Line 210: | Line 210: | ||
<h3>2.1 Determine the activity of the promoters | <h3>2.1 Determine the activity of the promoters | ||
<h4>To improve the selectivity of our therapy system, we utilize hTERT, the cancer-specific promoter, and HULC, the HCC-specific promoter, to open an AND-gated system to target HCC. pGL3-Basic vector is a promoterless vector for measuring the activity of promoter with a luciferase assay. We determined the activity of the two promoters by it. | <h4>To improve the selectivity of our therapy system, we utilize hTERT, the cancer-specific promoter, and HULC, the HCC-specific promoter, to open an AND-gated system to target HCC. pGL3-Basic vector is a promoterless vector for measuring the activity of promoter with a luciferase assay. We determined the activity of the two promoters by it. | ||
− | <center><image style="width: | + | <center><image style="width:40% !important" src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/3/31/T--CPU_CHINA--hp-demonstrate4.png></image></center> |
<h5><center>Figure1. The activity of the promoters</center></h5> | <h5><center>Figure1. The activity of the promoters</center></h5> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 217: | Line 217: | ||
<h3>2.2 Function verifiction of NS5B | <h3>2.2 Function verifiction of NS5B | ||
<h4>We applied indirect immunofluorescence to prove the expression (Figure2 A) and nuclear translocation (Figure2 B) of NS5B<sup>NLS</sup>. | <h4>We applied indirect immunofluorescence to prove the expression (Figure2 A) and nuclear translocation (Figure2 B) of NS5B<sup>NLS</sup>. | ||
− | <center><image style="width: | + | <center><image style="width:40% !important" src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/1/1e/T--CPU_CHINA--hp-demonstrate5.png></image></center> |
− | <h5><center>Figure2. The expression and nuclear translocation of | + | <h5><center>Figure2. The expression and nuclear translocation of NS5B<sup>NLS</sup></center></h5> |
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 224: | Line 224: | ||
<h3>2.3 Conditional RNA interference | <h3>2.3 Conditional RNA interference | ||
<h4>To test the kill ability of this conditional RNA interference system, MTT assay was involved. The effect was obvious when introduced two plasmids to the cells under the control of Tetracycline (Tc) (Figure3 A). | <h4>To test the kill ability of this conditional RNA interference system, MTT assay was involved. The effect was obvious when introduced two plasmids to the cells under the control of Tetracycline (Tc) (Figure3 A). | ||
− | <center><image style="width: | + | <center><image style="width:40% !important" src=https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/0/01/T--CPU_CHINA--hp-demonstrate6.png></image></center> |
<h5><center>Figure3. MTT Assay</center></h5> | <h5><center>Figure3. MTT Assay</center></h5> | ||
<h4>To analysis the quantity of miRNA and its silencing effect to MAP4K4 mRNA, Real-time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (QPCR) was preformed. When the inhibitory strand worked, the expression of miRNA(MAP4K4) was reduced (Figure4 A) and MAP4K4 mRNA was increased (Figure4 B). As expected, when the two plasmids worked, MAP4K4 mRNA was increased (Figure4 B) because sponge could absorb the miRNA(MAP4K4). | <h4>To analysis the quantity of miRNA and its silencing effect to MAP4K4 mRNA, Real-time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (QPCR) was preformed. When the inhibitory strand worked, the expression of miRNA(MAP4K4) was reduced (Figure4 A) and MAP4K4 mRNA was increased (Figure4 B). As expected, when the two plasmids worked, MAP4K4 mRNA was increased (Figure4 B) because sponge could absorb the miRNA(MAP4K4). |
Revision as of 03:01, 18 October 2018
I am promoter hTERT! Click me!
I am promoter Hulc! Click me!