INTERLAB
OUR INTERLAB OBJECTIVES
The iGEM Interlab 2018 aims to reduce lab-to-lab variability in fluorescence measurements that was shown in previous interlab studies to originate from using optical density (O.D.) as the normalisation method of fluorescence. Since O.D. is an approximation of cell number, the interlab this year attempts to address the problem by adopting a more direct normalisation method. That is, the use of absolute cell count or colony-forming units (CPU).
Method:
All procedures were performed according to the protocols iGEM given. Except that the O.D. measurement setting was changed from OD600 to OD595, due to the limited options of plate reader in HKUST. After further discussion with the iGEM headquarter, we retained the data to be OD595.
Machines, materials and parts:
- Envision Multilabel Reader (Model: EnVision Xcite)
Machines:
*To know more about the setting of EnVision multilabel reader, please click
- LUDOX CL-X: 45% colloidal silica suspension, used as single reference point for converting absorbance (Abs600) to OD600
. - Silica beads: Microsphere suspension that mimics the shape and size of typical E.coli cell. With known concentration, it can be used for the conversion of absorbance measurement to the universal standard concentration of bead measurement.
- Fluorescein: Sodium fluorescein was used for obtaining the standard fluorescence curve.
- E.coli strain DH5αCompetent cell: used for transformation, the protocol used for making it can view in here
Materials:
parts:
Parts | Parts location on the kits plate | Parts used as the promoter(strength) | Parts used as the RBS(Efficiency) | Reporter Gene | Parts used as the Terminator |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive Control(BBa_I20270) | Plate 7 Well 2B | BBa_J23151 (nil) | BBa_B0032 (0.3) | GFP | BBa_B0010, BBa_B0012 |
Negative Control (BBa_R0040) | Plate 7 Well 2D | BBa_R0040 (nil) | nil | ||
Test Device 1 (BBa_J364000) | Plate 7 Well 2F | BBa_J23101 (1791au) | BBa_B0034 (1.0) | ||
Test Device 2 (BBa_J364001) | Plate 7 Well 2H | BBa_J23106 (1185au) | |||
Test Device 3 (BBa_J364002) | Plate 7 Well 2J | BBa_J23117 (162au) | |||
Test Device 4 (BBa_J364007) | Plate 7 Well 2L | BBa_J23100(2547au) | BBa_B0034* (nil) | ||
Test Device 4 (BBa_J364007) | Plate 7 Well 2L | BBa_J23100(2547au) | BBa_B0034* (nil) |
Result:
Calibrations:
Conversion factor of OD600(OD600/Abs600) = 3.036LUDOX CL-X | H20 | |
---|---|---|
Replicate 1 | 0.045 | 0.024 |
Replicate 2 | 0.045 | 0.025 |
Replicate 3 | 0.044 | 0.024 |
Replicate 4 | 0.049 | 0.027 |
Arithmethic mean | 0.046 | 0.025 |
Corrected Abs600 | 0.021 | |
Reference OD600 | 0.063 | |
OD600/Abs600 | 3.036 |
Converting between absorbance of cells to absorbance of a known concentration of beads.
Counting colony-forming units (CFUs) from the sample
Colonies count:
Negative control (BBa_R0040):
Dillution 3 | Dillution 4 | Dillution 5 | |
---|---|---|---|
Colony 1, Replicate 1 | 180 | 13 | 3 |
Colony 1, Replicate 2 | 120 | 14 | 3 |
Colony 1, Replicate 3 | 197 | 33 | 2 |
Colony 2, Replicate 1 | 283 | 33 | 2 |
Colony 2, Replicate 2 | 214 | 28 | 3 |
Colony 2, Replicate 3 | 218 | 29 | 1 |
Dillution 3 | Dillution 4 | Dillution 5 | |
---|---|---|---|
Colony 1, Replicate 1 | 228 | 29 | 1 |
Colony 1, Replicate 2 | 184 | 25 | 1 |
Colony 1, Replicate 3 | 153 | 25 | 1 |
Colony 2, Replicate 1 | 254 | 19 | 3 |
Colony 2, Replicate 2 | 168 | 27 | 2 |
Colony 2, Replicate 3 | 213 | 24 | 3 |
Dillution 3 | Dillution 4 | Dillution 5 | |
---|---|---|---|
Colony 1, Replicate 1 | 1.44E+07 | 1.04E+07 | 2.40E+07 |
Colony 1, Replicate 2 | 9.60E+06 | 1.12E+07 | 2.40E+07 |
Colony 1, Replicate 3 | 1.58E+07 | 2.64E+07 | 1.60E+07 |
Colony 2, Replicate 1 | 2.26E+07 | 1.84E+07 | 1.60E+07 |
Colony 2, Replicate 2 | 1.71E+07 | 2.24E+07 | 2.40E+07 |
Colony 2, Replicate 3 | 1.74E+07 | 2.32E+07 | 8.00E+06 |
- Colony 1: 1.69E+07 CFU/ml/0.1OD
- Colony 2: 1.88E+07 CFU/ml/0.1OD
- Average: 1.785E+07 CFU/ml/0.1OD
- Using conversion factor OD/Abs= 3.036
- Conversion factor: CFU/Abs/ml= 54.34 CFU/Abs/ml
Conclusion:
Overall, the result obtained was reasonable. Among all device, device 1 reach overall highest fluorescence level while device show the lowest, the outcome is due to the different of promoter of GFP. Since the strength of promoter of device affect the expression of GFP. According to the Part Registry, promoter strength of device 1 (BBa_J23101), device 2 (BBa_J23106), device 3 (BBa_J23117), device 4 (BBa_J23100), device 5 (BBa_J23104) and device 6 (BBa_J23116) are 1791, 1185, 162, 2547, 1830 and 396 au respectively. This may explain the difference levels of GFP produced.
REFERENCES:
The 2018 International Genetically Engineered Machine. (17 July, 2018). Tracks/Measurement/Interlab study/Plate Reader Protocol. Retrieved from https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/09/2018_InterLab_Plate_Reader_Protocol.pdf
Registry of Standard Biological Parts (2018-04-17) Retrieved from http://parts.igem.org/assembly/plates.cgi?id=5641