Collaborations
During the iGEM competition we have prioritised building meaningful relationships and collaborations with other teams. Through them we learned more about other projects, built friendships, experienced the diversity which is inherent to the competition and were able to further improve our own project. Below are the highlights of our endeavors.
iGEM team Bordeaux saw an opportunity to collaborate with us when they found out through our social media coverage that our project involved the
detection of bacterial
cell stress.
iGEM Bordeauxs project is about producing a bacterial strain that transforms hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF)
to furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA).
iGEM Bordeaux uses HMF in their project as an intermediate
to create FDCAHMF
is a byproduct of the degradation of cellulose or other polysaccharides and is known to be toxic to bacteria. FCDA is a platform molecule that can be polymerized in plastics or biofuels.
Because HMF is a known toxin, iGEM Bordeaux suggested it would be interesting for us to test this on our bacterial stress detection system, and we wholeheartedly agreed.
Following a skype session to discuss the details of our collaboration, Bordeaux send us 2mL of solution containing 5 g/L HMF. This allowed us to test the compound at various concentrations on four of our stress detection strains: DnaK is involved in
the process of chromosomal DNA replication[1][2]. Read more about pDnaK on its iGEM registry pagepDnaK, RpoE
has been shown to seemingly be involved in the exocytoplasmic stress response. Read more about pRpoE on its iGEM registry pagepRpoE, pSoxS has been found to be involved in the superoxide pathway and responds to DNA damage. Read more about pSoxS on its iGEM registry pagepSoxS
and CspA is involved in cold-shock stress pathways. Furthermore, it is known that the transcription of the CspA-promoter can be
abolished almost
completely by the use of rifampicin or nalidixic acid[3]. Read more about pCspA on its iGEM registry
pagepCspA.
Results of exposure to HMF show no stress reaction for the pCspA-GFP (Figure 1A) and pRpoE-GFP (Figure 1C) strains. CspA is involved in metabolism related stress and RpoE is involved in protein synthesis stress.
Because both strains did not invoke a stress reaction, there is no indication that HMF delivers stress in these pathways. However, to firmly conclude these stresses are not being experienced, more extensive testing is needed, since these
are just two promoters involved in these stress pathways.
Both the pDnaK-GFP (Figure 1B) and pSoxS-GFP strains (Figure 1D) do show some response when exposed to 0.5 μg/mL HMF. DnaK is involved in the process of chromosomal DNA replication and SoxS is involved in DNA damage repair.
Therefore, these results indicate that HMF delivers stress to bacteria by damaging their DNA and disturbing their replication process. However, the stress being experienced at these HMF concentrations seems to be low.