Difference between revisions of "Team:UESTC-China/Demonstrate"

Revision as of 10:32, 17 October 2018

team

Demonstrate

1. Pathway construction

For efficient expression of multiple enzymes in E. coli, codon optimization of all target genes was performed before DNA synthesis. The obtained genes were subsequently cloned into different expression vectors by using Gibson Assembly and Golden Gate strategies. The resulting vectors piGEM2018-Module001, piGEM2018-Module002, and piGEM2018-Module003 are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Illustration of the three constructed vectors.

No.	Vector	E. coli resistance	Description
1	piGEM2018-Module001	Amp	BBa_J23100-RBS-pelB+5D-Xyn10D-fae1A-RBS-pelB+5D-Xyl3A-RBS-pelB+5D-Cex-RBS-pelB+5D-CenA-Ter
2	piGEM2018-Module002	Kan	Ter-Ter-RBS-Fdh-RBS-FRE_adhE-FRE_ackA-RBS-AtoB-RBS-AdhE2-RBS-Crt-RBS-Hbd-Ter
3	piGEM2018-Module003	Kan	BBa_J23100-RBS-FhlA-RBS-HydA-Ter

Before DNA sequencing, those vectors were verified by restriction enzyme digestion. After electrophoresis analysis, the samples which contained the desired bands were selected and sent for sequencing. The sequencing results showed that all the above constructed vectors were successful. (Fig. 1)

Fig.1 Double restriction enzyme digestion of three constructed vectors analyzed by using agarose gel electrophoresis.

(a) piGEM2018-Module001 digested by Eco32Ⅰ+NcoⅠ(lane 1), piGEM2018-Module001 digested by NcoⅠ+XhoⅠ(lane 2);

(b) piGEM2018-Module002 digested by PstⅠ+KpnⅠ(lane 1), piGEM2018-Module002 digested by HindⅢ+KpnⅠ(lane 2);

(c) piGEM2018-Module003 digested by EcoRⅠ+NcoⅠ(lane 1), piGEM2018-Module003 digested by BamHⅠ+BglⅡ(lane 2);

2. From straw to glucose

E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying piGEM2018-Module001 was used to degrade straw to glucose. Three extracellular expressed enzymes ferulic acid esterase, xylanase and cellulase are involved in the pathway. The expression of the three target protein were verified by enzyme activity using fermentation liquid and enzyme crude extract, respectively (Fig. 2). The results showed that the activities of all three enzymes in fermentation liquid fraction are too low to be detected, which could be due to the fact of low enzyme concentration. We also determined the enzyme activity using enzyme crude extract. The enzyme activity in crude fraction obtained from the strain carrying piGEM2018-Module001 was higher than that without the corresponding vector for all enzymes.

Fig.2 Enzyme activity detection using crude extract fraction of strain with or without. Module001：All sample were collected after fermentation for 24 h. (a) The activity of xylanase. U/ml definition: 1 ml of enzyme solution (at 40 °C pH = 6.0) 1 h decomposition of xylan to produce 1 mg xylose, regarded as an enzyme unit [1]; (b) The activity of ferulic acid esterase. U/ml definition: The amount of enzyme (at 40 °C pH = 6.4) required to degrade 1 μmol of 4-nitrophenyl trans-ferulate per minute is one Unit of ferulic acid esterase activity [2]; (c) The activity of total cellulase. U/ml definition: 1 ml of enzyme solution (at 40 °C pH = 7.0) hydrolyzed the filter paper per minute to produce 1.0 μmol of glucose, which is one Unit of total cellulase activity [3]; (d) The activity of endoglucanase. U/ml definition: 1 ml of enzyme solution (at 40 ° C pH = 7.0) hydrolyzed CMC-Na per minute to produce 1.0 umol of glucose, which is one Unit of endoglucanase activity [4].

In order to further evaluate the extracellular expression of ferulic acid esterase, xylanase and cellulose, the formation of the corresponding intermediates were determined. GC-MS was used to detect ferulic acid. The ferulic acid production was monitored by periodically taking samples from the fermentation liquid of E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying piGEM2018-Module001. Carvacrol was used as an internal standard for GC measurements [5]. GC results showed that the peak of ferulic acid was appeared after fermentation for 24h with the strain carrying piGEM2018-Module001, while no ferulic acid was detected in the sample of E. coli BL21(DE3) without vector (Fig. 3). The ferulic acid peak was further analyzed by using GC-MS (Fig. 4).

Fig.3 The production of ferulic acid determined using GC.The supernatants of fermented liquid of E. coli BL21(DE3) with or without piGEM2018-Module001were used for the determination of ferulic acid, respectively. Samples were taken from reaction mixtureat 0h, 24h.

Fig.4 Mass spectrums of ferulic acid derivative. Sample was the supernatants of E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying piGEM2018-Module001after fermentation for 24h.

The activity of cellulase was determined by using Congo Red assay [6]. As shown in Fig.5, the strains carrying piGEM2018-Module001 displayed a zone of clearance. Such a zone of clearance was also observed in the positive control carried out by using commercial cellulose, while no zone of clearance was observed with same E. coli strain carrying empty vector. The results indicated that cellulose was successfully extracellularly expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) with piGEM2018-Module001.

