Difference between revisions of "Team:Newcastle/Medals"

Line 46: Line 46:
 
         <tr>
 
         <tr>
 
           <td class="medal bronze">2</td>
 
           <td class="medal bronze">2</td>
           <td>deliverables </td>
+
           <td>Deliverables </td>
 
           <td>A team wiki, poster, presentation and project attributions were made. The safety form, judging form and registry pages were completed.</td>
 
           <td>A team wiki, poster, presentation and project attributions were made. The safety form, judging form and registry pages were completed.</td>
 
         </tr>
 
         </tr>
Line 57: Line 57:
 
         <tr>
 
         <tr>
 
           <td class="medal bronze">4</td>
 
           <td class="medal bronze">4</td>
           <td>characteris/Contribution</td>
+
           <td>Characteris/Contribution</td>
 
           <td>Part of our team is made up of master students who have contributed to the interlab measurement study. The data can be found here</td>
 
           <td>Part of our team is made up of master students who have contributed to the interlab measurement study. The data can be found here</td>
 
         </tr>
 
         </tr>
Line 74: Line 74:
 
         <tr>
 
         <tr>
 
           <td class="medal silver">2</td>
 
           <td class="medal silver">2</td>
           <td>collaboration</td>
+
           <td>Collaboration</td>
 
           <td>Exeter have asked us to produce a kill curve through the open trons. For Sorbonne university one of our architectures provided them with a visualisation of their concept. Warwick was our third collaboration, we sent their team water samples. These Collaborations are detailed <body link="blue"><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Newcastle/Collaborations">here.</a></p></body></td>
 
           <td>Exeter have asked us to produce a kill curve through the open trons. For Sorbonne university one of our architectures provided them with a visualisation of their concept. Warwick was our third collaboration, we sent their team water samples. These Collaborations are detailed <body link="blue"><a href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:Newcastle/Collaborations">here.</a></p></body></td>
 
         </tr>
 
         </tr>
 
         <tr>
 
         <tr>
 
           <td class="medal silver">3</td>
 
           <td class="medal silver">3</td>
           <td>human practices</td>
+
           <td>Human Practices</td>
           <td> We contextualised our Human Practises (link) within the Newcastle City Council plan to make Newcastle into a 'Smart City.' We have proposed an additional scenario to those already outlined, one concerning sustainable agriculture; an urban farm inside the Victoria Tunnel which runs underneath the city. This conceptual design project forced us to think carefully about the safety(link) regarding GMOs when used in contained environments.  
+
           <td> We contextualised our Human Practices (link) within the Newcastle City Council plan to make Newcastle into a 'Smart City.' We have proposed an additional scenario to those already outlined, one concerning sustainable agriculture; an urban farm inside the Victoria Tunnel which runs underneath the city. This conceptual design project forced us to think carefully about the safety(link) regarding GMOs when used in contained environments. Before designing the urban farm, we spoke to: local farmers, several commercial urban farms, a social food enterprise and a research director. We used this design exercise to bring together all that we learned from our comprehensive stakeholder engagement(link). </td>
 
+
Before designing the urban farm, we spoke to: local farmers, several commercial urban farms, a social food enterprise and a research director. We used this design exercise to bring together all that we learned from our comprehensive stakeholder engagement(link). </td>
+
 
         </tr>
 
         </tr>
 
         <tr>
 
         <tr>
Line 92: Line 90:
 
           <td class="medal gold">1</td>
 
           <td class="medal gold">1</td>
 
           <td>Integrated Human Practices</td>
 
           <td>Integrated Human Practices</td>
           <td></td>
+
           <td> This design exercise outlined in the silver criteria integrates / was informed by all elements of our project: stakeholder engagement, wetware, hardware, and safety. Once we had consulted the relevant stakeholders (link) and felt we had sufficient information we began to feed this in to the design and execution of the project. We have document on our wiki how our project has been influenced by our human practices work.
 +
 
 +
See our human practices journey here (link). </td>
 
         </tr>
 
         </tr>
 
         <tr>
 
         <tr>

Revision as of 20:16, 4 October 2018

Menu
Alternative Roots/Protocols

Newcastle iGEM 2018

Medal Requirements

Medal Criteria Explanation
Bronze
1 Register and Attend Alternative roots (NCL team 2018) has registered and will be attending Giant Jamboree Boston
2 Deliverables A team wiki, poster, presentation and project attributions were made. The safety form, judging form and registry pages were completed.
3 Attributions The attributions can be found here.

4 Characteris/Contribution Part of our team is made up of master students who have contributed to the interlab measurement study. The data can be found here
Silver
1 Validated Part/ contribution
2 Collaboration Exeter have asked us to produce a kill curve through the open trons. For Sorbonne university one of our architectures provided them with a visualisation of their concept. Warwick was our third collaboration, we sent their team water samples. These Collaborations are detailed here.

3 Human Practices We contextualised our Human Practices (link) within the Newcastle City Council plan to make Newcastle into a 'Smart City.' We have proposed an additional scenario to those already outlined, one concerning sustainable agriculture; an urban farm inside the Victoria Tunnel which runs underneath the city. This conceptual design project forced us to think carefully about the safety(link) regarding GMOs when used in contained environments. Before designing the urban farm, we spoke to: local farmers, several commercial urban farms, a social food enterprise and a research director. We used this design exercise to bring together all that we learned from our comprehensive stakeholder engagement(link).
Gold
1 Integrated Human Practices This design exercise outlined in the silver criteria integrates / was informed by all elements of our project: stakeholder engagement, wetware, hardware, and safety. Once we had consulted the relevant stakeholders (link) and felt we had sufficient information we began to feed this in to the design and execution of the project. We have document on our wiki how our project has been influenced by our human practices work. See our human practices journey here (link).
2 Improve a Previous Part or Project
3 Model Your Project
4 Demonstration of Your Work