(Created page with "<html> <head> <style> body { height: 100%; width: 100%; background-color: transparent !important; } #globalWr...") |
|||
(18 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
padding: 0; | padding: 0; | ||
font-size: transparent !important; | font-size: transparent !important; | ||
+ | overflow-y: hidden; | ||
} | } | ||
Line 29: | Line 30: | ||
p:hover { | p:hover { | ||
border-style: transparent !important; | border-style: transparent !important; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | #HQ_page table { | ||
+ | margin: 0 !important; | ||
+ | border: none !important; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | #HQ_page th { | ||
+ | background-color: #BFBFBF !important; | ||
+ | padding: 0 !important; | ||
+ | border: none !important; | ||
+ | vertical-align: inherit !important; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | #HQ_page td{ | ||
+ | vertical-align: inherit !important; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | figcaption { | ||
+ | color: #131313; | ||
} | } | ||
</style> | </style> | ||
Line 51: | Line 72: | ||
.table-body { | .table-body { | ||
width: 100%; | width: 100%; | ||
+ | border: none; | ||
} | } | ||
Line 73: | Line 95: | ||
} | } | ||
</style> | </style> | ||
− | + | ||
<script type="text/x-mathjax-config"> | <script type="text/x-mathjax-config"> | ||
MathJax.Hub.Config({ | MathJax.Hub.Config({ | ||
Line 87: | Line 109: | ||
</head> | </head> | ||
− | <body | + | <body> |
− | + | <ul id="left-nav"> | |
<li> | <li> | ||
<a>PROJECT</a> | <a>PROJECT</a> | ||
Line 105: | Line 127: | ||
<li><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/ExperimentsFeedback">Feedback</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/ExperimentsFeedback">Feedback</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/ExperimentsOutput">Output</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/ExperimentsOutput">Output</a></li> | ||
− | <li><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/ | + | <li><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/Results">Results</a></li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
Line 113: | Line 135: | ||
<ul> | <ul> | ||
<li><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/Model">Overview</a></li> | <li><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/Model">Overview</a></li> | ||
− | <li><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/FluorescentProbesModel">Fluorescent | + | <li><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/FluorescentProbesModel">Fluorescent Probe Model </a></li> |
<li><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/H2O2DecompositionModel">H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> | <li><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/H2O2DecompositionModel">H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> | ||
Decomposition Model</a></li> | Decomposition Model</a></li> | ||
<li><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/roGFP2-Orp1MichaelisEquationModel">roGFP2-Orp1 | <li><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:BIT-China/roGFP2-Orp1MichaelisEquationModel">roGFP2-Orp1 | ||
− | Michaelis | + | Michaelis equation Model</a></li> |
</ul> | </ul> | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
Line 163: | Line 185: | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
− | |||
<a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:BIT-China"><img id="imgA" class="imgA-new-pos" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/46/T--BIT-China--iGEM2018-A_img.png" /></a> | <a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:BIT-China"><img id="imgA" class="imgA-new-pos" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/46/T--BIT-China--iGEM2018-A_img.png" /></a> | ||
<!-- end --> | <!-- end --> | ||
Line 173: | Line 194: | ||
<div id="MD-content-all" class="MD-content-container" style="margin-top:calc(25vh - 30px);"> | <div id="MD-content-all" class="MD-content-container" style="margin-top:calc(25vh - 30px);"> | ||
<div class="MD-title"> | <div class="MD-title"> | ||
− | <a style="border-bottom-style: solid;"> | + | <a style="border-bottom-style: solid;text-decoration: none;color: #131313;">roGFP2-Orp1 MICHAELIS EQUATION MODEL</a> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div id="MD1" class="cd-section MD-margin-title1ToUp"> | <div id="MD1" class="cd-section MD-margin-title1ToUp"> | ||
<div class="MD-title-1" style="border-left-style:solid;padding-left:10px;"> | <div class="MD-title-1" style="border-left-style:solid;padding-left:10px;"> | ||
− | <a>Purpose</a> | + | <a style="text-decoration: none;color: #131313;">Purpose</a> |
</div> | </div> | ||
<div class="MD-content MD-margin-toTitle1"> | <div class="MD-content MD-margin-toTitle1"> | ||
<p class="MD-content-p"> | <p class="MD-content-p"> | ||
− | In the previous model, we successfully obtained the relationship between intracellular | + | In the previous model, we successfully obtained the relationship between intracellular H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> |
− | concentration and extracellular | + | concentration and extracellular H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> concentration. Therefore, we were going |
