Jenny860831 (Talk | contribs) |
Jenny860831 (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 271: | Line 271: | ||
<p class="pcontent">Location:Biotechnology Green Energy Expo conference hall</p> | <p class="pcontent">Location:Biotechnology Green Energy Expo conference hall</p> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | + | <ol> | |
+ | <li class="licontent">Is the bioreactor technology being involved in ITRI? | ||
</li> | </li> | ||
<p class="pcontent">There is a biotechnology laboratory in ITRI. They work for convert microalgae into bio-fuel and dry anaerobic fermentation. Therefore, bioreactor technology was involved in ITRI. | <p class="pcontent">There is a biotechnology laboratory in ITRI. They work for convert microalgae into bio-fuel and dry anaerobic fermentation. Therefore, bioreactor technology was involved in ITRI. | ||
− | + | <li class="licontent">After the carbon capture process, how to transfer those captured carbon dioxide while being condensed? | |
</li> | </li> | ||
− | + | <p class="pcontent">Once CO<sub>2</sub> was captured, we will liquefy it to decrease volume and then the vehicles will carry those high density liquefaction CO<sub>2</sub> to storage. Or through piping, we can transfer captured CO<sub>2</sub. to north of the sea for sequestration. | |
</p> | </p> | ||
− | + | <p class="pcontent">However, technology of carbon capture and storage (CCS) didn't implement in Taiwan, since that the inhabitant in Taiwan regarded CCS as environmentally hazardous technology. More and more national disaster due to climate led to local doubts about the safety of CCS. The currently policy of reduce carbon emission is to reach 2% decreasing CO<sub>2</sub> emission on 2020 compared with the standard year. The long-term emission reduction goal is to cut emission in 2050 by 50% compared to 2005 levels totally we hope to clean 1 hundred million tons of CO<sub>2</sub>. The main challenge was the downstream process of CCS, utilizing technology. | |
</p> | </p> | ||
− | + | <p class="pcontent">According to the Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act which was passed by Taiwan’s parliament (the Legislative Yuan), 1 tons of carbon tax is 100NT dollar, which is that industrial working hard to avoid high tax. However, what is the next step? | |
</p> | </p> | ||
− | + | <li class="licontent">In the downstream process, can we reuse the waste heat produced from the factory for sterilization? | |
</li> | </li> | ||
− | + | <p class="pcontent">That is not a big problem. The temperature of waste heat produces from factory is around 100 to 1500 and 150 degree Celsius is suitable for our sterilization. So it is kind of a win-win situation because it do not cost extra energy or money for factory. | |
</p> | </p> | ||
− | + | <li class="pcontent">Taiwan does not focus on carbon sequestration, so will Taiwan use our technique? How to reduce the cost? | |
</li> | </li> | ||
− | + | <p class="pcontent">From the cost side, it is one thousand per gram because is not large scale but only laboratory level. How much cost can be reduced for one ton? How much cost can be reduced if we enlarge the scale? It does not cost too much reusing the industrial waste. | |
</p> | </p> | ||
− | + | <li class="pcontent">Now the technology renewable energy is mature, why not convert carbon dioxide into energy? | |
</li> | </li> | ||
− | + | <p class="pcontent">If we convert it to bio-fuel, the cost is NTD 50 (2 dollars) per litter. And the price that China Petroleum Corporation (CPC) sells is NTD 30 (1 dollar) per litter. Although the government will subsidize NTD 20 (1 dollar), it might not be a long term strategy. The industrial must find a way to reduce the cost itself. Besides, the edible product is more valuable than energy, but it also has higher limitation about listing. | |
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | </ol> | ||
<div> | <div> | ||
<img class="bigimg" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/85/T--NCKU_Tainan--ITRI2.png"> | <img class="bigimg" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/8/85/T--NCKU_Tainan--ITRI2.png"> |
Revision as of 11:18, 14 October 2018