This year, we were glad that we can collaborate with team from University of Indonesia (UI_Indonesia). Our extensive collaboration ranges from wet lab to human practice. 

 How the Story Began?

We helped UI_Indonesia to clone their HT constructs as they faced great difficulty. The construct is a fusion of native Escherichia coli Tar chemotaxis receptor and human HB-EGF receptor which in the purpose of diphtheria toxin can be recognized by bacteria. This HT was designed and ordered in a gblock from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT).

Initially, UI_Indonesia ordered the HT gBlock as one fragment with a size ~1900 bp. However, they were informed that there was a problem during the construction, so they would need to change it and came up with ordering two separate fragments with one restriction between 2 parts, namely HT1 and HT2.

They planned to combine these two fragments together into a vector by ligation. However, when they tried to amplify HT1 to insert it in into a plasmid, they found out that the amplified product of HT1 was not specific. The size for HT1 was supposed to be ~1100 bp, but the band was very faint in 1100 bp. For HT2, there was a band at 800 bp, but it showed multiple bands, indicating low specificity. Because of this problem, UI_Indonesia sought help to ligate the two fragments together and put it in a backbone. Therefore, they asked us for help in ligating and cloning this fragment into a vector, so it would be easier to amplify and proceed for their assay.

Figure 1.  PCR Result of HT1 and HT2 from UI_Indonesia indicating non-specificity in amplification

How We Helped?

One of our team members Angelysia Cardilla managed to meet up with UI_Indonesia in Jakarta, Indonesia. We discussed about our projects and know more about each team project better. In the session, UI_Indonesia also passed us with the Gblocks that they wanted to cloned. 

Figure 2.  Meetup with UI_Indonesia

We cloned the HT1-HT2 fragments into the pcDNA3 backbone. Firstly, we kept all the gBlock fragment in the TOPO clone vector before amplifying them. We found that amplifying from TOPO template could lead to higher yield and efficiency. We designed some Gibson primers to combine the two fragments into the pcDNA3 vector. There were a total of 4 primers that we used to do Gibson cloning, HT1 F, HT1 R, HT2 F, and HT2 R. To check if the cloning was successful, we did colony PCR. We also confirmed the successful cloning of HT into pcDNA3 by sending the plasmid for sequencing. The sequence below shows the conjunction of the vector backbone and the HT construct, and the part that is not highlighted is pcDNA3 which has Ampicillin resistance as selective marker. 

Figure 3. Sequence of HT in pcDNA3

As they had faced difficulties in cloning these constructs and might face such problems again in preparing for part submission, we proposed to them to help to move HT fragment into BioBricks compatible vectors as one of their parts for submission. We cut both the backbone and the plasmid pcDNA3-HT1-HT2 to get the insert with restriction enzyme EcoRI and PstI. Afterward, we ligated them and transformed into competent cells, cultured them on the plate with CML resistance. The correct insertions were confirmed after colony PCR with VF2 and VR primers which show on the figure below. All the colony we picked show correct band size, indicating successful results. 

Figure 4. Colony PCR of psB1C3-HT 

Anticipated the possible difficulties they might have in preparing for part submission, we further offered to help them to insert their HT constructs to the psB1C3 vector and to make the plasmid BioBricks compatible. We also submitted on their behalf as BBa_K2607001 to save the unnecessary time and cost in shipping.

How They Helped Us?

UI_Indonesia also helped us for our human practice,   for both the outreach and the feedback garnering of our social study.  As a part of our study about public’s opinion regarding gene therapy, they helped us to translate our research questionnaire into Bahasa and spread to the society in Indonesia.

This was of great help as there were a great number of respondents from different educational background, age groups, gender to provide us with an extensive demographic profile, avoiding potential selection bias.  As Singapore and Indonesia are two countries in different phases of development, in terms of the social and religious environment, size of population, rules and regulations etc, with data from Indonesia, we were able to compare how the public opinion might differ for two different countries. 

Figure 5. Sample of data UI_Indonesia collected for us

Our main reason to extend our human practice to other countries is that we hope that ultimately gene therapy can be applied evenly to everyone in the world. Therefore, it is important to understand the public views of different countries with different socio-economic conditions. It is a good chance for us to utilize this collaborating opportunity with UI_Indonesia to conduct an international study regarding gene editing. We are also thankful that UI_Indonesia helped us to analyze the survey question for the study in Indonesia. From UI_Indonesia analysis, we found that most of Indonesians support gene therapy editing for treatment. However, most of the respondents also have many concerns about aspects of cost, safety, and ethics. They helped us with sampling and survey analysis and their results contributes to our human practice.

Figure 6. Outreach by UI_Indonesia

Apart from helping us in our study, UI_Indonesia also helped us in our outreach. We believe that it is important for the public to know more and be aware of this gene-editing therapy. Moreover, since gene editing is not a common issue, there is a lack of knowledge about this in Indonesia. Therefore, as a part of our outreach, UI_Indonesia helped us to educate students from the University of Indonesia so that they could be better prepared for gene editing technologies in the future.

We are pleased that we were able to share about our project to students in Indonesia through the help from UI_Indonesia . We prepared the material that we would like to be delivered in this outreach. The discussion was held in September and delivered in their campus auditorium. This session attracted about 60 students from Faculty of Engineering. We are very thankful that UI_Indonesia helped us to extend our outreach to the international community.

 Our Collaboration

This year, in our collaboration with Macquarie University Australia, We performed qPCR measurement for two of their constructs to verify plasmid gene expression profile upon IPTG induction. In return, we leveraged upon their protein purification and analysis technique to perform an EMSA shift in hope of observing improved DNA or gRNA binding by our improved tCas9 variants. Two improved variants with site specific mutations and were sent for analysis –

1. Rec2_HNH 5_6_10_15 HNH-pK

2. 3ple 5_6_10_15 HNH-pK

Figure 4. Colony PCR of psB1C3-HT