Difference between revisions of "Team:Queens Canada/Market"
| Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
position: relative;border: 20px double #0485BF; | position: relative;border: 20px double #0485BF; | ||
border-radius: 15px; | border-radius: 15px; | ||
| − | height: | + | height: 400px; |
display: block; | display: block; | ||
margin-left: auto; | margin-left: auto; | ||
margin-right: auto; | margin-right: auto; | ||
| − | width: | + | width: 75%; |
} | } | ||
Revision as of 23:38, 8 August 2018
Market Direction Analysis
Use by parents to monitor child’s stress levels and general well-being
Useful in the early detection of illness & Prevention of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
Will lead to more anxiety on the parental end
Use by adults for quantitative self care
Difficulty in differentiating between what is normal and what is a cause of concern.
Insurance privacy concerns
Monitoring device for non-verbal/individuals with developmental disabilities
Would allow for better understanding by the parents/ caretaker to what things may trigger the child.
May be rejected due to the sensory sensitivity of the patient to the design of the product.
Use in research studies
Non-disruptive method of salivary collection, would not induce fluctuation in bio-marker.
Would need a variety of designs to acomodate different studies and populations.
Use in monitoring treatment in clinical settings
Instant and ongoing surveillance.
Help to determine personalized treatment plan and dosage.
Use in diagnostic procedures in clinical settings.
Instant results would reduce wait time in the ER.
Little training required to operate.
Heading 5
Text.
Heading 6
Text.
Heading 6
Text.
Pros
Some text..
Cons
Some text..