Difference between revisions of "Team:Newcastle/Results"
(Prototype team page) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| + | <h2>Bacterial Chemotactic Response to Naringenin</h2> | ||
| + | <p>The Alternative Root project revolves around the idea of chemical signals which alter the soil microbiome with the main goal of aiding the nitrogen nourishment of plants. As such, it was important to be able to measure how our selected nitrogen fixers (<i>Azospirillum brasilense</i>,<i>Herbaspirillum seropedicae</i> and <i>Azorhizobium caulinodans</i>), <i>Pseudomonas fluorescens</i>, our root endophyte, and <i>Escherichia coli</i> interact with different concentrations of naringenin; otherwise the possibility that the transformed <i>E. coli</i> and eventually the <i>P. fluorescens</i> would produce too much of a known antimicrobial compound thus killing the bacteria,too little to elicit a response, or produce a compound that did not elicit the expected response. Therefore, chemotaxis assays were integral to ensuring that concept would work</p> | ||
<div class="column third_size" > | <div class="column third_size" > | ||
Revision as of 09:52, 8 August 2018
Results
Here you can describe the results of your project and your future plans.
Bacterial Chemotactic Response to Naringenin
The Alternative Root project revolves around the idea of chemical signals which alter the soil microbiome with the main goal of aiding the nitrogen nourishment of plants. As such, it was important to be able to measure how our selected nitrogen fixers (Azospirillum brasilense,Herbaspirillum seropedicae and Azorhizobium caulinodans), Pseudomonas fluorescens, our root endophyte, and Escherichia coli interact with different concentrations of naringenin; otherwise the possibility that the transformed E. coli and eventually the P. fluorescens would produce too much of a known antimicrobial compound thus killing the bacteria,too little to elicit a response, or produce a compound that did not elicit the expected response. Therefore, chemotaxis assays were integral to ensuring that concept would work
What should this page contain?
- Clearly and objectively describe the results of your work.
- Future plans for the project.
- Considerations for replicating the experiments.
Describe what your results mean
- Interpretation of the results obtained during your project. Don't just show a plot/figure/graph/other, tell us what you think the data means. This is an important part of your project that the judges will look for.
- Show data, but remember all measurement and characterization data must be on part pages in the Registry.
- Consider including an analysis summary section to discuss what your results mean. Judges like to read what you think your data means, beyond all the data you have acquired during your project.
Project Achievements
You can also include a list of bullet points (and links) of the successes and failures you have had over your summer. It is a quick reference page for the judges to see what you achieved during your summer.
- A list of linked bullet points of the successful results during your project
- A list of linked bullet points of the unsuccessful results during your project. This is about being scientifically honest. If you worked on an area for a long time with no success, tell us so we know where you put your effort.
Inspiration
See how other teams presented their results.