Line 289: | Line 289: | ||
<h2 class="w3">THE STOCKHOLM CONVENTION</h2> | <h2 class="w3">THE STOCKHOLM CONVENTION</h2> | ||
− | <p align="justify" style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;"> | + | <p align="justify" style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;text-align:justify"> |
In the 1990s, it became apparent that the international community needed to take action aimed at reducing persistent organic pollutants (POPs) to protect the environment and human health. This led to the formation of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants which was established on May 17, 2004. By 2005, over 150 countries had signed while 98 had ratified the Convention. | In the 1990s, it became apparent that the international community needed to take action aimed at reducing persistent organic pollutants (POPs) to protect the environment and human health. This led to the formation of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants which was established on May 17, 2004. By 2005, over 150 countries had signed while 98 had ratified the Convention. | ||
<br /><br /> | <br /><br /> | ||
Line 299: | Line 299: | ||
<h2 class="w3">Regulation in Israel</h2> | <h2 class="w3">Regulation in Israel</h2> | ||
− | <p align="justify" style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;"> | + | <p align="justify" style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;text-align:justify"> |
The Israeli Union for Environmental Defense is a non-profit organization that handles legal battles involved in environmental and health-related laws, regulation and governmental approvals In Israel. Through our correspondence with them, we have learned that Israel`s regulation is focused on limiting emissions, not production; meaning industrial facilities are allowed to produce as much dioxin as they wish but may not release them into the environment. This concerned us because a) there is no oversight of how much dioxin is produced, and b) the oversight of emissions seems to be very lax. </p> | The Israeli Union for Environmental Defense is a non-profit organization that handles legal battles involved in environmental and health-related laws, regulation and governmental approvals In Israel. Through our correspondence with them, we have learned that Israel`s regulation is focused on limiting emissions, not production; meaning industrial facilities are allowed to produce as much dioxin as they wish but may not release them into the environment. This concerned us because a) there is no oversight of how much dioxin is produced, and b) the oversight of emissions seems to be very lax. </p> | ||
<div class="w3-center"> | <div class="w3-center"> | ||
Line 307: | Line 307: | ||
− | <div id="Adam_full" class="collapse" style="text-align: | + | <div id="Adam_full" class="collapse" style="text-align:justify; padding:50px;"> |
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 319: | Line 319: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
− | <p align="justify" style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;"> | + | <p align="justify" style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;text-align:justify"> |
<b> In your 2014 report on the emissions of hazardous substances, it was mentioned that the State of Israel had signed the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants treaty in 2001. The report states that, despite the signing, the state has not yet ratified it. What is needed for "ratification" to take place and has there been any progress on the issue since. | <b> In your 2014 report on the emissions of hazardous substances, it was mentioned that the State of Israel had signed the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants treaty in 2001. The report states that, despite the signing, the state has not yet ratified it. What is needed for "ratification" to take place and has there been any progress on the issue since. | ||
</b> | </b> | ||
Line 333: | Line 333: | ||
<h2 class="w3">Regulation in Estonia</h2> | <h2 class="w3">Regulation in Estonia</h2> | ||
− | <p align="justify" style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;"> | + | <p align="justify" style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;text-align:justify"> |
Through collaboration with the Tartu University team, we were able to learn more about dioxin pollution in Estonia and the Baltic Sea. Estonian regulations are in line with those found in the EU. Though dioxin emissions in Estonia were lower than expected (when measured in 2003), there were still moderate pollution rates. It was estimated that large amount of pollutants comes with air masses from the Czech Republic, Germany and Poland . Dioxins enter the Baltic Sea as air fallout when transported from land-based sources which could be attributed to chemical and forest industries [especially in Russia where use of chlorine gas in these industries is still common practice]. </p> | Through collaboration with the Tartu University team, we were able to learn more about dioxin pollution in Estonia and the Baltic Sea. Estonian regulations are in line with those found in the EU. Though dioxin emissions in Estonia were lower than expected (when measured in 2003), there were still moderate pollution rates. It was estimated that large amount of pollutants comes with air masses from the Czech Republic, Germany and Poland . Dioxins enter the Baltic Sea as air fallout when transported from land-based sources which could be attributed to chemical and forest industries [especially in Russia where use of chlorine gas in these industries is still common practice]. </p> | ||
<div class="w3-center"> | <div class="w3-center"> | ||
Line 353: | Line 353: | ||
<h2 class="w3">Regulation in Australia</h2> | <h2 class="w3">Regulation in Australia</h2> | ||
− | <p align="justify" style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;">Australian regulation are also based on the limits that were accepted at the time of Stockholm convention (TEQ value below 0.1 ng). The Australian government announced a four-year National Dioxins Program back in 2001 to reduce dioxins and dioxin-like substances in the environment. </p> | + | <p align="justify" style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;text-align:justify">Australian regulation are also based on the limits that were accepted at the time of Stockholm convention (TEQ value below 0.1 ng). The Australian government announced a four-year National Dioxins Program back in 2001 to reduce dioxins and dioxin-like substances in the environment. </p> |
