our exhibition, we came up with the biosphere-MFC conjugation and the nitrogenase system to fully sequester CO₂.

For the former, we would let CO₂ pass from the anode chamber that houses Shewanella into an adjoining compartment via a semipermeable membrane. The adjoining compartment would house a self-contained biosphere, where plants, shrimp and potentially fish could be stored. The plants inside, with the help of a lamp, could uptake the CO₂ that crosses over via photosynthesis (the MFC can power a small lamp as a light source), hence fixing the CO₂ into a plant, and therefore sequestering the CO₂. This will help decompose PE without releasing additional CO₂ to solves the sustainability issue raised by Professor Bookhart. The nitrogenase system, since it does not trap the CO₂ permanently, it was not suggested to be the main way to solve the sustainability issue. Our team decided to keep this system however, to enhance our electricity generation when the plastic degradation process is limited.

Alongside carbon sequestration, there is an added benefit of using the plants near the MFC to absorb any excess Cu ions that helps laccase enzymatic activity. This will aid the biosphere and also prevent Cu contamination to the environment.

Hence, our modified product design will now be an MFC/biosphere conjugation. It is hoped that the mini-ecosystem can be a visual prop to educate people on the idea of sustainability and also motivate them to be more environmentally friendly as the biosphere may serve as a tangible reward for them. In addition to educating the public and raising awareness towards the environment, the MFC/biosphere conjugation can still generate enough electricity to charge a power pack, through the help of a capacitor. On a small scale, it can be used in households to charge batteries or power packs for electrical devices. On a large scale, the MFC/biosphere conjugation can be used in malls to serve as a charging station as well as a mini aquarium to be shown.