Difference between revisions of "Team:Imperial College/Demonstrate"
| Line 191: | Line 191: | ||
<div type="button" class="accordion"> Description </div> | <div type="button" class="accordion"> Description </div> | ||
<div class="description"> | <div class="description"> | ||
| − | <p>PixCell | + | <p>We characterised the PixCell circuits in a series of steps in order to make them respond to an electronic input. In order to demonstrate if the PixCell construct is responsive to oxidation signals, we started by chemically inducing the circuit with oxidised pyocyanin in solution, as at the time we did not have an electrode setup that would work aerobically in solid cultures. Characterization experiments were performed by measuring cell growth and GFP expression at a range of increasing pyocyanin, ferricyanide and ferrocyanide concentrations, as fully described in the “Methods” section. |
| + | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div type="button" class="accordion">Relevance</div> | <div type="button" class="accordion">Relevance</div> | ||
<div class="panel expt2p"> | <div class="panel expt2p"> | ||
| − | <p >These results demonstrate that the assembled PixCell | + | <p >These results demonstrate that the assembled PixCell circuit can be switched on by oxidative signals and switched off by reductive signals. These experimental data were also handed over the dry lab, where information about fold induction and degradation rates supported and further implemented the theoretical models.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div type="button" class="accordion">Results</div> | <div type="button" class="accordion">Results</div> | ||
<div class="panel expt2p" style="transition:max-height 1s ease-in-out;"> | <div class="panel expt2p" style="transition:max-height 1s ease-in-out;"> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>As a first step, we investigated the effect of oxidised pyocyanin on cell health. We observed that pyocyanin concentrations higher than 10 uM significantly impacted cell health (figure 1). We then measured GFP expression at a range of different concentrations (figure 2). We found an optimal trade-off between cell health and GFP expression at a concentration of 2.5 uM, which is half of that used by (Tschirhart et al., 2017) in their anaerobic system (figure 3). We hypothesised that a reason for this lower concentration might be because in our aerobic system less oxidising input is required. Once identified our working pyocyanin concentration, that is the cellular redox-odulator, we varied the concentration of ferro/ferricyanide, the redox-modulators at the electrode interface, to find an optimal redox balance between pyocyanin and the reduced and oxidised forms of FCN (figure 5, 6, 7, 8) . As above, we investigated the effect of the redox molecules on cell health and identified the a FCN concentration (10 mM), which provided optimal balance between GFP expression and cell health. |
| + | </p> | ||
<div class="center"> | <div class="center"> | ||
| Line 242: | Line 244: | ||
<div type="button" class="accordion" >Summary</div> | <div type="button" class="accordion" >Summary</div> | ||
<div class="panel expt2p"> | <div class="panel expt2p"> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>These experiments allowed us to demonstrate that our constructs are responsive to oxidising input and enabled us to identify the concentrations of redox-molecule. These informations enabled us to formulate the chemical compositions for the next experiments in aerobic solid cultures. |
| + | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="clr"></div> | <div class="clr"></div> | ||
| Line 264: | Line 267: | ||
<div type="button" class="accordion"> Description </div> | <div type="button" class="accordion"> Description </div> | ||
<div class="description"> | <div class="description"> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>To demonstrate the ability of our electrode set-up to selectively oxidise and reduce our redox modulators in solution, we investigated the redox status of the our redox modulators with cyclic voltammetry (CV) and by measuring the absorbance at 390 nm with a plate reader. CV data showed that a voltage of +0.5 at the working electrode enables bulk oxidation, whereas a voltage of -0.4 allows bulk reduction. However, the presence of oxygen in aerobic environments interferes with the oxidation signal carried by the electrodes. Measuing optical absorbance at 390 nm with a plate reader, we then investigated the redox kinetics of pyocyanin in the presence of the reducing agent sodium sulfite. |
| + | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div type="button" class="accordion">Relevance</div> | <div type="button" class="accordion">Relevance</div> | ||
