Difference between revisions of "Team:NCKU Tainan/Applied Design"
Huiyee11186 (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
We use CSC represent China Steel. | We use CSC represent China Steel. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
| − | < | + | <p><a class="link" href="https://2018.igem.org/Team:NCKU_Tainan/Entrepreneurship#CSC">Click to see complete interview</a></p> |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 12:28, 14 October 2018
Product Design
Product Design
Fig.1 Flow chart of E. coli carbon utilization system
- Overview
- Control System
In this project, we, the NCKU Tainan Team, have proposed an alternative way to reduce the emission of Carbon dioxide (CO2). Referring to the opinions and feedbacks from many industry experts and professors, we design a new factory flow to capture CO2 by E. coli Not only our device meets the specs to commercialize, but it also demonstrates high cost performance.
The emission of CO2 has been a serious problem for a century that causes global warming and severe climate change. Even though many ways have been tried to reduce it, the generation of CO2 primarily from industry is still overwhelming. Therefore, scientists and governments have been working hard to find solutions to tackle the problem.
Fig. 2 Overview of the control system
There are many aspects we need to consider. First, we calculate the emission velocity of CO2 from the factory, as well as the medium exchange rate and the growth rate of our E. coli.
Fig. 1 is a process of whole E. coli carbon utilization that we design for industrial application. We simplify it into three parts which shows in Fig. 2 to explain more clearly. Three switches control three parts, named A, B and C. Basically, the factory replaces the medium twice a day. At one hour before replacing the medium, the user needs to turn on switch C to discharge ninety percent of the medium. When it is time to replace the medium, switch C will be turned off and switch B will be turned on to refill medium. When sufficient medium is added, switch B will be turned off and switch A will be turned on to let CO2 in. Just like the animation showed on Fig. 1.
Considering the cost, the growth time of our E. coli and the floor area, we optimized replace time of the medium, replace it every twelve hours and with 72 parallel bioreactors. Next, we are going to have more detail description on three parts, which are Gas preparation system and flow system, Medium preparation, and Downstream products purification and biosafety.
A. Gas preparation system and flow system
Fig. 3 Diagram of gas preparation system and flow system
According to IGCC (Integrate Gasification Combined Cycle) flow diagram, the fuel is first converted to syngas which is a mixture of H2 and CO. The syngas is then burned in a combined cycle consisting of a gas turbine and a steam turbine with a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG). After CO2 / H2 separation, IGCC can reach the demand of CO2 purity including low SOx and NOx emission fraction of allowable limits of bacteria. Finally, the produced flue gas could enter the pipeline leading to the bioreactor.
In E. coli utilization system, the air is pumped in to neutralize the concentration of CO2. A controlled valve is used to control flow rate and split distribution. When the switch a is turned on, the switch b will be turned off, and vice versa. As for the CO2 inlet and outlet, it will maintain an open system of bioreactor. In other words, CO2 will enter continuously and cause some non-reacted CO2 emitted.
Fig. 4 IGCC process flow diagram. Source: Vattenfall. (2010) Syngas has been treated by sulfur and nitrogen removal, as well as heavy metal removal and cooling tank. Through IGCC process, purified CO2 in flue gas is allowable for E. coli CO2 utilizing.
B. Medium preparation
Fig. 5 Diagram of medium preparation
At this stage, we have two sections to consider, medium storage and medium preparation before replacing time.
The medium is composed of M9 salt and xylose. For storage, we will convert it into powder with the required proportion. At one hour before replacing time, pour the powder into the medium tank and turn on the water injection switch. Turn on the stirrer of medium tank to have medium powder and water perfect mixing. The outlet of bioreactor (switch c) will be turned on at the same time, letting ninety percent of the medium in the bioreactor flow out . When the medium have prepared well, turn on the switch a and switch b for replacing medium in bioreactor, while the switch c will be turned off.
We also consider the process of raw materials, especially xylose, which is the key source of our pathway. Since xylose is one of the products of agricultural waste degradation, we visited the 2018 Tainan Biotechnology and Green Energy Expo to consulted with researchers from National Energy Program-Phase II, whose projects was biofuel and biodegradable plastic production via agricultural waste. They had developed technique that degrade cellulose and semi-cellulose by ion solution.
