As IFFLs require a reporter and its inhibitor to be expressed at the same time, we needed a way to have both of these products induced at the same time. Previously, iGEM teams have found that IPTG-induced mf-Lon and ATC-induced mscarlet-I can be used together to produce a functioning IFFL circuit. This system is ideal for creating an IFFL, as using two different chemicals for induction allows for tight control of the expression parameters of both molecules. Through experimentation, this allows for the creation of a circuit with strong IFFL properties.

The first experiment we perused was ensuring that our chemically induced parts function as we expected. To do this, we transformed bacteria with a 3K3 plasmid containing the IPTG induced mf-Lon and a 1C3 plasmid containing the ATC induced mscarlet-I. We then tested these cells on the plate reader with a variety of induction conditions as per Figure 1.

Now that we verified that our mf-Lon and mScarlet-I are compatible together, we now began to screen for pulses. However, due to the long time course of our experiment, this presents a challenge for using FACS, as measurements need to be taken in regular intervals within a short time frame. In order to make experiments less labor intensive, we decided to freeze the bacteria in liquid nitrogen when the time points were taken. As can be seen in figure 2, the absolute difference in fluorescence between frozen cells vs non-frozen cells is less than 0.5%. Thus demonstrating that cells can be frozen in liquid nitrogen, and run through a FACS machine at a later, and more convenient time. See our preserving cells for flow cytometry page

With the new FACS protocol, we now had the ability to conduct longer, and more complex experiments, although running a FACS experiment for many different circuits and inductions combinations would still be very involved and time consuming. Due to the relative ease of running a plate reader experiment, a plate of different mf-lon and mscarletI circuit creations was made and tested with different induction conditions. As can be seen in figure 3, a system of mf-Lon and mscarletI is able to produce IFFL behavior.

Since we were using chemical inducers, turning the circuit off posed a bit of a challenge. As we did not possess advance microfluidic technology, we would need a way to remove the chemical inducers. In order to accomplish this, we decided to centrifuge the bacteria, then wash the pellets with media. To sufficiently wash out the inducer, this step would have to repeated at least three times. As can be seen in Figure 5, we were able to demonstrate that this protocol works.

With the new method to remove inducer from media, and the identification of IFFL parameters, we were able to demonstrate a stairwise pulse. As can be seen in Figure 5, we were able to produce this result. This is significant as this demonstrates the system we develop would be able to decode dynamic information via a stepwise increase in fluorescence.

While we were able to obtain promising results with the staircase behavior of our IFFL system, the chemical induction system came with significant drawbacks. The primary issue is that the protocol to remove inducer from media was extremely time consuming. Having to spin and wash each bioreplicate 3 times is very time consuming. Additionally, given the nature of the dynamic system we intended our IFFL system to work in, during the time spent carrying out the protocol, the dynamics of the system could change rapidly. Due to this significant limitation, we decided that we would need a new system of gene control. Ultimately, we chose to use a heat inducible system. See our Temperature Inducible Systems page to learn about what systems we moved to.