Difference between revisions of "Team:Newcastle/Results/Endophyte1"
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
<!-- home | <!-- home | ||
================================================== --> | ================================================== --> | ||
| − | <section id="home" class="s-home target-section" data-parallax="scroll" data-image-src=" | + | <section id="home" class="s-home target-section" data-parallax="scroll" data-image-src="" data-natural-width=3000 data-natural-height=2200 data-position-y=center> |
<div class="overlay"></div> | <div class="overlay"></div> | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
<h1> | <h1> | ||
| − | + | Root Colonisation | |
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
</h1> | </h1> | ||
Revision as of 14:08, 15 October 2018
Alternative Roots
Root Colonisation
RESULTS
Developing Pseudomonas as a new endophytic chassis
Using seedlings inoculated with wild type Pseudomonas sp., DAPI staining and bright field microscopy were used to visualise the relationship between plant and bacteria. This revealed a biofilm was present on the surface of the root however it was unclear if the bacteria was inside the root, so seedlings were washed in distilled water. Examination of the cleaned seedlings revealed clear signs of colonisation and Pseudomonas sp. was present in intercellular spaces along both the root and hypocotyl. The bacteria were still motile and we could see them moving in real time.
Figure 14. Bright field microscopy of a DAPI stained Arabidopsis thaliana root at 40x magnification. Wild type Pseudomonas sp. is visible in the intercellular spaces.
A selection of Pseudomonas sp. transformant-inoculated seedlings were taken for microscopy, again seedlings were washed and DAPI stained.Endophytic bacteria were visible inside the root and hypocotyl of both Arabidopsis thaliana and Eruca sativa seedlings showing that transformation had not altered the bacteria’s ability to colonise.
Figure 21. Bright field microscopy of an Arabidopsis thaliana seedling root at x100 magnification,showing transformed Pseudomonas sp. living as an endophyte in the intercellular spaces.
A selection of seedlings were again selected for microscopy, this time negative control E. coli DH5α inoculated seedlings were examined. Microscopy revealed that though E. coli was present on the root surface, there was no sign of endophytic relationship like that of Pseudomonas sp.. Further images were taken of transformant Pseudomonas sp. inoculated seedlings to aid visual demonstration of our transformed endophyte working.
Figure 23.Bright field microscopy showing the root of our negative control Arabidopsis thaliana at100x magnification, where E. coli DH5α was visible on the surface of the root in small numbers but not inside the root as an endophyte.
REFERENCES & Attributions
Attributions: Frank Eardley and Lewis Tomlinson