Besides, we have opportunity to collaborate with UESTC-Chian team . They work for degrading straw with synthetic biology and convert the product into bio-fuel. One of the product from straw degradation is xylose. These techniques are eco-friendly and low-energy-require. Therefore, the process development of xylose production will be a low-carbon-emission process.
C. Downstream products purification and biosafety
Fig. 6 Diagram of downstream process
We will discharge 90% of the used medium in the bioreactor one hour before new medium flows in. Which means that we let 10% of the reacted bacteria remain in the bioreactor to maintain a steady cell density condition of in the bioreactor. The effluent medium will be sterilized and filtered in the downstream clean-up tank. At this step, we harvest the bacteria by centrifuging and extracting the by-product such as amino acids, proteins, medicine or bio-fuel. Different extracting process designed depends on different by-product.
Besides, we try to reuse the waste heat of factories for sterilizing. The waste water can be recycled as well. Through Removing toxins and adjusting pH value the effluent could return to the medium tank. As for energy require for this system, renewable energy helps us to reach near -zero carbon emission process.
Entrepreneurship : China Steel
Fig.7 Picture of CSC interview
Meeting with experts and stakeholders is important in shaping our project to fulfill the needs of our target user. China Steel Corporation is the largest integrated steel Manufacturer in Taiwan. Also, they had been adopting the algal bio-sequestration by cooperating with the research group at our university. Click here to know more in Entrepreneurship：Process, Suggestion and question and Interview record.
Process
We were given the opportunity to meet with the senior executive of China Steel Corporation to gain invaluable insight for our research. The meeting commenced with our presentation. During the presentation, we introduced our project, including the bioreactor design and the industrial model. By listing out all the aspects we had considered, we would like to obtain advice on the practical and social considerations involved in the application of our project in industry.
Suggestion and Question
Will the high concentration of CO2 retard growth of engineered bacteria?
Microalgae is reported resistant to SOx and NOx. Does E. coli survive under such conditions?
The best condition for engineered E. coli to capture CO2 is a lower CO2 concentration without too much SOx and NOx particles. However, we won’t be able to provide an ideal culture condition in Industrial application. After testing the tolerance of E. coli, we conclude that E. coli is possible to survive under that kind of condition in factory and the only effects its expression. It may not capture as much CO2 as culture in the lab.
It is important to define a specific commercial product that can be truly produced since your user may consider its economic viability. They stated that a product that can be widely used is better. At the same time, we should consider current GMO legislation if we want to commercialize those products. The actual condition is not as ideal as in the laboratory, we should optimize the condition to maximize the carbon fixation ability of the microbes.
Interview record
The record can be separated into two parts. One is about their feedback after interview, another one is our customer investigate questions. We use CSC represent China Steel.
Business Model
Cost Evaluation
The cost evaluation is always crucial for product being on the market. To compare our engineered E. coli to microalgae, we calculate how much the cost it would be when capturing 1000 grams CO2.
Volume
Table 1 Volume require in capturing 1000 g CO2
| Organisms | CO2-fixation rate (mg/L*hr) | Biomass concentration (gDCW/L) | Specific CO2-fixation rate | Volume needed (L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineered E. coli | 19.6 | 0.87 | 22.5 | 51000 |
| Chlorella vulgaris | 53 | 5.7 | 9.3 | 19000 |
Cost
The most expensive source in the medium of our engineered E. coli is xylose. 1 mole xylose will capture 0.17 mole CO2, so it would need 20.0535 kilograms xylose and 1 kilogram xylose is cost 2 USD. The total cost for our engineered E. coli is require 40.107 USD for capture 1 kilogram CO2. In contrast, microalgae need 1000 liter to capture 250 gram CO2, so it need 4000 liter (about 4 Tons) water and 1 tons is cost 9.78 USD (300NT). The total cost for microalgae is require 39.13 USD.
