Electroporations
Results of One-Tube Electroporation
Electroporation into E. coli
At the core of the Broad Host Range Kit is the One Test Tube Method of testing plasmids in a host bacteria. This is how the majority of people who get our kit for the first time will begin their experiments. The idea here is that a researcher will be able to transform multiple assembled plasmids at once ,and then through selective plating see which works in the non-model organisms. This will give the researcher insight for what origin of replication works, which is the first step in building a plasmid to genetically engineering an organism. Results will be confirmed by one of two ways: assessing the phenotype produced by the reporter gene or sequencing at the barcode region . The reporter is either a fluorescent protein or chromoprotein specific and each color designates an origin. At a genomic level, a unique, non-coding sequence of DNA does the same thing, specifying which origin it is paired with. We created our one tube mixture of the initial assemblies by calculating an equimolar concentration.
The pictures to the right represent our first trials to see if the one tube method would work. The first mixture had 8 different assemblies (pAMB1+AMP, pMB1+AMP, p15A+CAM, pAMB1+CAM, pAMB1+KAN, pMB1+KAN, P15a+kan, p15A+tet) and bacteria transformed with it was plated on 4 different plates, each with different antibiotic to select for E. coli expressing a plasmid with the corresponding antibiotic resistance. The p15a and pMB1 have a green fluorescent phenotype and the pAMB1 is paired with e2 crimson reporter, which appears black in normal light and red under UV. The results here were that only E.coli grew with active reporter genes on the KAN and CAM plates but not CRB and TET. The second mixture contained only 3 plasmids, pAMB1+KAN, pMB1+kan, and p15A+kan, and was plated on a single KAN plate. We believe we did not see growth for CRB and TET because the DNA concentration might have been to low or they could have taken longer time in incubation.
Rice University performed the same initial tests independently. One tube had 8 different assemblies (pAMB1+AMP, pMB1+AMP, p15A+CAM, pAMB1+CAM, pAMB1+KAN, pMB1+KAN, P15a+KAN, p15A+TET). This reaction was plated on 4 different plates, each with different antibiotic. The purpose here was so that only the E. coli that had picked up each specific assembly would grow on each plate. The results here were that only E. coli grew with active reporter genes on the KAN and CAM and this time on CRB as well. Their CRB plate was left to grow longer than ours, which might signify why they saw positive results.TET was not plated because Rice University did not have the antibiotic available.. The second tube contained only 3 reactions and these were pAMB1+KAN, pMB1+KAN, and p15A+KAN, this was plated on a single KAN plate.
Electroporation into Vibrio natriegens
We used the same assemblies in reaction tube 1 from E.coli and transformed into Vibrio natriegens. The reaction contained 8 assemblies. These assemblies were pAMB1+AMP, pMB1+AMP, p15A+CAM, pAMB1+CAM, pAMB1+KAN, pMB1+KAN, P15a+kan, p15A+tet. They were plated only in KAN, CRB, and CAM. There was a second transformation that involved a positive control provided by the Vmax kit. Colony growth was seen only in KAN and CAM plates. No type of reporter color was seen in any plate. The KAN plate has two size colonies growing.
Transformation into Vibrio natriegens was only really seen in the KAN plate, which again should have had 3 assemblies We see two types of colonies, and we know that different plasmids are different lengths, so we could assume that that would relate to different colony sizes. The single colony that grew in CAM is an unknown. It is still unclear on why the lack of growth occurred in the CRB plate, and it is possible that the lack of growth in the positive control was due to its ineffectiveness. We received the positive control from the Barrick lab and they were unsure if it was used, or if it had gone bad.
We have several options for next steps. These involve picking colonies and plating them on new plates to see if they grow normally, and/or sequencing colonies for their barcodes which are specific to origins. This will allow us to check which origins are working. From there on we might want to retransform.
Electroporation into Mu-Free Donor E. coli
In order to test the BHR kit’s function in a diverse array of organisms, we demonstrated how a one tube plasmid mix, which contained multiple assembly plasmids, could be transformed into DAP auxotrophic Mu Free Donor (MFD) E. coli cells. These transformed Mu Free Donors would ultimately be used to conjugate with non-model organisms in which electroporation is not a viable option for transformation. When attempting to conjugate with a target non-model organism, donor cells carrying the BHR plasmids must first be created. Rather than performing an independent transformation with the donor cells for each assembly plasmid, it is more time-efficient to perform a single procedure that transforms all of the assembly plasmids into the donor cells that is followed by a selection of the recovered cells. In this demonstration, we show the how the one tube transformation can easily be applied to Mu Free Donors for conjugation.
Electrocompetent MFU donors were electroporated with a single mix of DNA containing eight assembly plasmids. This eight-assembly mix consisted of two plasmids conferring AMP resistance, two plasmids conferring CAM resistance, three plasmids conferring KAN resistance, and a single plasmid conferring TET resistance. Therefore, the selective plates used to plate the transformation recoveries were AMP, CAM, KAN, and TET plates. The antibiotics were added to the media at a 1:1000 ratio, and the media was supplemented with DAP at 6 µl DAP per ml of media. The electrocompetent MFD cells were transformed via electroporation on settings suitable for E. coli and allowed to recover for an hour at 37°C. 100 µl of the recovery was plated on each selective plate and incubated overnight. The results of this demonstration are shown left.
Future Directions
Once we have created enough unique origins of replications, we could potentially use the arsenal of reporters we have in our kit, which include a Blue Chromoprotein, Pink Chromoprotein, Purple Chromoprotein, Green Fluorescent Protein, E2 Crimson, Red Chromoprotein and Green Chromoprotein. In theory, we could test 7 different origins of replication in our organism of interest and be able to visually screen for which ORI(s) work with the host's cellular machinery.