Difference between revisions of "Team:SHSBNU China/Improve"

Line 151: Line 151:
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
<p class="text">
 
<p class="text">
The decrease of florescence of the supernatant indicates how much sfGFP-SpyCatcher protein the biofilm gain.
+
We tested our improved part BBa_K2684006 and the previous part BBa_K1583000 with the same protein expression system settings (E. coli BL21, pET28a vector, and the same induction and expression protocol).</p>
</p>
+
 
<div style="width: 46vw" class="content_pic_left">
 
<div style="width: 46vw" class="content_pic_left">
 
<img class="pictures" id = "Improve_2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/90/T--SHSBNU_China--Improve_2.png"/>
 
<img class="pictures" id = "Improve_2" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/9/90/T--SHSBNU_China--Improve_2.png"/>
Line 158: Line 157:
 
</div>
 
</div>
 
<p class="text">
 
<p class="text">
There’s a significant difference between the two groups. Thus, our CgsA-SpyTag successfully fixed sfGFP-CatCher proetin.
+
The decrease of florescence of the supernatant indicates the immobilization of sfGFP-SpyCatcher, and there’s a significant difference between the two groups.</p>
</p>
+
 
</div>
 
</div>
  

Revision as of 03:44, 18 October 2018

Improvements

Improve

I. Overview

Fig1.1: CsgA-SpyTag

CsgA is a amyloid protein which is a dominant component of the biofilms of E. coli. We fused a functional peptide domain SpyTag with gene CsgA (previous part: BBa_K1583000), forming CsgA-SpyTag (Improved Part: BBa_K2684006). By utilizing the steady isopeptide bond combination ability of the SpyTag-SpyCatcher system , it is possible to fix different SpyChatcher-fusing proteins, like enzymes or receptors, to the biofilm to introduce a variety of artificial functions.

(Team: Peking, 2016)

Fig1.2: SpyTag and SpyCatcher System

II. Verification - Using sfGFP-SpyCatcher

We used sfGFP-SpyCatcher as indicator to test whether the addition of SpyTag peptide could confer the artificial functions to the biofilm, such as covalent immobilization of SpyCatcher-fusion proteins.

Protocol for SpyTag-SpyCatcher system verification

We tested our improved part BBa_K2684006 and the previous part BBa_K1583000 with the same protein expression system settings (E. coli BL21, pET28a vector, and the same induction and expression protocol).

The decrease of florescence of the supernatant indicates the immobilization of sfGFP-SpyCatcher, and there’s a significant difference between the two groups.

III. Verification - Using SpyCatcher-CotA

We used SpyCatcher-CotA Protein, laccase with SpyCatcher, to fix on to our CsgA-SpyTag biofilm. We used ABTS as indicator to measure the laccase activity of the biofilm after the fixing process as a whole. If our CsgA-SpyTag biofilm has laccase activity, that means the fixing process of SpyCatcher and SpyTag is successful.

Protocol for Biofilm x Laccase

There were significance of difference was indicated as **** which was pretty high. So we proved that SpyCatcher-CotA is successfully combined to the biofilm.



IV. Conclusion

In our experiments, we give CsgA a new ability, which is capturing all fusion protein with SpyCatcher, by adding SpyTag domain after CsgA. We test SpyTag using sfGFP-SpyCatcher and SpyCatcher-CotA. We also proved that fusion protein is still functional after fixed to the biofilm.

Reference:

“Uranium Reaper.” Uranium Reaper - Team: Peking, 2016.igem.org/Team:Peking.