<div class="panel expt3p"> | <div class="panel expt3p"> | ||
| − | <p >These results that | + | <p >These results show that our set-up is able to selectively and reversibly oxidise and reduce our redox modulators. Furthermore , by performing these electrochemistry experiments, we proved that addition of the reducing agent sodium sulfite enables complete chemical reduction of the system, even in aerobic environment. |
| + | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div type="button" class="accordion">Results</div> | <div type="button" class="accordion">Results</div> | ||
<div class="panel expt3p" style="transition:max-height 1s ease-in-out;"> | <div class="panel expt3p" style="transition:max-height 1s ease-in-out;"> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>Cyclic Voltammetry was performed using a multichannel potentiostat connected to a computer. Reaction kinetics were performed using a FLUOstar BG Labtech plate reader, as describes in the “Methods” section. |
| + | </p> | ||
<div class="center"> | <div class="center"> | ||
| Line 293: | Line 299: | ||
<p class="center"><b>Figure 2.</b> Pyocyanin reduction by the reducing agent Sodium Sulfite</p> | <p class="center"><b>Figure 2.</b> Pyocyanin reduction by the reducing agent Sodium Sulfite</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>In order to chemically reduce our system, we added sodium sulfite as a reducing agent. We measured the concentration of oxidised pyocyanin in solutions with increasing sulfite concentration. As expected, the more sulphite added, the less absorption at 390 nm occurs (peak for oxidised pyocyanin). However this linear relationhiop resulted to be true only up to ca. 5% of sulphite. After that point it seems that an oxidised species is being produced. |
| + | </p> | ||
<div class="clr"></div> | <div class="clr"></div> | ||
| Line 302: | Line 309: | ||
<p><b>Figure 3.</b>Production of Pyocyanin Sulfonate at 2.5% Sulfite</p> | <p><b>Figure 3.</b>Production of Pyocyanin Sulfonate at 2.5% Sulfite</p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | <p>To dig deeper into the reasons of the unexpected non-linear relationship described above, we played with lower | + | <p>To dig deeper into the reasons of the unexpected non-linear relationship described above, we played with lower sulfite concentration. After searching in the literature (Glasser, 2017), we hypothesised that sulfite could react with pyocyanin, producing pyocyanin sultanate. because pyocyanin sulfonate has an absorption peak at 400 nm, we performed the same experiment as above but this time measuring the OD at both 390 and 400 nm. We found that at a concentration of 2.5 % of sulfite, there is appear of absorption at 400 nm, suggesting that pyocyanin sultanate is being produced. Because pyocyanin sulfonate is toxic to cells, , we carried the next experiments with lower sulfite concentration. |
| + | </p> | ||
</br></br> | </br></br> | ||
| Line 322: | Line 330: | ||
<div type="button" class="accordion" >Summary</div> | <div type="button" class="accordion" >Summary</div> | ||
<div class="panel expt3p"> | <div class="panel expt3p"> | ||
| − | <p>These results describe the first ever aerobic | + | <p>These results describe the first ever aerobic electrogenetic control system, that works both in liquid and solid E. coli cultures. </p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="clr"></div> | <div class="clr"></div> | ||
| Line 341: | Line 349: | ||
<div type="button" class="accordion"> Description </div> | <div type="button" class="accordion"> Description </div> | ||
<div class="description"> | <div class="description"> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>Here we demonstrated the first spatial activation of gene expression using electronic control. |
| + | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 351: | Line 360: | ||
<div type="button" class="accordion">Results</div> | <div type="button" class="accordion">Results</div> | ||
<div class="panel expt4p" style="transition:max-height 1s ease-in-out;"> | <div class="panel expt4p" style="transition:max-height 1s ease-in-out;"> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>An electrode rig was set up to apply these potentials to cells grown on an agar plate containing the final reaction condition of 2.5μM pyocyanin, 0.02% sodium sulfite and 10mM ferrocyanide. Redox reactions only occur at the electrode surface during an electrochemistry experiment, meaning that oxidised pyocyanin and ferrocyanide were only produced in close proximity to the working electrode upon the application of a +0.5V pulse. |
| − | + | ||