Fig.5 Activity determination of cellulase using Congo Red assay. (a) CMC agar plate before staining with Congo Red. (b)CMC agar plate after staining with Congo Red. Module001: BL21(DE3) carrying piGEM2018-Module001（OD600: 1, 3, 5 from left to right); Positive Control: commercial cellulose (Enzyme concentration: 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 mg/ml from left to right); Negative Control: BL21 (DE3) carrying empty vector (OD600: 1, 3, 5 from left to right)
3. Butanol production

E. coli BL21(DE3) carrying piGEM2018-Module002 was used to convert glucose to butanol. Five enzymes AtoB, Hbd, crt, ter and adhE2 are involved in the pathway, which was validated by monitoring the production of butanol using GC. To test whether this multi-enzyme conversion system could work in our E. coli successfully or not, we detected the production curve of butanol.

The butanol production was determined by periodically taking samples from the supernatant of fermented liquid of BL21(DE3). Isobutanol was used as an internal standard [7]. The results showed that the peak of butanol was appeared after fermentation for 24h with the strain carrying piGEM2018-Module002, while no butanol peak was observed for the negative control (E. coli BL23(DE3) with empty vector(Fig.6).

Fig.6 The production of butanol determined using GC. The supernatants of fermented liquid of E. coli BL21(DE3) with or without piGEM2018-Module002 were used for the determination of butanol, respectively. For anaerobic growth, precultures were adjusted to OD600 10 with 2 mL of fresh medium with 50mg/L kanamycin. The culture was transferred to a sealed 10ml vacuum tube. Cultures were shaken (200 rpm) at 37 °C for 24 h. Then samples were taken from reaction mixture at 0h, 24h.

To improve butanol production, the fermentation conditions were optimized by using orthogonal array design by designing 17 three factor analysis. After a serious of butanol-production detection under different cultivating condition, we finally provided the necessary data for modeling. Then detecting the butanol production in 24h under the optimized conditions. (Fig. 7)And the final maximum yield of butanol is 0.406 g / L in 26 hours.

Fig.7 The butanol production curve at optimized conditions (temperature=34℃, initial OD=13, Initial pH=8)
4. Hydrogen production

To verify whether the piGEM-Module003 plasmid was working normally in E. coli DH5α, we set up an anaerobic fermentation unit. The produced gases flow through the following setup to remove carbon dioxide as much as possible to get hydrogen.

Fig.8 Picture of hydrogen-collecting device.

The collected gas is qualitatively detected by combustion test. As seen from Video 1, one can clearly hear the sound of boom, while no similar phenomenon was observed for the control group.

Video 1. The video of gas combustion test. Samples were collected from the engineered E. coli DH5α carrying the plasmid piGEM2018-Module003 and wild type plasmid after shaking 48h in TB medium.

Next, we used gas collection devices to quantitatively detect hydrogen production. The recombinant strain and the original DH5α strain were fermented continuously for 36 hours in a 200 ml 1% (W/V) glucose M9 medium. Fig.9 illustrates that our E. coli DH5α with piGEM2018-Module003 has higher hydrogen production than the original strain. At the same time, the hydrogen production of the recombinant bacteria increased exponentially with time (0-36h). Up to the end of fermentation, the yield of recombinant bacteria was 2.17mL/hr, which was 2.4 times higher than that of the original strain.

Fig.9 A diagram of the volume of hydrogen generated over time in a gas collection device. Recombinant strain and original strain were fermented in 200 ml 1% (W/V) glucose M9 medium.

Apart from the experiments, here we also carried out some theoretical modeling to provide some guidance to optimize the experimental condition. As demonstrated as following, 1mol glucose can produce 2 mol hydrogen from the theoretical point of view [8]. In order to explore the optimal conditions for hydrogen production from E. coli DH5α with piGEM 2018-Module 003 more efficiently, we used vacuum vascularization (10mL) with 1mL 1% (w/v) glucose M9 medium and 100 microliters of recombinant bacteria growing to logarithmic metaphase to ferment under different conditions. Next, we measured the amount of hydrogen and formation rate following the 40hr anaerobic fermentation. The results showed that under the condition of 30°C, 1.13% (W/V), pH=6.8, our recombinant strain has the highest hydrogen production. Based on this, we compare the hydrogen production between us and the literature. The results are as follows.(Fig.10)

Fig.10 Comparing the production of hydrogen between our result and other references.

Fig.10 shows that our E. coli DH5α with piGEM 2018-Module 003 hydrogen production is higher than most of the knockout and overexpression methods for E. coli's own genes, but there is still a gap compared with the methods for cloning some heterologous genes into E. coli.
5. Validation of integrated pathway

What we aim at is combing straw degradation with butanol production. Therefore, after Co-transformation piGEM2018-Module001 with piGEM2018-Module002, we get our super E. coli and cultivate it with straw and then transform it into anaerobic conditions. Using GC-MS to detect our production. We successfully detect the ferulic acid derivative and butanol (Fig. 11).

