Difference between revisions of "Team:BIT-China/roGFP2-Orp1MichaelisEquationModel"

Line 91: Line 91:
 
         }
 
         }
 
     </style>
 
     </style>
     <script src="js/base-loading.js"></script>
+
     <script src="https://2018.igem.org/Template:BIT-China/js/base-loading?action=raw&ctype=text/javascript"></script>
 
     <script type="text/x-mathjax-config">
 
     <script type="text/x-mathjax-config">
 
         MathJax.Hub.Config({
 
         MathJax.Hub.Config({
Line 201: Line 201:
 
             <div class="MD-content MD-margin-toTitle1">
 
             <div class="MD-content MD-margin-toTitle1">
 
                 <p class="MD-content-p">
 
                 <p class="MD-content-p">
                     In the previous model, we successfully obtained the relationship between intracellular H2O2
+
                     In the previous model, we successfully obtained the relationship between intracellular H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>
                     concentration and extracellular H2O2 concentration. Therefore, we were going to establish the
+
                     concentration and extracellular H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> concentration. Therefore, we were going
                     relationship between intracellular H2O2 concentration and roGFP2-Orp1 in order to evaluate the
+
                    to establish the
 +
                     relationship between intracellular H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> concentration and roGFP2-Orp1 in
 +
                    order to evaluate the
 
                     antioxidant function signal output of our entire system.
 
                     antioxidant function signal output of our entire system.
 
                 </p>
 
                 </p>
Line 217: Line 219:
 
                 <p class="MD-content-p">
 
                 <p class="MD-content-p">
 
                     1. The roGFP2-Orp1 is a fusion protein, and Orp1 is a catalase. Therefore, the reaction process of
 
                     1. The roGFP2-Orp1 is a fusion protein, and Orp1 is a catalase. Therefore, the reaction process of
                     the protein with H2O2 can be considered as a classical enzymatic reaction meaning that this
+
                     the protein with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> can be considered as a classical enzymatic reaction
 +
                    meaning that this
 
                     reaction is a Michael equation, and the oxidation state of roGFP2 is one of the reaction products.
 
                     reaction is a Michael equation, and the oxidation state of roGFP2 is one of the reaction products.
 
                 </p>
 
                 </p>
Line 342: Line 345:
 
                     By substituting the resulting equations (right column of Table 3) into OxD<sub>roGFP2</sub>=N<sub>ox</sub>/N<sub>total</sub>,
 
                     By substituting the resulting equations (right column of Table 3) into OxD<sub>roGFP2</sub>=N<sub>ox</sub>/N<sub>total</sub>,
 
                     the
 
                     the
                     relationship between OxD<sub>roGFP2</sub> and the macroscopic observables can be deduced.(一篇参考文献)
+
                     relationship between OxD<sub>roGFP2</sub> and the macroscopic observables can be deduced.<sup
 +
                        onmouseover="tooltip.pop(this, '#tip-1', {position:1, offsetX:-20, effect:'slide',hideDelay: 10})"
 +
                        style="color:#38679a;">[1]</sup>
 
                 </p>
 
                 </p>
  
Line 372: Line 377:
 
                     the protein concentration was basically the same and according to the data provided in the previous
 
                     the protein concentration was basically the same and according to the data provided in the previous
 
                     literature, it is known that in yeast cells, the Eno2 protein concentration is around 0.5
 
                     literature, it is known that in yeast cells, the Eno2 protein concentration is around 0.5
                     mM.(一篇参考文献)
+
                     mM.<sup onmouseover="tooltip.pop(this, '#tip-2', {position:1, offsetX:-20, effect:'slide',hideDelay: 10})"
 +
                        style="color:#38679a;">[2]</sup>
 
                 </p>
 
                 </p>
  
Line 474: Line 480:
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
 
     <!-- end -->
 
     <!-- end -->
 +
    <div style="display:none;font-family: 'helveticaregular';">
 +
        <div id="tip-1">
 +
            <div class="column" style="width:230px;height: 100px;">
 +
                <a>Morgan B, Sobotta M C, Dick T P. Measuring EGSH and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> with roGFP2-based
 +
                    redox probes[J]. Free Radical Biology & Medicine, 2011, 51(11):1943-1951.
 +
                </a>
 +
            </div>
 +
        </div>
  
 +
        <div id="tip-2">
 +
            <div class="column" style="width:230px;height: 100px;">
 +
                <a>Carroll KM, Simpson DM, Eyers CE, Knight CG, Brownridge P, Dunn WB, Winder CL, Lanthaler K, Pir P,
 +
                    Malys N, Kell DB, Oliver SG, Gaskell SJ, Beynon RJ. Absolute quantification of the glycolytic
 +
                    pathway in yeast: deployment of a complete QconCAT approach. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011 Dec10(12):
 +
                    M111.007633. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M111.007633. Supplementary table V rows "E"-"P"
 +
                </a>
 +
            </div>
 +
        </div>
 +
 +
 +
    </div>
 
     <script src="https://2018.igem.org/Template:BIT-China/js/jquery-min?action=raw&ctype=text/javascript"></script>
 
     <script src="https://2018.igem.org/Template:BIT-China/js/jquery-min?action=raw&ctype=text/javascript"></script>
 
     <script src="https://2018.igem.org/Template:BIT-China/js/copy-tendina?action=raw&ctype=text/javascript"></script>
 
     <script src="https://2018.igem.org/Template:BIT-China/js/copy-tendina?action=raw&ctype=text/javascript"></script>

Revision as of 11:12, 17 October 2018

In the previous model, we successfully obtained the relationship between intracellular H2O2 concentration and extracellular H2O2 concentration. Therefore, we were going to establish the relationship between intracellular H2O2 concentration and roGFP2-Orp1 in order to evaluate the antioxidant function signal output of our entire system.