| + | Fluorescence images of agar plates clearly show localised expression of GFP around the electrode. This not only shows that the device allows for electronic control of gene expression, but also demonstrates high spatial control meaning it can be used for programmable spatial patterning of cell populations. | ||
| + | </p> | ||
| Line 519: | Line 530: | ||
<div type="button" class="accordion"> Description </div> | <div type="button" class="accordion"> Description </div> | ||
<div class="description"> | <div class="description"> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>Our electrogenetic control system relies on the electron carrying action of the redox-cycling drug pyocyanin, which is toxic metabolite from synthesised by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This poses limitations to our system, with regards to safety and possible applications. Therefore, we searched in the literature for alternative SoxR inducers and and tested potential non-toxic alternatives. Shown below are the characterization data for the best candidate alternative: phenazine, methosulfate. |
| + | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div type="button" class="accordion">Relevance</div> | <div type="button" class="accordion">Relevance</div> | ||
<div class="panel expt7p"> | <div class="panel expt7p"> | ||
| − | <p > | + | <p >These results demonstrate the first ever use of PMS as an electrogenetic inducer.</p> |
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 544: | Line 556: | ||
<div class="clr"></div> | <div class="clr"></div> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>This working concentration provided an X-fold increase in GFP expression. Previous research suggests this response could be improved ~10-fold further by supplementing the growth media with branched-chain amino acids, the synthesis of which is inhibited by PMS leading to cell death. </p> |
| − | + | ||
| Line 554: | Line 565: | ||
<div type="button" class="accordion" >Summary</div> | <div type="button" class="accordion" >Summary</div> | ||
<div class="panel expt7p"> | <div class="panel expt7p"> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>These results demonstrates the SoxR/pSoxS system that we devised, can be used a non-toxic and effective tool for chemical, as well as electronic, gene induction. PMS is also incredibly cheap, being 40,000x cheaper than pyocyanin, ~190x cheaper than arabinose and ~29x cheaper than aTc per reaction. |
| + | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="clr"></div> | <div class="clr"></div> | ||
| Line 575: | Line 587: | ||
<div type="button" class="accordion"> Description </div> | <div type="button" class="accordion"> Description </div> | ||
<div class="description"> | <div class="description"> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>We used the Gp2 toxin to create an electrogenetic device for biocontainment applications. Electronic activation of the SoxR/pSoxS transcription factor - promoter couple can inhibit cell growth by inducing expression of Gp2, a T7 phage-derived RNA polymerase inhibitor. The construct was assembled into a plasmid with a low-copy number pSC101 origin of replication to reduce the effect of promoter leakiness impacting on cell growth. |
| + | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div type="button" class="accordion">Relevance</div> | <div type="button" class="accordion">Relevance</div> | ||
<div class="panel expt8p"> | <div class="panel expt8p"> | ||
| − | <p > | + | <p >These results serve as proof of concepts for the biocontainment application, as described in the “Applications” sections |
| + | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| Line 620: | Line 634: | ||
<div type="button" class="accordion" >Summary</div> | <div type="button" class="accordion" >Summary</div> | ||
<div class="panel expt8p"> | <div class="panel expt8p"> | ||
| − | <p> | + | <p>With some improvement, and when used in combination with the PixCell electrode array, this biocontainment device could be used for biocontainment of GMOs in contained-use devices. This is analogous to how electric fences can be used to restrain livestock. |
| + | </p> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="clr"></div> | <div class="clr"></div> | ||
Revision as of 01:16, 16 October 2018
Results
Building and Testing Pixcell Constructs
Assembling the Pixcell Constructs
The PixCell Construct consists of a repurposed version of the soxRS regulon from E. coli, consisting of SoxR and GFP being expressed from either side of the pSoxR/pSoxS bidirectional promoter. pSoxR provides constitutive expression of SoxR. When oxidised, either directly by redox-cycling molecule or by oxidative stress, SoxR binds and activates transcription of GFP downstream of pSoxS.
