Team:Tongji China/Public Engagement
Human Practice
Engagement & Education
We propose to write popular science readings and spread our project idea in WeChat, which to be specific, is spreading in form of “WeChat Push” —a prevalent way of scientific knowledge propagation in China – as well as accept the timely response from our readers’ comments and surveys results. All the pushes are sent under the official account of Tongji Life Science and Technology Department, but are featured in series called “i积木”, which is homophonic for IGEM in Chinese and means “my blocks”.
For better understanding to the readers, whose ages might vary from 8 to 80, we process the contents of WeChat push series in a mild way. That is, to start with comprehensive description of synthetic biology, followed by popular science readings in several aspects of our project, such as the intestinal flora, tumor, immunotherapy and gene therapy, and finally came the basic conception of our project, how we induce immunoreaction by oral administration of processed attenuated engineered P. aeruginosa. The pushes came out once a week, several of which were followed by the relative surveys we designed for collecting social response to the certain topic and more significantly, the points of view on our project.
When it comes to spreading new concepts, students are always the best group to be advocated, for efforts may get paid off if you could inspire them and lead them into further research.
To reach this goal, we held a lecture in the first middle school attached to Tongji University. There we talked about basics of synthetic biology, cancer etc. By this way, we generated a lot of students who were interested in biology and made them think about both the length and the quality of life.
To start with synthetic biology, we first threw out this concept which was not quite familiar to most of students. The topic then went into the understanding of “standard parts” with practical usages, some of which were projects of IGEM in the past five years. It was easy to tell that due to great possibilities in this field, the topic had fully aroused students' interest.
Then we led the topic to the key of our project – cancer therapy, which ended with a debate held among students, arguing whether it was proper for the patients to choose euthanasia when little chance was left for them to be cured. Discussion went to the extent of ethic and legality, reason and emotion, ideas got exchanged and the understanding to cancer went deeper.
"I support euthanasia, because I believe it is valuable for the patient and the society. As far as I knew, terminal disease sufferers such as patients with advanced cancer always endure enormous pain, some of them even take in Morphine or other drugs to reduce it. At that stage, even the relatives of the patient want to end his life for his sake while they were blocked by the law.
I think life is our own thing, and our relatives and we have the right to choose what to do with it. "
"I don’t agree with the former one.
I think the introducing of the new law which is allowing the euthanasia will come with chaos. Believe it or not, some bad people will manipulate it for their own interest, cause it’s hard to define which situations are allowed to execute euthanasia. Even if we finally define it properly, what if the patient is just a bit depression at that time? There are a lot of things left to be resolved.
I just don’t approve it is admitted now or a bit further. It doesn’t mean I can stand it. "
"I also bring some important things of euthanasia.
First, the choosing of executor is very difficult. Unlike executors who are treating prisoners, euthanasia executor will suffer a great mental burden for they kill someone who is purity and weak. They will also be accused because of the loophole in law.
Then, there are conflicts with constitution or other laws, for the existence of this executor is disobeyed our conventional sense. It is hard to convert it from now to around time.
I think time will finally give us the only answer. "
"I think it’s better to introduce law of euthanasia as soon as possible.
The previous students are really reasonable. But they don’t understand laws. Laws are growing. If we don’t try it at first, we will never its outcome and we won’t have an advanced law anymore. Just waiting won’t change anything. "
To make closer communication with fellow teams, we participated in the 5th CCiC in Shanghai Tech University in China. During the attendance, we benefited from the discussion in several aspects: take the useful advice to optimize our design, troubleshooting, experience from other teams, and so on. Friendship with several schools was built up, with some of which we still kept contact for collaboration.
