Keithaiken (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
<body> | <body> | ||
− | <div class="content"> | + | <div class="content"> |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
<p class="f14">Based on HIV-1 homology to Arc, Zhang <i>et al.</i> (2015) similarly predicted a conserved Gag domain to span <i>R. norvegicus</i> Arc amino acids 207-278 (Gag N-lobe) and 278-370 (Gag C-lobe). | <p class="f14">Based on HIV-1 homology to Arc, Zhang <i>et al.</i> (2015) similarly predicted a conserved Gag domain to span <i>R. norvegicus</i> Arc amino acids 207-278 (Gag N-lobe) and 278-370 (Gag C-lobe). | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
+ | We then compared this conserved bi-lobar Gag region with the predicted RNA binding region for Gag gene products to ensure RNA packaging functionality would be maintained (Clever, Sassetti, & Parslow, 1995). A portion of the 4 stem loop RNA secondary structure in HIV-1 strongly aligns with a sequence located within the Arc Gag N-lobe: | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/e/e9/T--Lethbridge--vincentFace.png" alt="" style=""> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
− | </div> / | + | |
+ | <h1>Structural Model of Minimal Arc</h1> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="oneText-Wrapper"> | ||
+ | <div class="oneText-Text"> | ||
+ | <p class="f14">Using <u><a href="https://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/">I-TASSER</a></u>(Roy, Kucukural, & Zhang, 2010; Yang <i>et al.,</i> 2015; Zhang, 2008), we then predicted and modeled the secondary and tertiary structure of this minimal Arc Gag protein (where a higher score indicates a more confident prediction of secondary structure): | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/e/e9/T--Lethbridge--vincentFace.png" alt="" style=""> | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </div> | ||
</html> | </html> |
Revision as of 19:15, 13 October 2018
MODEL
While VLPs will be useful components of VINCEnT, we wanted to focus on development of a novel non-immunogenic PNC with RNA packaging capabilities. Such a tool could enable simpler transfection of mammalian cell lines for fellow iGEMers and other researchers.
To do this, we identified the Rattus norvegicus Arc protein as a candidate for modelling a minimal packaging protein. Arc is an activity-regulated cytoskeletal-associated protein that has recently been recognized as a repurposed Ty3/Gypsy retrotransposon. A bi-lobar domain within Arc has significant homology to Gag proteins, which are the major capsid proteins of many viruses including Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1 (HIV-1), Rous-Sarcoma Virus (RSV), and Bovine Leukemia Virus (BLV). In response to synaptic activity in neurons, Arc proteins self-assemble via this Gag domain (similar to the related viral particles) to encapsulate Arc mRNA and shuttle it to neighbouring cells (Pastuzyn et al., 2018; Ashley et al., 2018).
To ensure we would not retain any native Arc functionality that might impact cellular activity, we designed a “minimal” Arc Gag protein based on homology with other known Gag domains. We used template-based structural predictions to model this minimal Arc Gag and its predicted assembly into higher-order structures.
SEQUENCE DESIGN
Using the EMBL-EBI Clustal Omega tool,we aligned the protein sequences of HIV-1 (GenBank BAF32552.1), BLV (GenBank BAA00543.1), and RSV (PDB 5A9E) Gag proteins to R. norvegicus Arc (NCBI Ref NP_062234.1). The most closely conserved sequences are shown below:
Based on HIV-1 homology to Arc, Zhang et al. (2015) similarly predicted a conserved Gag domain to span R. norvegicus Arc amino acids 207-278 (Gag N-lobe) and 278-370 (Gag C-lobe).
We then compared this conserved bi-lobar Gag region with the predicted RNA binding region for Gag gene products to ensure RNA packaging functionality would be maintained (Clever, Sassetti, & Parslow, 1995). A portion of the 4 stem loop RNA secondary structure in HIV-1 strongly aligns with a sequence located within the Arc Gag N-lobe:
Structural Model of Minimal Arc
Using I-TASSER(Roy, Kucukural, & Zhang, 2010; Yang et al., 2015; Zhang, 2008), we then predicted and modeled the secondary and tertiary structure of this minimal Arc Gag protein (where a higher score indicates a more confident prediction of secondary structure):