The Problem

For over a century, dioxins – and specifically chlorinated dioxins – have been notorious as some of the most toxic and persistent environmental pollutants. Though some dioxins occur naturally, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD), the most toxic chemical of this family, is entirely synthetic. These compounds are extremely stable and, due to their synthetic nature, many are not easily broken down by living organisms. Dioxins remain in our ecosystems for decades, transferring from soil to plant, to animal, and back to the soil again in an unending cycle.

The toxicity of TCDD is such that varying doses of the toxin had caused cancer in all animals tested¹. TCDD’s effect is widespread, reaching almost all of the internal organs, depending on the type of animal that is exposed. Birth defects, as well as severe developmental issues have been observed in humans as well as other animals². TCDD is more toxic than cyanide, ricin and even plutonium.

How is TCDD created?

TCDD is not, and has never been produced commercially except as a pure chemical for scientific research. It is, however, a byproduct of chlorophenols or chlorophenoxy acids which are produced as herbicides and fungicides. It may also be formed along with other polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDD’s) and dibenzofuranes (PCDF’s) during incineration, especially if certain metal catalysts such as copper are present³. Generally, small amounts of PCDD/Fs are formed whenever organic materials such as oxygen and chlorine are available at suitable temperatures. As a result of this, when organic material is burned in less-than-optimal conditions- open or building fires, domestic fireplaces, and poorly operated and designed solid waste incinerators- these chemicals are synthesized at the highest high rates. Historically, municipal and medical waste incineration was a central source of PCDD/Fs.

Other sources of PCDD/F include:
  ·Metal smelting and refining.
  ·Chlorine bleaching of pulp and paper - historically important source of PCDD/Fs to waterways.
  ·Synthesis side products of several chemicals, especially PCBs, chlorophenols, chlorophenoxy acid herbicides, and hexachlorophene.
  ·Uncontrolled combustion, particularly the open burning of waste ("backyard barrel burning"), accidental fires, wildfires.
  ·Engines using leaded fuel, which contained the additives 1,2-Dichloroethane and 1,2-Dibromoethane, (a practice no longer used).

Mode of action

TCDD and dioxin-like compounds act via a specific receptor⁴ present in all mammalian cells: the aryl hydrocarbon (AH) receptor. This receptor is a transcription factor which is involved in the expression of genes; in fact, it has been shown that high doses of TCDD affect the expression of several hundred genes in rats, increase some while decreasing others. Research shows a particularly strong effect on the transcription of enzymes activating the breakdown of foreign and toxic compounds.

Polycyclic hydrocarbons also activate the AH receptor, but less than TCDD and only temporarily. Even many natural compounds (present in certain vegetables, for instance) cause some activation of the AH receptor. This phenomenon can be viewed as adaptive and beneficial because it protects the organism from toxic and carcinogenic substances. Despite this, excessive and persistent stimulation of AH receptor leads to a number of adverse effects.

While the mutagenic and genotoxic effects of TCDD are sometimes disputed, it has been confirmed that it does foster the development of cancer⁵. Its main action in causing cancer is promoting the carcinogenicity initiated by other compounds. Very high doses may, in addition, cause cancer indirectly; one of the proposed mechanisms is oxidative stress and the subsequent oxygen damage to DNA. There are other explanations such as endocrine disruption or altered signal transduction.

We devoted ourselves to this issue because to date, the existing solutions are astoundingly impractical and inefficient. The solutions being employed address only local-scale pollution, and are not sustainable.

The biggest TCDD remediation project today is happening in Vietnam. During the American-Vietnam war in the 1960’s, tens of thousands of kilometers of land were heavily sprayed with an herbicide called Agent Orange. But TCDD was an unintended byproduct of Agent Orange production; thus, the military had unknowingly contaminated all of that land with this toxin. Today, over 50 years after the events took place, the United States is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to reclaim this land.

Today, soils in Vietnam are being decontaminated by transporting only the most heavily contaminated soils to a castle-sized, makeshift “oven”. Once there, the soil is incinerated 350°C for months. Although this method successfully rids soils of their dioxin contaminants it is impractical for a number of reasons.

1. Only so much soil can be gathered for purification.
2. The process is detrimental to the soil, damaging both microbial communities and soil structure.
3. This method is unsustainable, and cannot be used for large-scale pollution over large areas.

Additionally, is important to note that dioxin pollution is found in small amounts nearly everywhere in the world. Soil-burning would be far too inefficient and expensive to deal with these types of contaminations.