− | relationship between intracellular | + | to establish the |
+ | relationship between intracellular H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> concentration and roGFP2-Orp1 in | ||
+ | order to evaluate the | ||
antioxidant function signal output of our entire system. | antioxidant function signal output of our entire system. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 193: | Line 216: | ||
<div id="MD2" class="cd-section"> | <div id="MD2" class="cd-section"> | ||
<div class="MD-title-1 MD-margin-title1ToUp" style="border-left-style:solid;padding-left:10px;"> | <div class="MD-title-1 MD-margin-title1ToUp" style="border-left-style:solid;padding-left:10px;"> | ||
− | <a>Model Hypothesis</a> | + | <a style="text-decoration: none;color: #131313;">Model Hypothesis</a> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 199: | Line 222: | ||
<p class="MD-content-p"> | <p class="MD-content-p"> | ||
1. The roGFP2-Orp1 is a fusion protein, and Orp1 is a catalase. Therefore, the reaction process of | 1. The roGFP2-Orp1 is a fusion protein, and Orp1 is a catalase. Therefore, the reaction process of | ||
− | the protein with | + | the protein with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> can be considered as a classical enzymatic reaction |
− | reaction is a | + | meaning that this |
+ | reaction is a roGFP2-Orp1 Michaelis equation Model, and the oxidation state of roGFP2 is one of the reaction products. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
<p class="MD-content-p MD-margin-toP"> | <p class="MD-content-p MD-margin-toP"> | ||
2. The total intracellular concentration of roGFP2 is constant. And roGFP2 has two states, | 2. The total intracellular concentration of roGFP2 is constant. And roGFP2 has two states, | ||
− | oxidative state and reductive state. And the | + | oxidative state and reductive state. And the intracellular protein concentration is depended on the |
transcription rate of promoter. | transcription rate of promoter. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 218: | Line 242: | ||
<div id="MD3" class="cd-section MD-margin-toP"> | <div id="MD3" class="cd-section MD-margin-toP"> | ||
<div class="MD-title-1 MD-margin-title1ToUp" style="border-left-style:solid;padding-left:10px;"> | <div class="MD-title-1 MD-margin-title1ToUp" style="border-left-style:solid;padding-left:10px;"> | ||
− | <a>Model analysis and construction</a> | + | <a style="text-decoration: none;color: #131313;">Model analysis and construction</a> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 224: | Line 248: | ||
<p class="MD-content-p"> | <p class="MD-content-p"> | ||
According to Hypothesis 1, we consider the reaction process of intracellular hydrogen peroxide with | According to Hypothesis 1, we consider the reaction process of intracellular hydrogen peroxide with | ||
− | roGFP2 as an enzymatic reaction process, which is consistent with the | + | roGFP2 as an enzymatic reaction process, which is consistent with the roGFP2-Orp1 Michaelis equation Model. |
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 251: | Line 275: | ||
is the number of oxidized roGFP2 molecules. Based on the assumption that the overall fluorescence | is the number of oxidized roGFP2 molecules. Based on the assumption that the overall fluorescence | ||
intensity is equal to the sum of the fluorescence intensities from the individual roGFP2 molecules, | intensity is equal to the sum of the fluorescence intensities from the individual roGFP2 molecules, | ||
− | the relationships were given in Table | + | the relationships were given in Table 1. |
</p> | </p> | ||
<p class="MD-content-p MD-margin-toP"> | <p class="MD-content-p MD-margin-toP"> | ||
− | Table | + | Table 1. Relationships Between Fluorescence Intensities and Probe Molecules |
</p> | </p> | ||
<div class="table-head"> | <div class="table-head"> | ||
Line 324: | Line 348: | ||
By substituting the resulting equations (right column of Table 3) into OxD<sub>roGFP2</sub>=N<sub>ox</sub>/N<sub>total</sub>, | By substituting the resulting equations (right column of Table 3) into OxD<sub>roGFP2</sub>=N<sub>ox</sub>/N<sub>total</sub>, | ||
the | the | ||
− | relationship between OxD<sub>roGFP2</sub> and the macroscopic observables can be deduced.( | + | relationship between OxD<sub>roGFP2</sub> and the macroscopic observables can be deduced.<sup |
+ | onmouseover="tooltip.pop(this, '#tip-1', {position:1, offsetX:-20, effect:'slide',hideDelay: 10})" | ||
+ | style="color:#38679a;">[1]</sup> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 354: | Line 380: | ||
the protein concentration was basically the same and according to the data provided in the previous | the protein concentration was basically the same and according to the data provided in the previous | ||
literature, it is known that in yeast cells, the Eno2 protein concentration is around 0.5 | literature, it is known that in yeast cells, the Eno2 protein concentration is around 0.5 | ||
− | mM.( | + | mM.<sup onmouseover="tooltip.pop(this, '#tip-2', {position:1, offsetX:-20, effect:'slide',hideDelay: 10})" |
+ | style="color:#38679a;">[2]</sup> | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
Line 366: | Line 393: | ||
<p class="MD-content-p MD-margin-toP"> | <p class="MD-content-p MD-margin-toP"> | ||