Figure 1. Illustration of the PixCell Construct
The Pixcell construct was designed to test whether we could control the expression of GFP by controlling the oxidation state of SoxR through our electrochemical set up.
Using the Golden Gate assembly method, with two inserts; the SOXRS regulon and GFP, which were originally amplified out from the E. coli genome and a storage vector respectively, the construct was assembled. Gel electrophoresis showed that a construct of approximately the right length was produced and the construct was then sequence verified.
Figure 1. PCR results from the amplification of the entire construct
In order to lower the basal level of GFP expression a degradation tag was added. Therefore, any increase in GFP expression induced by the oxidation of SoxR would be more predominant.
Figure 1. Illustration of the PixCell Construct DegTag
The Pixcell construct enables us to test whether we can control gene expression by controlling the oxidation state of soxR. The Pixcell construct DegTag enables the system to be more dynamic in that seeing the system switch from on to off is quicker.
Characterizing Pixcell Constructs
We characterised the PixCell circuits in a series of steps in order to make them respond to an electronic input. In order to demonstrate if the PixCell construct is responsive to oxidation signals, we started by chemically inducing the circuit with oxidised pyocyanin in solution, as at the time we did not have an electrode setup that would work aerobically in solid cultures. Characterization experiments were performed by measuring cell growth and GFP expression at a range of increasing pyocyanin, ferricyanide and ferrocyanide concentrations, as fully described in the “Methods” section.
These results demonstrate that the assembled PixCell circuit can be switched on by oxidative signals and switched off by reductive signals. These experimental data were also handed over the dry lab, where information about fold induction and degradation rates supported and further implemented the theoretical models.
As a first step, we investigated the effect of oxidised pyocyanin on cell health. We observed that pyocyanin concentrations higher than 10 uM significantly impacted cell health (figure 1). We then measured GFP expression at a range of different concentrations (figure 2). We found an optimal trade-off between cell health and GFP expression at a concentration of 2.5 uM, which is half of that used by (Tschirhart et al., 2017) in their anaerobic system (figure 3). We hypothesised that a reason for this lower concentration might be because in our aerobic system less oxidising input is required. Once identified our working pyocyanin concentration, that is the cellular redox-odulator, we varied the concentration of ferro/ferricyanide, the redox-modulators at the electrode interface, to find an optimal redox balance between pyocyanin and the reduced and oxidised forms of FCN (figure 5, 6, 7, 8) . As above, we investigated the effect of the redox molecules on cell health and identified the a FCN concentration (10 mM), which provided optimal balance between GFP expression and cell health.
Figure 2.Ferricyanide dose response
Figure 3.Ferrocyanide dose response
Explain results here.
These experiments allowed us to demonstrate that our constructs are responsive to oxidising input and enabled us to identify the concentrations of redox-molecule. These informations enabled us to formulate the chemical compositions for the next experiments in aerobic solid cultures.
Electrochemistry of Redox Modulators
To demonstrate the ability of our electrode set-up to selectively oxidise and reduce our redox modulators in solution, we investigated the redox status of the our redox modulators with cyclic voltammetry (CV) and by measuring the absorbance at 390 nm with a plate reader. CV data showed that a voltage of +0.5 at the working electrode enables bulk oxidation, whereas a voltage of -0.4 allows bulk reduction. However, the presence of oxygen in aerobic environments interferes with the oxidation signal carried by the electrodes. Measuing optical absorbance at 390 nm with a plate reader, we then investigated the redox kinetics of pyocyanin in the presence of the reducing agent sodium sulfite.
These results show that our set-up is able to selectively and reversibly oxidise and reduce our redox modulators. Furthermore , by performing these electrochemistry experiments, we proved that addition of the reducing agent sodium sulfite enables complete chemical reduction of the system, even in aerobic environment.
Cyclic Voltammetry was performed using a multichannel potentiostat connected to a computer. Reaction kinetics were performed using a FLUOstar BG Labtech plate reader, as describes in the “Methods” section.
