Msburridge (Talk | contribs) |
Msburridge (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
<p> Wells are usually covered to prevent evaporation throughout experimentation. The most common are oils, lids, stickers and seals. The type of cover used can significantly affect the growth rates and overall experimental data (Chavez et al. 2017). Oil has been shown to prevent evaporation entirely, however it significantly lowers the OTR and reduces protein expression, making it sub-optimal for most synthetic biology uses (Chavez et al. 2017). Chavez and colleagues (2017) found that lid and sticker covers allowed for the greatest OTR and protein expression and that lid covering also caused the highest evaporation rate, specifically in the four corner wells. Sealing the plate is another option, however this method has only been to shown to reduce the OTR with minimal evaporation prevention (Zimmermann et al. 2003; Sieben et al. 2016). </p> | <p> Wells are usually covered to prevent evaporation throughout experimentation. The most common are oils, lids, stickers and seals. The type of cover used can significantly affect the growth rates and overall experimental data (Chavez et al. 2017). Oil has been shown to prevent evaporation entirely, however it significantly lowers the OTR and reduces protein expression, making it sub-optimal for most synthetic biology uses (Chavez et al. 2017). Chavez and colleagues (2017) found that lid and sticker covers allowed for the greatest OTR and protein expression and that lid covering also caused the highest evaporation rate, specifically in the four corner wells. Sealing the plate is another option, however this method has only been to shown to reduce the OTR with minimal evaporation prevention (Zimmermann et al. 2003; Sieben et al. 2016). </p> | ||
− | + | </div> | |
− | + | </div> <!-- end services-list --> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
<section id='team' class="s-services"> | <section id='team' class="s-services"> | ||
<div class="row section-header has-bottom-sep" data-aos="fade-up"> | <div class="row section-header has-bottom-sep" data-aos="fade-up"> | ||
− | + | <div class="col-full"> | |
− | + | <h3 class="subhead"></h3> | |
+ | <h1 class="display-2">Aims</h1> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> <!-- end section-header --> | </div> <!-- end section-header --> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
<div class="row services-list block-1-2 block-tab-full"> | <div class="row services-list block-1-2 block-tab-full"> | ||
Line 170: | Line 171: | ||
<div class="row about-desc" data-aos="fade-up"> | <div class="row about-desc" data-aos="fade-up"> | ||
<div class="col-full"> | <div class="col-full"> | ||
+ | <p> The overarching aim for the 2018 Interlab focuses on the weakness in the measurement of fluorescence relative to optical density (OD), as with previous IGEM interlab protocols there is potential discrepancy between optical density and actual cell concentration. This year the iGEM study aims to reduce lab-to-lab variability further by measuring GFP fluorescence relative to absolute cell counts or colony forming units. Normalisation of fluorescence to colony forming units also allows measurement of fluorescence relative only to viable cells, and thus a more accurate measurement of promoter strength, whereas OD600 and absolute cell count measures cannot differentiate between viable and non-viable cells. </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p> However, in this case the GeneMachine team further investigated the core reproducibility and standardisation aspect of the Interlab. What were its flaws and weaknesses? How could variation be minimised? How could it be standardised? Using a statistically driven Design of Experiments (DoE) methodology to aid in optimisation and a BDA workflow for enhanced reproducibility and standardisation, three main aims were investigated: </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <ul style="list-style-type:circle;display:grid;text-align:left;"> | ||
+ | <li> The use of an internal standard to allow comparative results through all test devices indicating sources of variation in protein production and expression. This should highlight the efficacy of promoter strength and resulting protein production. </li> | ||
+ | <li> The development of a E. coli Dh5a growth model to investigate how media effects the expression of the Interlab test devices and to determine the optimal media for reproducible results. </li> | ||
+ | <li> The automation and optimisation of competent cell preparation and transformation workflows. To create an automated and most importantly robust protocol to allow the reproducible generation of competent cells for consistent transformation of E.coli Dh5a. </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | |||
Revision as of 13:03, 10 October 2018