1. The roGFP2-Orp1 is a fusion protein, and Orp1 is a catalase. Therefore, the reaction process of the protein with H2O2 can be considered as a classical enzymatic reaction meaning that this reaction is a Michael equation, and the oxidation state of roGFP2 is one of the reaction products.

2. The total intracellular concentration of roGFP2 is constant. And roGFP2 has two states, oxidative state and reductive state. And the intercellular protein concentration is depended on the transcription rate of promoter.

3. The two absorption peak values of roGFP2 at 405 nm and 488 nm are linear with the protein concentration in two states.

According to Hypothesis 1, we consider the reaction process of intracellular hydrogen peroxide with roGFP2 as an enzymatic reaction process, which is consistent with the Michael equation.

$$V=\frac{v_{max}[H_{2}O_{2}]}{K_{m}+[H_{2}O_{2}]}$$

Here we define a new parameter OxDroGFP2 to reflect the degree of oxidation of roGFP2. Meanwhile, facilitate subsequent calculations.

$$OxD_{roGFP2}=\frac{[roGFP2_{ox}]}{[roGFP2_{ox}]+[roGFP2_{red}]}$$

According to Hypothesis 3, we can correlate the redox state of roGFP2 with the fluorescence value measured by the macroscopic observables easily. To establish this relationship, several molecular quantities followed need to be defined. i405red, i405ox, i488red, and i488ox are the fluorescence intensities contributed by a single roGFP2 molecule at the indicated wavelength and redox state. Ntotal is the total number of roGFP2 molecules. Nred is the number of reduced roGFP2 molecules. Nox is the number of oxidized roGFP2 molecules. Based on the assumption that the overall fluorescence intensity is equal to the sum of the fluorescence intensities from the individual roGFP2 molecules, the relationships were given in Table 3.

Table 3. Relationships Between Fluorescence Intensities and Probe Molecules

Condition Formula
Limiting condition 1: Ntotal = Nred I405red = Ntotal · i405red
Complete reduction Nox = 0 I488red = Ntotal · i488red
Limiting condition 2: Ntotal = Nox I405ox = Ntotal · i405ox
Complete oxidation Nred = 0 I488ox = Ntotal · i488ox
Actual measurement Ntotal = Nred + Nox I405 = Nox · i405ox + Nred · i405red
I488 = Nox · i488ox + Nred · i488red

By substituting the resulting equations (right column of Table 3) into OxDroGFP2=Nox/Ntotal, the relationship between OxDroGFP2 and the macroscopic observables can be deduced.[1]

$$oxD_{roGFP2}=\frac{I405\cdot I488_{red}-I405_{red}\cdot I488}{I405\cdot I488_{red}-I405\cdot I488_{ox}+I405_{ox}\cdot I488-I405_{red}\cdot I488}$$

After the above relationship is completed, since the absolute protein concentration determination is difficult, we define the relative reaction rate as

$$V^{'}=\frac{V}{[roGFP2_{ox}]+[roGFP2_{red}]}$$

$$OxD_{roGFP2}=\frac{[roGFP2_{ox}]}{[roGFP2_{ox}]+[roGFP2_{red}]}$$

$$V^{'}=\frac{OxD^{'}-OxD}{t^{'}-t}$$

At the same time, according to Hypothesis 2, roGFP2total is constant, but the protein concentration could not be measured by us. So we thought that under the same promoter conditions, the protein concentration was basically the same and according to the data provided in the previous literature, it is known that in yeast cells, the Eno2 protein concentration is around 0.5 mM.[2]

So we could get:

$$[roGFP2_{total}]=0.5\ mM$$

In order to obtain the two constants in the Micheal equation, we measured the reaction rate of the reaction in yeast cells by applying different concentrations of H2O2 and using the simulation results of the H2O2 Decomposition Model in combination with the function of roGFP2. The results were as follows:

Fig.4 Fluorescence ratio measurement data from wet experiment
Fig.5 Reaction rate measurement data from wet experiment

Calculate two constants by double reciprocal mapping.

Fig.6 vmax⁡ and Km⁡ calculation using double reciprocal mapping

$$v_{max}=0.015207$$

$$K_{m}=0.451642$$

The relationship between the change in fluorescence intensity of roGFP2 and the concentration of intracellular H2O2 is set up successfully.

Our model has been successfully implemented. Different concentrations of intracellular H2O2 can change the spectral properties of our system's roGFP2, and successfully convert our selected ROS signal (Intercellular H2O2 concentration) into a visualized fluorescent signal that means we can evaluate the intercellular H2O2 concentration easily through calculate the OxD value. However, due to time and experimental limitation, our model is only a preliminary establishment, and its subsequent calibration work is limited by experiment and time, there is no enough time to continue optimization .We also hoped that there will be follow-up teams to continue to finish our models.