− | <p align="justify" style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;"> The studies [from Australia] show that the levels of dioxins in food, people and the environment are generally low when compared with levels internationally. They also showed that the risks to human health and the environment are low. Although there were only a small number of samples analyzed, these studies provided the largest survey of dioxin levels taken in Australia to date. | + | <p align="justify" style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;text-align:justify"> The studies [from Australia] show that the levels of dioxins in food, people and the environment are generally low when compared with levels internationally. They also showed that the risks to human health and the environment are low. Although there were only a small number of samples analyzed, these studies provided the largest survey of dioxin levels taken in Australia to date. |
</p> | </p> | ||
<h2 align="justify" class="w3">References:</h2> | <h2 align="justify" class="w3">References:</h2> | ||
− | <p align="justify" style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;"> | + | <p align="justify" style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;text-align:justify"> |
1. Dioxin and Furan Inventories. National and Regional Emissions of PCDD/PCDF. 1999. Prepared by | 1. Dioxin and Furan Inventories. National and Regional Emissions of PCDD/PCDF. 1999. Prepared by | ||
UNEP Chemicals, IOMC, Geneva, Switzerland, 120p. <br /> | UNEP Chemicals, IOMC, Geneva, Switzerland, 120p. <br /> | ||
Line 415: | Line 415: | ||
<h2 class="w3">Main sources of dioxin in each continent:</h2> | <h2 class="w3">Main sources of dioxin in each continent:</h2> | ||
<h3 class="w3-center">Europe</h3> | <h3 class="w3-center">Europe</h3> | ||
− | <p style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;"> The continent of Europe is one of the main producers of dioxins worldwide. The emissions are produced both from industrial activities and nonindustrial burning processes. The ambient concentration varies depending on the climate, residential activities, and the degree of development and social awareness of the inhabitants in the respective countries. Among them, heavily industrialized countries like Germany were the main producers of dioxins until a few years ago (1990s) when stricter legislation and the implementation of more efficient treatment mechanisms led to the decrease of emissions to minimal values. Other industrialized countries like Poland, where less strict legislation is applied, have not shown the same progression. | + | <p style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;text-align:justify"> The continent of Europe is one of the main producers of dioxins worldwide. The emissions are produced both from industrial activities and nonindustrial burning processes. The ambient concentration varies depending on the climate, residential activities, and the degree of development and social awareness of the inhabitants in the respective countries. Among them, heavily industrialized countries like Germany were the main producers of dioxins until a few years ago (1990s) when stricter legislation and the implementation of more efficient treatment mechanisms led to the decrease of emissions to minimal values. Other industrialized countries like Poland, where less strict legislation is applied, have not shown the same progression. |
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 444: | Line 444: | ||
<h2 class="w3">Severe contamination events of dioxins: </h2> | <h2 class="w3">Severe contamination events of dioxins: </h2> | ||
<h3 class="w3-center">Agent Orange and the American - Vietnam war</h3> | <h3 class="w3-center">Agent Orange and the American - Vietnam war</h3> | ||
− | <p style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;"> During the War between the US and Vietnam in the 1960’s, thousands of kilometers of land were heavily sprayed with an herbicide called Agent Orange, which was used to clear heavily forested areas. But TCDD was an unintended byproduct of Agent Orange production; thus, the military had unknowingly contaminated all of that land with this toxin. Even today, over 50 years after the event took place, the United States is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to reclaim that land. | + | <p style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;text-align:justify"> During the War between the US and Vietnam in the 1960’s, thousands of kilometers of land were heavily sprayed with an herbicide called Agent Orange, which was used to clear heavily forested areas. But TCDD was an unintended byproduct of Agent Orange production; thus, the military had unknowingly contaminated all of that land with this toxin. Even today, over 50 years after the event took place, the United States is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to reclaim that land. |
</p> | </p> | ||
<h3 class="w3-center"> Seveso disaster in Italy</h3> | <h3 class="w3-center"> Seveso disaster in Italy</h3> | ||
− | <p style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;"> An accident at a chemical factory in Seveso, Italy in 1976 resulted in the highest known exposure to TCDD in residential areas. A mixture of toxic chemicals, including TCDD, was released into the air, contaminating an area of about 15 km2 where over 37,000 people lived. Within days, over 3000 animals in the area, including livestock, had perished, with over 80,000 animals being put down in order to prevent the contamination from entering our food chain. In addition, nearly 500 residents received severe skin lesions. In studies on the long-term effects of exposure on the affected population, higher incidences of cancer, nerve damage, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, and impaired liver function were observed. This event gave rise to numerous scientific studies and standardized industrial safety regulations in Europe.</p> | + | <p style="padding-left:100px;padding-right:100px;text-align:justify"> An accident at a chemical factory in Seveso, Italy in 1976 resulted in the highest known exposure to TCDD in residential areas. A mixture of toxic chemicals, including TCDD, was released into the air, contaminating an area of about 15 km2 where over 37,000 people lived. Within days, over 3000 animals in the area, including livestock, had perished, with over 80,000 animals being put down in order to prevent the contamination from entering our food chain. In addition, nearly 500 residents received severe skin lesions. In studies on the long-term effects of exposure on the affected population, higher incidences of cancer, nerve damage, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, and impaired liver function were observed. This event gave rise to numerous scientific studies and standardized industrial safety regulations in Europe.</p> |
<h2 class="w3">References:</h2> | <h2 class="w3">References:</h2> |
Revision as of 20:12, 8 October 2018
Regulation and global aspects of the problem
Although the formation of dioxins occurs "locally", environmental distribution is global. Dioxins are found throughout the world in small amounts, including areas that are entirely uninhabited. The highest levels of these compounds are found in some soils, sediments and food, especially dairy products, meat, fish and shellfish. Lower levels are found in plants, water and air.