− | In order to obtain the two constants in the | + | In order to obtain the two constants in the Michealis equation, we measured the reaction rate of the |
reaction in yeast cells by applying different concentrations of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and | reaction in yeast cells by applying different concentrations of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and | ||
using the simulation | using the simulation | ||
Line 376: | Line 403: | ||
<figure class="MD-Fig MD-margin-toContentP"> | <figure class="MD-Fig MD-margin-toContentP"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/6c/T--BIT-China--iGEM2018-Modeling10.PNG"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/6/6c/T--BIT-China--iGEM2018-Modeling10.PNG"> | ||
− | <figcaption>Fig. | + | <figcaption>Fig.1 Fluorescence ratio measurement data from wet experiment</figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
<figure class="MD-Fig MD-margin-toContentP"> | <figure class="MD-Fig MD-margin-toContentP"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/e/e0/T--BIT-China--iGEM2018-Modeling11.PNG"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/e/e0/T--BIT-China--iGEM2018-Modeling11.PNG"> | ||
− | <figcaption>Fig. | + | <figcaption>Fig.2 Reaction rate measurement data from wet experiment</figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
Line 390: | Line 417: | ||
<figure class="MD-Fig MD-margin-toContentP"> | <figure class="MD-Fig MD-margin-toContentP"> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/5c/T--BIT-China--iGEM2018-Modeling12.PNG"> | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/5c/T--BIT-China--iGEM2018-Modeling12.PNG"> | ||
− | <figcaption>Fig. | + | <figcaption>Fig.3 v<sub>max</sub> and K<sub>m</sub> calculation using double reciprocal mapping</figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
Line 410: | Line 437: | ||
<div id="MD4" class="cd-section MD-margin-toP"> | <div id="MD4" class="cd-section MD-margin-toP"> | ||
<div class="MD-title-1" style="border-left-style:solid;padding-left:10px;"> | <div class="MD-title-1" style="border-left-style:solid;padding-left:10px;"> | ||
− | <a>Summary</a> | + | <a style="text-decoration: none;color: #131313;">Summary</a> |
</div> | </div> | ||
Line 417: | Line 444: | ||
can change | can change | ||
the spectral properties of our system's roGFP2, and successfully convert our selected ROS signal | the spectral properties of our system's roGFP2, and successfully convert our selected ROS signal | ||
− | ( | + | (Intracellular H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> concentration) into a visualized fluorescent signal that |
means we can evaluate the | means we can evaluate the | ||
− | + | intracellular H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> concentration easily through calculate the OxD value. | |
However, due to time and experimental limitation, our model is only a preliminary establishment, and | However, due to time and experimental limitation, our model is only a preliminary establishment, and | ||
its subsequent calibration work is limited by experiment and time, there is no enough time to continue | its subsequent calibration work is limited by experiment and time, there is no enough time to continue | ||
Line 456: | Line 483: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
<!-- end --> | <!-- end --> | ||
+ | <div style="display:none;font-family: 'helveticaregular';"> | ||
+ | <div id="tip-1"> | ||
+ | <div class="column" style="width:230px;height: 100px;"> | ||
+ | <a>Morgan B, Sobotta M C, Dick T P. Measuring EGSH and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> with roGFP2-based | ||
+ | redox probes[J]. Free Radical Biology & Medicine, 2011, 51(11):1943-1951. | ||
+ | </a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <div id="tip-2"> | ||
+ | <div class="column" style="width:230px;height: 100px;"> | ||
+ | <a>Carroll KM, Simpson DM, Eyers CE, Knight CG, Brownridge P, Dunn WB, Winder CL, Lanthaler K, Pir P, | ||
+ | Malys N, Kell DB, Oliver SG, Gaskell SJ, Beynon RJ. Absolute quantification of the glycolytic | ||
+ | pathway in yeast: deployment of a complete QconCAT approach. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Dec10(12): | ||
+ | M111.007633. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.007633. Supplementary table V rows "E"-"P" | ||
+ | </a> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
<script src="https://2018.igem.org/Template:BIT-China/js/jquery-min?action=raw&ctype=text/javascript"></script> | <script src="https://2018.igem.org/Template:BIT-China/js/jquery-min?action=raw&ctype=text/javascript"></script> | ||
<script src="https://2018.igem.org/Template:BIT-China/js/copy-tendina?action=raw&ctype=text/javascript"></script> | <script src="https://2018.igem.org/Template:BIT-China/js/copy-tendina?action=raw&ctype=text/javascript"></script> |
Latest revision as of 00:46, 18 October 2018
In the previous model, we successfully obtained the relationship between intracellular H2O2 concentration and extracellular H2O2 concentration. Therefore, we were going to establish the relationship between intracellular H2O2 concentration and roGFP2-Orp1 in order to evaluate the antioxidant function signal output of our entire system.
