Chuanyang Liu, Changsong Gao, Chushu Zhu and Qijie Xu completed most of the experiments.

Methods and Design

1. InterLab Parts

Positive Control (BBa_I20270)

NegativeControl (BBa_R0040)

Test Device1 (BBa_J364000)

Test Device2 (BBa_J364001)

Test Device3 (BBa_J364002)

Test Device4 (BBa_J364007)

Test Device5 (BBa_J364008)

Test Device6 (BBa_J364009)

2. Preparation

To start with, our team transformed E.coli strain DH5α with the provided plasmids, namely Test Device 1,2,3,4,5,6, Positive Control, and Negative Control. As long as colonies had emerged on Cm⁺ Resistance Media, we picked up 2 colonies in each petrie dish and cultured them at 37℃ with 220 rpm frequency for 14 hours. When the bacteria solutions were turbid enough, we began the following process.

3. OD600 Reference Point

With plate reader, we measured Abs600 of the LUDOX and H2O. The H2O measurement served as the background. Both included 4 technical replicates to enhance the reliability of the results. Comparing to the standard OD600 reference given, which was 0.0425, we were able to achieve a ratio between OD600 and Abs600. The ratio was essential in converting Abs600 raw measurements into standard OD600 records.

4. Fluorescein Standard Curve

Different concentrations of fluorescein were obtained by 2-fold serial dilution. In the first pipet, 200μL Fluorescein 1×stock solution was added. By removing half of the 200μL solution in previous pipets to later ones which already contained 100μL PBS, we were able to generate 11 solutions in half-descending fluorescence concentration. We also included another pipet with 100μL PBS only as blank. Within each concentration, we performed 4 replicates to calculate the more representative mean. After the results were recorded, all fluorescein concentrations were divided by average fluorescence measurement, of which the medium-high mean were calculated to diminish operation errors. This mean point would be used to set up the conversion between fluorescein concentration and fluorescence measurements in later steps.

5. OD600 and Fluorescence Measurements

We tracked the original OD600 of the 16 samples so as to dilute them into 0.02. Once the original values were available, we integrated them into the dilution calculation sheet and followed the suggested volume to dilute each sample. After dilution, we confirmed that OD600 had reached exactly 0.02 or around. Our team set that time as T=0(h) and measured average OD600 from 4 replicates of each 16 samples to reduce technical error. Other 4 replicates were used for T=0(h) fluorescence measurements, with the same equipment and settings in Step 3. Henceforward, we recorded the OD600 and fluorescence when T=0 and T=6.

6. Equipments and Settings

To obtain OD600 measurement, we employed Multiscan FC. Single wavelength of 600nm was used, and path length correction was turned off. To reduce measurement error, we also added a dynamic circulation of 5 times, with 2-second intervals.

The fluorescence measurement was obtained through Fluoroskan Ascent FL and Thermo Fisher. The filters used were 485nm and 538nm for excitation and emission respectively. The measurement cycled 5 times with intervals of 2 second.

Results & Discussion

Calibration

Calibration1: OD600 Reference point – LUDOX Protocol

We used LUDOX CL-X (45% colloidal silica suspension) , ddH2O and 96 well plate(black with clear flat bottom preferred) to get the conversion factor, which can transform Abs600 measurements into comparable OD600 measurements.

Fig.1 OD600 reference point

	LUDOX CL-X	H2O
Replicate 1	0.062	0.039
Replicate 2	0.060	0.039
Replicate 3	0.066	0.038
Replicate 4	0.061	0.038
Arith. Mean	0.062	0.039
Corrected Abs600	0.024
Reference OD600	0.063
OD600/Abs600	2.654

Calibration2: Particle Standard Curve – Microsphere Protocol

Following the protocol, we prepared a dilution series of monodisperse silica microspheres and measure the Abs600 in our plate reader. We got a particle standard curve and transferred it into log scale, which are shown as below.

Calibration3: Fluorescence standard curve – Fluorescein Protocol

We did a dilution series of fluorescein in four replicates. After recording the measurements, we generated a standard curve of fluorescence for fluorescein concentration and its log scale version, which are shown as below.

Cell measurement

2.1 Abs600

We have read two plates at the time point: 0 and 6 hours with the same conditions in our calibration measurements.

We measured both fluorescence and absorbance of 2 biological replicates and 4 technical replicates. Abs600 values for device 5 are almost the lowest while the values of device 3 are almost the highest.

Abs600 Raw Readings:

		Hour 0	Hour 6
Neg. Control	Replicate 1	0.068	0.297
	Replicate 2	0.069	0.285
	Replicate 3	0.068	0.291
	Replicate 4	0.072	0.286
Pos. Control	Replicate 1	0.072	0.296
	Replicate 2	0.071	0.288
	Replicate 3	0.075	0.284
	Replicate 4	0.068	0.285
Device1	Replicate 1	0.068	0.239
	Replicate 2	0.067	0.22
	Replicate 3	0.073	0.223
	Replicate 4	0.069	0.224
Device2	Replicate 1	0.066	0.268
	Replicate 2	0.071	0.27
	Replicate 3	0.068	0.268
	Replicate 4	0.066	0.273
Device3	Replicate 1	0.069	0.425
	Replicate 2	0.067	0.358
	Replicate 3	0.072	0.343
	Replicate 4	0.074	0.347
Device4	Replicate 1	0.067	0.21
	Replicate 2	0.067	0.217
	Replicate 3	0.067	0.217
	Replicate 4	0.07	0.221
Device5	Replicate 1	0.066	0.161
	Replicate 2	0.067	0.155
	Replicate 3	0.069	0.16
	Replicate 4	0.066	0.164
Device6	Replicate 1	0.067	0.294
	Replicate 2	0.068	0.284
	Replicate 3	0.067	0.286
	Replicate 4	0.071	0.285
LB+Chior(blank)	Replicate 1	0.048	0.044
	Replicate 2	0.048	0.046
	Replicate 3	0.047	0.046
	Replicate 4	0.049	0.046

We also used colony 2 series to do the same experiments. The features are similar to colony group. However, Abs600 value of device 2 reach the same level of device 3.

2.2 Fluorescence

We used same colonies to measure their fluorescence values of device.

As it is shown in figure 8, Fluorescence value of device 1 is the highest while the value of device 3 is the lowest, which approaches to the value of counterpart of negative control.

At the second time, results of almost devices are in agreement to the first time, nevertheless, fluorescence value for device 2, which going to the highest.