Table 2 Cost require in capturing 1000 g CO2
| Item | Microalgae | Engineered E. coli |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 utilizing rate | 250g/m3/day | 19.6 mg/g (DRY cell weight) |
| source required for 1kg CO2 utilization | 4 tons of water | 20.0535kg xylose |
| Cost | 39.13USD | 40.107USD |
| Source | NCKU Annan campus | Adjust reference[1] and experiment |
According to our research of mircoalgae culture in AN-nan campus, we list the data of its cost and CO2 utilization rate to help us optimize our project. As a result, we conclude that Engineered E. coli has a strong competitive advantage with proper cost to apply it.
Future Work
For industrial application design, we focus on manufacturing valuable products using pyruvate and the linkage between our engineered E. coli between factory. We have designed a device containing our recombinant E. coli, constructed a system which links with factory. However, we still look forward to more modifications of our biological pathway and system.
The most important intermediate product, pyruvate, is also possible to be converted to other compounds by E. coli native enzymes or constructed enzymes which is clone into E. coli from other organism. For future work of pyruvate, we expect that it is predicable to produce amino acid, fatty acid, biofuel and even biodegradable plastic. Pyruvate is crucial for central metabolism pathway, the TCA cycle, of most organism and has the potential to become vary biochemistry compounds.
We set our first future goal at producing glutamine, an essential amino acid for human and some animals. We can simply purify it as a nutrient supply. Not only for medical and daily usage for people, but also for animal husbandry. Furthermore, glutamine can easily convert to other amino acid, and potentially produce other proteins.
Fig. 8 Diagram of pyruvate in central carbon metabolism
Furthermore, researchers have successfully constructed pathways produced cellulose and Poly 3-Hydroxybutyrate-co-3-Hydroxyvalerate through the TCA cycle. We are confident of manufacturing more valuable and diverse products from pyruvate.
WAs for the device we designed, we expect that it is possible to modify our device for power generator and other industry. Our device can utilize CO2 and convert it into various valuable products. With our system, companies can not only reduce CO2 emission but also make profits.
References
- Fuyu G, Guoxia L, Xiaoyun Z, Jie Z, Zhen C and Yin L. Quantitative analysis of an engineered CO2-fixing Escherichia coli reveals great potential of heterotrophic CO2 fixation. Gong et al. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2015, 8:86.
- 張嘉修、陳俊延、林志生、楊勝仲、周德珍、郭子禎、顏宏偉、李澤民 (2015), 二氧化碳再利用─微藻養殖, 科學發展 2015 年 6 月│ 510 期
- Lawrence Irlam (2017), GLOBAL COSTS OF CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE, Global CCS Institute, Senior Adviser Policy & Economics, Asia-Pacific Region
- Jin Hwan Park, Jae Eun Oh, Kwang Ho Lee, Ji Young Kim, and Sang Yup Lee. Rational Design of Escherichia coli for L‑Isoleucine Production. [ACS Synth Biol.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23656230#) 2012
- M. KUNDAK, L. LAZI], J. RNKO. CO2 EMISSIONS IN THE STEEL INDUSTRY. METALURGIJA 48, 2009
- V. N. Kalpana, D. Sathya Prabhu, S. Vinodhini and Devirajeswari V. Biomedical waste and its management. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2016
- Qian Ma, Quanwei Zhang, Qingyang Xu, Chenglin Zhang, Yanjun Li, Xiaoguang Fan, Xixian Xie, Ning Chen. Systems metabolic engineering strategies for the production of amino acids. Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology 2 (2017)
- Jørgen Barsett Magnus, Daniel Hollwedel, Marco Oldiges, and Ralf Takors. Monitoring and Modeling of the Reaction Dynamics in the Valine/Leucine Synthesis Pathway in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biotechnol. Prog. 2006
- Isao Kusumoto. Industrial Production of L-Glutamine. American Society for Nutritional Sciences, 2001
- Quan Chen, Qian Wang, Guoqing Wei, Quanfeng Liang, and Qingsheng Qi. Production inEscherichia coli of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-co-3-Hydroxyvalerate) with Differing Monomer Compositions from Unrelated Carbon Sources. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011