1. The roGFP2-Orp1 is a fusion protein, and Orp1 is a catalase. Therefore, the reaction process of the protein with H2O2 can be considered as a classical enzymatic reaction meaning that this reaction is a roGFP2-Orp1 Michaelis equation Model, and the oxidation state of roGFP2 is one of the reaction products.
2. The total intracellular concentration of roGFP2 is constant. And roGFP2 has two states, oxidative state and reductive state. And the intracellular protein concentration is depended on the transcription rate of promoter.
3. The two absorption peak values of roGFP2 at 405 nm and 488 nm are linear with the protein concentration in two states.
According to Hypothesis 1, we consider the reaction process of intracellular hydrogen peroxide with roGFP2 as an enzymatic reaction process, which is consistent with the roGFP2-Orp1 Michaelis equation Model.
$$V=\frac{v_{max}[H_{2}O_{2}]}{K_{m}+[H_{2}O_{2}]}$$
Here we define a new parameter OxDroGFP2 to reflect the degree of oxidation of roGFP2. Meanwhile, facilitate subsequent calculations.
$$OxD_{roGFP2}=\frac{[roGFP2_{ox}]}{[roGFP2_{ox}]+[roGFP2_{red}]}$$
According to Hypothesis 3, we can correlate the redox state of roGFP2 with the fluorescence value measured by the macroscopic observables easily. To establish this relationship, several molecular quantities followed need to be defined. i405red, i405ox, i488red, and i488ox are the fluorescence intensities contributed by a single roGFP2 molecule at the indicated wavelength and redox state. Ntotal is the total number of roGFP2 molecules. Nred is the number of reduced roGFP2 molecules. Nox is the number of oxidized roGFP2 molecules. Based on the assumption that the overall fluorescence intensity is equal to the sum of the fluorescence intensities from the individual roGFP2 molecules, the relationships were given in Table 1.
Table 1. Relationships Between Fluorescence Intensities and Probe Molecules
Condition | Formula |
---|
Limiting condition 1: | Ntotal = Nred | I405red = Ntotal · i405red |
Complete reduction | Nox = 0 | I488red = Ntotal · i488red |
Limiting condition 2: | Ntotal = Nox | I405ox = Ntotal · i405ox |
Complete oxidation | Nred = 0 | I488ox = Ntotal · i488ox |
Actual measurement | Ntotal = Nred + Nox | I405 = Nox · i405ox + Nred · i405red |
I488 = Nox · i488ox + Nred · i488red |
By substituting the resulting equations (right column of Table 3) into OxDroGFP2=Nox/Ntotal, the relationship between OxDroGFP2 and the macroscopic observables can be deduced.[1]
$$oxD_{roGFP2}=\frac{I405\cdot I488_{red}-I405_{red}\cdot I488}{I405\cdot I488_{red}-I405\cdot I488_{ox}+I405_{ox}\cdot I488-I405_{red}\cdot I488}$$
After the above relationship is completed, since the absolute protein concentration determination is difficult, we define the relative reaction rate as
$$V^{'}=\frac{V}{[roGFP2_{ox}]+[roGFP2_{red}]}$$
$$OxD_{roGFP2}=\frac{[roGFP2_{ox}]}{[roGFP2_{ox}]+[roGFP2_{red}]}$$
$$V^{'}=\frac{OxD^{'}-OxD}{t^{'}-t}$$
At the same time, according to Hypothesis 2, roGFP2total is constant, but the protein concentration could not be measured by us. So we thought that under the same promoter conditions, the protein concentration was basically the same and according to the data provided in the previous literature, it is known that in yeast cells, the Eno2 protein concentration is around 0.5 mM.[2]
So we could get:
$$[roGFP2_{total}]=0.5\ mM$$
In order to obtain the two constants in the Michealis equation, we measured the reaction rate of the reaction in yeast cells by applying different concentrations of H2O2 and using the simulation results of the H2O2 Decomposition Model in combination with the function of roGFP2. The results were as follows:
Calculate two constants by double reciprocal mapping.
$$v_{max}=0.015207$$
$$K_{m}=0.451642$$
The relationship between the change in fluorescence intensity of roGFP2 and the concentration of intracellular H2O2 is set up successfully.
Our model has been successfully implemented. Different concentrations of intracellular H2O2 can change the spectral properties of our system's roGFP2, and successfully convert our selected ROS signal (Intracellular H2O2 concentration) into a visualized fluorescent signal that means we can evaluate the intracellular H2O2 concentration easily through calculate the OxD value. However, due to time and experimental limitation, our model is only a preliminary establishment, and its subsequent calibration work is limited by experiment and time, there is no enough time to continue optimization .We also hoped that there will be follow-up teams to continue to finish our models.