Figure 1. Square-wave voltammetry of redox modulator
The graphs above summarise the results showing that our system was consistently bulk reduced at -0.3V and bulk oxidised at +0.5V. The addition of Sulfite and cell containing the pixCell construct did not significantly alter the reduction and oxidation profile. These results led us to chose +0.5V as our oxidising potential in the following experiments testing the spatial electronic control of gene induction.
Figure 2. Pyocyanin reduction by the reducing agent Sodium Sulfite
In order to chemically reduce our system, we added sodium sulfite as a reducing agent. We measured the concentration of oxidised pyocyanin in solutions with increasing sulfite concentration. As expected, the more sulphite added, the less absorption at 390 nm occurs (peak for oxidised pyocyanin). However this linear relationhiop resulted to be true only up to ca. 5% of sulphite. After that point it seems that an oxidised species is being produced.
Figure 3.Production of Pyocyanin Sulfonate at 2.5% Sulfite
To dig deeper into the reasons of the unexpected non-linear relationship described above, we played with lower sulfite concentration. After searching in the literature (Glasser, 2017), we hypothesised that sulfite could react with pyocyanin, producing pyocyanin sultanate. because pyocyanin sulfonate has an absorption peak at 400 nm, we performed the same experiment as above but this time measuring the OD at both 390 and 400 nm. We found that at a concentration of 2.5 % of sulfite, there is appear of absorption at 400 nm, suggesting that pyocyanin sultanate is being produced. Because pyocyanin sulfonate is toxic to cells, , we carried the next experiments with lower sulfite concentration.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit, amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Excepturi, nisi illum. Consequuntur cum, sequi quo, esse facere corrupti voluptatum ipsum vel consequatur error quasi tenetur, repellat voluptatibus aspernatur optio mollitia! Lorem ipsum dolor sit, amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Excepturi, nisi illum. Consequuntur cum, sequi quo, esse facere corrupti voluptatum ipsum vel consequatur error quasi tenetur, repellat voluptatibus aspernatur optio mollitia!
These results describe the first ever aerobic electrogenetic control system, that works both in liquid and solid E. coli cultures.
Spatial Electronic Control of Gene Induction
Here we demonstrated the first spatial activation of gene expression using electronic control.
Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat.
An electrode rig was set up to apply these potentials to cells grown on an agar plate containing the final reaction condition of 2.5μM pyocyanin, 0.02% sodium sulfite and 10mM ferrocyanide. Redox reactions only occur at the electrode surface during an electrochemistry experiment, meaning that oxidised pyocyanin and ferrocyanide were only produced in close proximity to the working electrode upon the application of a +0.5V pulse. Fluorescence images of agar plates clearly show localised expression of GFP around the electrode. This not only shows that the device allows for electronic control of gene expression, but also demonstrates high spatial control meaning it can be used for programmable spatial patterning of cell populations.
Figure 1. PCR results of genomic extraction of SoxR from E. coli (including bi-directional promoter and SoxR protein gene)
Lorem ipsum dolor sit, amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Excepturi, nisi illum. Consequuntur cum, sequi quo, esse facere corrupti voluptatum ipsum vel consequatur error quasi tenetur, repellat voluptatibus aspernatur optio mollitia! Lorem ipsum dolor sit, amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Excepturi, nisi illum. Consequuntur cum, sequi quo, esse facere corrupti voluptatum ipsum vel consequatur error quasi tenetur, repellat voluptatibus aspernatur optio mollitia!
Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat.
Building and Characterizing the Pixcell Library
Creating the Sox Library
Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat.
Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat.
Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat. Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat.
Figure 1. PCR results of genomic extraction of SoxR from E. coli (including bi-directional promoter and SoxR protein gene)
Lorem ipsum dolor sit, amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Excepturi, nisi illum. Consequuntur cum, sequi quo, esse facere corrupti voluptatum ipsum vel consequatur error quasi tenetur, repellat voluptatibus aspernatur optio mollitia! Lorem ipsum dolor sit, amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Excepturi, nisi illum. Consequuntur cum, sequi quo, esse facere corrupti voluptatum ipsum vel consequatur error quasi tenetur, repellat voluptatibus aspernatur optio mollitia!
Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat.
Characterising the Sox Library
Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat.
Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat.
Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat. Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat.
Figure 1. PCR results of genomic extraction of SoxR from E. coli (including bi-directional promoter and SoxR protein gene)
Lorem ipsum dolor sit, amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Excepturi, nisi illum. Consequuntur cum, sequi quo, esse facere corrupti voluptatum ipsum vel consequatur error quasi tenetur, repellat voluptatibus aspernatur optio mollitia! Lorem ipsum dolor sit, amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Excepturi, nisi illum. Consequuntur cum, sequi quo, esse facere corrupti voluptatum ipsum vel consequatur error quasi tenetur, repellat voluptatibus aspernatur optio mollitia!
Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat.
Testing Alternative Redox Modulators
Testing Phenazine Methosulfate
Our electrogenetic control system relies on the electron carrying action of the redox-cycling drug pyocyanin, which is toxic metabolite from synthesised by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This poses limitations to our system, with regards to safety and possible applications. Therefore, we searched in the literature for alternative SoxR inducers and and tested potential non-toxic alternatives. Shown below are the characterization data for the best candidate alternative: phenazine, methosulfate.
These results demonstrate the first ever use of PMS as an electrogenetic inducer.
The above setup was used to perform Sqaure-wave voltammetry confirming that ferrocyanide was bulk reduced at -0.3V and bulk oxidised at +0.5V.
Figure 1. Phenazine as as Cheaper, Non-toxic Redox Modulator
This working concentration provided an X-fold increase in GFP expression. Previous research suggests this response could be improved ~10-fold further by supplementing the growth media with branched-chain amino acids, the synthesis of which is inhibited by PMS leading to cell death.
These results demonstrates the SoxR/pSoxS system that we devised, can be used a non-toxic and effective tool for chemical, as well as electronic, gene induction. PMS is also incredibly cheap, being 40,000x cheaper than pyocyanin, ~190x cheaper than arabinose and ~29x cheaper than aTc per reaction.
Applications
Biocontainment- Gp2 Growth Inhibition
We used the Gp2 toxin to create an electrogenetic device for biocontainment applications. Electronic activation of the SoxR/pSoxS transcription factor - promoter couple can inhibit cell growth by inducing expression of Gp2, a T7 phage-derived RNA polymerase inhibitor. The construct was assembled into a plasmid with a low-copy number pSC101 origin of replication to reduce the effect of promoter leakiness impacting on cell growth.
These results serve as proof of concepts for the biocontainment application, as described in the “Applications” sections
Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat. Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat.
Figure 1.pSoxS-Gp2 is an electronic-responsive growth inhibition
Figure 2.Negative controls
Explain results here.
With some improvement, and when used in combination with the PixCell electrode array, this biocontainment device could be used for biocontainment of GMOs in contained-use devices. This is analogous to how electric fences can be used to restrain livestock.
Fabric Bioprinting - Melanin
Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat.
Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat.
Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat. Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat.
Figure 1. PCR results of genomic extraction of SoxR from E. coli (including bi-directional promoter and SoxR protein gene)
Lorem ipsum dolor sit, amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Excepturi, nisi illum. Consequuntur cum, sequi quo, esse facere corrupti voluptatum ipsum vel consequatur error quasi tenetur, repellat voluptatibus aspernatur optio mollitia! Lorem ipsum dolor sit, amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Excepturi, nisi illum. Consequuntur cum, sequi quo, esse facere corrupti voluptatum ipsum vel consequatur error quasi tenetur, repellat voluptatibus aspernatur optio mollitia!
Lorem ipsum dolor, sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Recusandae dolore, tenetur expedita in architecto, repellat rerum minima cumque exercitationem debitis laborum fugit aliquam quo molestiae. Alias eius nostrum aspernatur quaerat.