Fig.11 Mass spectrums of ferulic acid derivative and butanol. Sample was transgenic E. coli carrying piGEM2018-Module001 and piGEM2018-Module002, then taken from reaction mixture after 72h. 24h in aerobic condition and 28h in anaerobic condition.
6. Work going on

Import suicide gene

We plan to apply super E. coli to real life in the future, and for this purpose we should take full account of biosafety and maneuverability. Like the design of TU_Darmstadt in 2014 iGEM project, we transferred hokD gene into our cells [12].

Fig.12 Photograph obtained by phase contrast microscopy of cells from the hok induction experiments. Arrows point at cells with a clearly changed morphology. Cells with a normal morphology are also seen.

Import resistance gene

GroESL, which is a combination of GroEL and GroES gene has been shown to increase butanol production in E. coli [13]. We have test the tolerance of E. coli BW25113 with GroESL gene and original BW25113 under the condition of 1% (v/V) butanol concentration. The result shows that GroESL has a positive effect on the butanol tolerance of E. coli. In the future, we will use E. coli BW25113 combining piGEM2018-Module002 with GroESL gene to produce butanol.

Fig.12 After adding 0.3ml butanol in 30ml LB medium, the measurement of optical density (OD600) deference between DH5α with GroESL and Negative Control in 24 hour.

Knock out relevant gene

Due to limitations of experimental conditions, we are not able to knock out competitive pathway. However, many by-products will produce in the process of butanol production, namely frdABCD for succinate, ldhA for lactate, pta-ack for acetate, and adhE for ethanol (Fig.13)[14]. If we could knock out these competitive pathway, then our butanol production will be greatly improved.

Fig.13 E. coli self-metabolic pathway
7. References

[1] Shen C, Li R, Hu T & Yan K. 2011. Determination of xylanase activity with DNS method. Dyeing & Finishing, 2: 35-39.

[2] Zhang S, Pei X & Wu Z. 2009. Cloning and expression of feruloyl esterase A from Aspergillus niger, and establishment of fast activity detection methods. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2: 276-279.

[3] Luciano Silveira MH, Rau M, Pinto da Silva Bon E & Andreaus J. 2012. A simple and fast method for the determination of endo- and exo-cellulase activity in cellulase preparations using filter paper. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 51: 280-285.

[4] Wood TM & Bhat KM. 1988. Methods for measuring cellulase activities. Methods in Enzymology, 160: 87-112.

[5] Qiu-Yi, L. I., Gan, G. P., Wang, G. Z., & Liu, Y. W. (2007). Determination of ferulic acid in ligusticum chuanxiong hort. oil by gc. Lishizhen Medicine & Materia Medica Research.

[6] Lakhundi, S. S. (2012). Synthetic biology approach to cellulose degradation.

[7] Atsumi, S., Cann, A. F., Connor, M. R., Shen, C. R., Smith, K. M., Brynildsen, M. P., ... & Liao, J. C. (2008). Metabolic engineering of E. coli for 1-butanol production. Metabolic engineering, 10(6), 305-311.

[8] Hallenbeck PC & Ghosh D. 2012. Improvements in fermentative biological hydrogen production through metabolic engineering. Journal of Environmental Management, 95: 360-364.

[9] Yoshida A, Nishimura T, Kawaguchi H, Inui M, Yukawa H. 2006a. Enhanced hydrogen production from glucose using ldh- and frd-inactivated Escherichia coli strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 73: 67-72

[10] Akhtar MK, Jones PR. 2009. Construction of a synthetic YdbK-dependent pyruvate:H2 pathway in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) Metab. Eng. 11: 139-147

[11] Chittibabu, G., Nath, K., & Das, D. (2006). Feasibility studies on the fermentative hydrogen production by recombinant escherichia coli, bl-21. Process Biochemistry, 41(3), 682-688.

[12] Gerdes, K., et al. 1986. Mechanism of postsegregational killing by the hok gene product of the parB system of plasmid R1 and its homology with the relF gene product of the E. coli relB operon. Embo j, 1986. 5(8): p. 2023-9.

[13] Abdelaal, A. S., Ageez, A. M., El, A. E. H. A. A., & Abdallah, N. A. (2015). Genetic improvement of n-butanol tolerance in Escherichia coli by heterologous overexpression of groESL operon from Clostridium acetobutylicum. 3 Biotech, 5(4), 401-410.

[14] Shen, C. R., & Liao, J. C. (2008). Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for 1-butanol and 1-propanol production via the keto-acid pathways. Metabolic engineering, 10(6), 312-320.

@@ Line 355: / Line 355: @@
          <div class="chatu" style="padding:20px 10%;"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/4/43/T--UESTC-China--dem10.png" width="100%"></div>
          <div class="tu">
-             Fig.9  A diagram of the volume of hydrogen generated over time in a gas collection device. Recombinant strain and original strain were fermented in 200 ml 1% (w/v) glucose M9 medium.
+             Fig.9  A diagram of the volume of hydrogen generated over time in a gas collection device. Recombinant strain and original strain were fermented in 200 ml 1% (W/V) glucose M9 medium.
          </div>
          <div class="zhengwen">