Difference between revisions of "Team:Imperial College/Public Engagement"
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<h3>Communications Strategy Guide</h3> | <h3>Communications Strategy Guide</h3> | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
| − | <p>Following the Communications Strategy Guide, and in particular, the Science Communication Framework, we targeted 3 main audience types for our outreach efforts. These audiences include academic staff and students at Imperial, members of the public with no relation to synthetic biology and children/teenagers. Each outreach effort was optimized for its target audience and effort was taken to optimize for circumstances around the outreach effort. Lastly for most of our outreach efforts, feedback given was either recorded or verbally. | + | <p>Following the Communications Strategy Guide, and in particular, the Science Communication Framework, we targeted 3 main audience types for our outreach efforts. These audiences include academic staff and students at Imperial, members of the public with no relation to synthetic biology and children/teenagers. Each outreach effort was optimized for its target audience and effort was taken to optimize for circumstances around the outreach effort. Lastly for most of our outreach efforts, feedback given was either recorded or verbally. More information on the CSG can be found <b>here</b> |
</br></br> | </br></br> | ||
| − | We also wanted to gauge how our project may be implemented in the future. Surveys that were done to better characterize members of the general public's opinions of our technology and synthetic biology have shown to be inconclusive in correlating knowledge of synthetic biology and opposition of general use of synthetic biology. Hence outreach regarding future implementing our project have to keep into account bioethics and better show the potential beneficial effects of implementing our technology. With these conclusions in mind, we decided to host an art exhibition that would better visualize these potential beneficial effects, as well as a socio-ethics discussion to better address the ethics of controlling life. | + | We also wanted to gauge how our project may be implemented in the future. Surveys that were done to better characterize members of the general public's opinions of our technology and synthetic biology have shown to be inconclusive in correlating knowledge of synthetic biology and opposition of general use of synthetic biology. Hence outreach regarding future implementing our project have to keep into account bioethics and better show the potential beneficial effects of implementing our technology. With these conclusions in mind, we decided to host an art exhibition that would better visualize these potential beneficial effects, as well as a socio-ethics discussion to better address the ethics of controlling life. More information about our surveys can be found <b>here</b> |
</p> | </p> | ||
</br></br> | </br></br> | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
| − | We commissioned several artists to create art pieces for us. We will be displaying some of these pieces at the Giant Jamboree and have brought several of them to the Fair | + | Following the conclusions that members of the general public are more interested in the potential of our project than its inner workings, we decided to showcase the potential of our project visually through an art exhibition. We commissioned several artists to create art pieces for us. We will be displaying some of these pieces at the Giant Jamboree and have brought several of them to the New Scientist Live Fair. Images of the Art Exhibition are shown below.: |
| + | <b>IMAGES OF ART GALLERY</b> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
</br></br> | </br></br> | ||
| Line 42: | Line 43: | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
| − | We attended | + | We attended New Scientist Live Fair. At the event, we were doing outreach for synthetic biology as well as discussing with the public about our project. |
</p> | </p> | ||
</br></br> | </br></br> | ||
| Line 56: | Line 57: | ||
</br> | </br> | ||
<p> | <p> | ||
| − | + | In response to the need of dealing with bio-ethical considerations of our project, we hosted a socio-ethics discussion in collaboration with the synthetic biology society at Imperial College. We discussed the socio-ethical implications of synthetic biology as a field, as well as with specific regards to our project. There was a considerable audience turnout (more than a hundred) at the event. We were able to gather many perspectives on our project as a result of this discussion and will put it to good use integrating it in our project. Some of the thoughts and questions presented are available in a PDF file below. | |
</p> | </p> | ||
</br></br> | </br></br> | ||
Revision as of 23:26, 13 October 2018
Outreach and Education
How did we approach Outreach and Education?
These outreach events came because of the communication protocols using the science communication framework. We recognized that discussion of socio-ethics as well as a look at the potential of patterning applications in a way that is not abstract to the audience were the most effective methods in maintaining audience interest and approval of our project.
Communications Strategy Guide
Following the Communications Strategy Guide, and in particular, the Science Communication Framework, we targeted 3 main audience types for our outreach efforts. These audiences include academic staff and students at Imperial, members of the public with no relation to synthetic biology and children/teenagers. Each outreach effort was optimized for its target audience and effort was taken to optimize for circumstances around the outreach effort. Lastly for most of our outreach efforts, feedback given was either recorded or verbally. More information on the CSG can be found here We also wanted to gauge how our project may be implemented in the future. Surveys that were done to better characterize members of the general public's opinions of our technology and synthetic biology have shown to be inconclusive in correlating knowledge of synthetic biology and opposition of general use of synthetic biology. Hence outreach regarding future implementing our project have to keep into account bioethics and better show the potential beneficial effects of implementing our technology. With these conclusions in mind, we decided to host an art exhibition that would better visualize these potential beneficial effects, as well as a socio-ethics discussion to better address the ethics of controlling life. More information about our surveys can be found here
Art Exhibition
Following the conclusions that members of the general public are more interested in the potential of our project than its inner workings, we decided to showcase the potential of our project visually through an art exhibition. We commissioned several artists to create art pieces for us. We will be displaying some of these pieces at the Giant Jamboree and have brought several of them to the New Scientist Live Fair. Images of the Art Exhibition are shown below.: IMAGES OF ART GALLERY
New Scientist Live!
We attended New Scientist Live Fair. At the event, we were doing outreach for synthetic biology as well as discussing with the public about our project.
Board Game
We designed a board game as well as a video game to highlight key concepts in synthetic biology.
Socio-ethics Discussion
In response to the need of dealing with bio-ethical considerations of our project, we hosted a socio-ethics discussion in collaboration with the synthetic biology society at Imperial College. We discussed the socio-ethical implications of synthetic biology as a field, as well as with specific regards to our project. There was a considerable audience turnout (more than a hundred) at the event. We were able to gather many perspectives on our project as a result of this discussion and will put it to good use integrating it in our project. Some of the thoughts and questions presented are available in a PDF file below.
Synbio outreach at Imperial
Cuz we're cool and stuff
