Line 264: | Line 264: | ||
font-size:13pt; | font-size:13pt; | ||
font-family:arial;"><b>Fig.3b</b> Fluorescein standard curve (log scale) | font-family:arial;"><b>Fig.3b</b> Fluorescein standard curve (log scale) | ||
+ | |||
+ | The non-linear fluorescence standard curve is conjectured to be a result of detector over-saturation. This could be inferred from a linear curve at low concentrations of fluorescein while reaching plateau at high concentrations. | ||
</figcaption></center> | </figcaption></center> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | <p> | + | <p> </p> |
− | < | + | <h2>Conversion of absorbance of cells to absorbance of a known concentration of beads.</h2> |
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<figure> | <figure> |
Revision as of 17:21, 17 October 2018
OUR INTERLAB OBJECTIVES
The iGEM Interlab 2018 aims to reduce lab-to-lab variability in fluorescence measurements that were shown in previous interlab studies which use an optical density (O.D.) as the normalization method of fluorescence. Since O.D. is an approximation of cell number, the interlab this year attempts to address the problem by two orthogonal approaches. Hypothesized that silica beads have similar light scattering properties as the cells due to their similarities in size and shape, one of the approaches is to convert the absorbance of cells to the absorbance of a known concentration of silica beads [1]. Adopting a more direct normalization method, the other approach is to normalize the absorbance of cells by absolute cell counts or colony-forming units (CFU).
Method:
All procedures were performed according to the given iGEM protocol [2], except that the O.D. measurement setting was changed from OD600 to OD595, due to the limited options of plate reader in HKUST. After further discussion with the iGEM headquarter, we retained the data to be OD595.
Machines, materials and parts:
Machines:
Envision Multilabel Reader (Model: EnVision Xcite)
*To know more about the setting of EnVision multilabel reader, please click
Materials:
.
Parts:
Parts | Parts location on the kits plate | Parts used as the promoter(strength) | Parts used as the RBS(Efficiency) | Reporter Gene | Parts used as the Terminator |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive Control(BBa_I20270) | Plate 7 Well 2B | BBa_J23151 (nil) | BBa_B0032 (0.3) | GFP | BBa_B0010, BBa_B0012 |
Negative Control (BBa_R0040) | Plate 7 Well 2D | BBa_R0040 (nil) | nil | GFP | BBa_B0010, BBa_B0012 |
Test Device 1 (BBa_J364000) | Plate 7 Well 2F | BBa_J23101 (1791au) | BBa_B0034 (1.0) | GFP | BBa_B0010, BBa_B0012 |
Test Device 2 (BBa_J364001) | Plate 7 Well 2H | BBa_J23106 (1185au) | BBa_B0034 (1.0) | GFP | BBa_B0010, BBa_B0012 |
Test Device 3 (BBa_J364002) | Plate 7 Well 2J | BBa_J23117 (162au) | BBa_B0034 (1.0) | GFP | BBa_B0010, BBa_B0012 |
Test Device 4 (BBa_J364007) | Plate 7 Well 2L | BBa_J23100(2547au) | BBa_B0034* (nil) | GFP | BBa_B0010, BBa_B0012 |
Test Device 4 (BBa_J364007) | Plate 7 Well 2L | BBa_J23100(2547au) | BBa_B0034* (nil) | GFP | BBa_B0010, BBa_B0012 |
Result:
Calibrations:
Conversion factor of OD600(OD600/Abs600) = 3.036
LUDOX CL-X | H20 | |
---|---|---|
Replicate 1 | 0.045 | 0.024 |
Replicate 2 | 0.045 | 0.025 |
Replicate 3 | 0.044 | 0.024 |
Replicate 4 | 0.049 | 0.027 |
Arithmethic mean | 0.046 | 0.025 |
Corrected Abs600 | 0.021 | |
Reference OD600 | 0.063 | |
OD600/Abs600 | 3.036 |
Conversion of absorbance of cells to absorbance of a known concentration of beads.
Counting colony-forming units (CFUs) from the sample
Colonies count:
Negative control (BBa_R0040):
Dillution 3 | Dillution 4 | Dillution 5 | |
---|---|---|---|
Colony 1, Replicate 1 | 180 | 13 | 3 |
Colony 1, Replicate 2 | 120 | 14 | 3 |
Colony 1, Replicate 3 | 197 | 33 | 2 |
Colony 2, Replicate 1 | 283 | 33 | 2 |
Colony 2, Replicate 2 | 214 | 28 | 3 |
Colony 2, Replicate 3 | 218 | 29 | 1 |
Positive control ((BBa_I120270):
Dillution 3 | Dillution 4 | Dillution 5 | |
---|---|---|---|
Colony 1, Replicate 1 | 228 | 29 | 1 |
Colony 1, Replicate 2 | 184 | 25 | 1 |
Colony 1, Replicate 3 | 153 | 25 | 1 |
Colony 2, Replicate 1 | 254 | 19 | 3 |
Colony 2, Replicate 2 | 168 | 27 | 2 |
Colony 2, Replicate 3 | 213 | 24 | 3 |
Colony-forming unit (CFU): Negative control (BBa_R0040):
Dillution 3 | Dillution 4 | Dillution 5 | |
---|---|---|---|
Colony 1, Replicate 1 | 1.44E+07 | 1.04E+07 | 2.40E+07 |
Colony 1, Replicate 2 | 9.60E+06 | 1.12E+07 | 2.40E+07 |
Colony 1, Replicate 3 | 1.58E+07 | 2.64E+07 | 1.60E+07 |
Colony 2, Replicate 1 | 2.26E+07 | 1.84E+07 | 1.60E+07 |
Colony 2, Replicate 2 | 1.71E+07 | 2.24E+07 | 2.40E+07 |
Colony 2, Replicate 3 | 1.74E+07 | 2.32E+07 | 8.00E+06 |
Average
- Colony 1: 1.69E+07 CFU/ml/0.1OD
- Colony 2: 1.88E+07 CFU/ml/0.1OD
- Average: 1.785E+07 CFU/ml/0.1OD
- Using conversion factor OD/Abs= 3.036
- Conversion factor: CFU/Abs/ml= 54.34 CFU/Abs/ml
Conclusion:
There is no significant difference in the pattern of normalized fluorescence values between using O.D. and particle count, as illustrated in Figure 4 and 5. The normalized fluorescence values of the devices are consistent with their respective promoter strengths, with device 1 (BBa_J23101) as the highest fluorescence value (i.e. 1791 a.u.) and device 3 (BBa_J23117) as the lowest fluorescence value (i.e. 162 a.u.). However, cell quantification by colony-forming units failed to reproduce the modeled cell concentration by silica beads. This may conclude that the two methods, CFU cell count and silica beads, may not be able to produce a consistent value of cell concentration.
REFERENCES:
1. Measurement/InterLab - 2018.igem.org", 2018.igem.org, 2018. Available: https://2018.igem.org/Measurement/InterLab
2. InterLab Plate Reader Protocol. The 2018 International Genetically Engineered Machine. Available:https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/09/2018_InterLab_Plate_Reader_Protocol.pdf