Difference between revisions of "Team:Queens Canada/Market"

Line 220: Line 220:
 
         <h4>Use in diagnostic procedures in clinical settings.</h4>
 
         <h4>Use in diagnostic procedures in clinical settings.</h4>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
   <div class="container right" style="background-color:#44D9E6;">
+
   <div class="container right">
    <div class="content">
+
    <div class="content" style="background-color:#44D9E6;">
 
       <p>Instant results would reduce wait time in the ER. <br><br> Little training required to operate.</p>
 
       <p>Instant results would reduce wait time in the ER. <br><br> Little training required to operate.</p>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>

Revision as of 23:58, 8 August 2018

Market Direction Analysis

Use by parents to monitor child’s stress levels and general well-being

Useful in the early detection of illness & Prevention of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome

Will lead to more anxiety on the parental end

Use by adults for quantitative self care

Difficulty in differentiating between what is normal and what is a cause of concern.

Insurance privacy concerns

Monitoring device for non-verbal/individuals with developmental disabilities

Would allow for better understanding by the parents/ caretaker to what things may trigger the child.

May be rejected due to the sensory sensitivity of the patient to the design of the product.

Use in research studies

Non-disruptive method of salivary collection, would not induce fluctuation in bio-marker.

Would need a variety of designs to acomodate different studies and populations.

Use in monitoring treatment in clinical settings

Instant and ongoing surveillance.

Help to determine personalized treatment plan and dosage.

Use in diagnostic procedures in clinical settings.

Instant results would reduce wait time in the ER.

Little training required to operate.

Pros

Some text..

Cons

Some text..

Point of Care device for clinicians and tool for researchers